Some thoughts on financing the BBC

How to assess the options—Licence fee? From tax? Subscription? Advertising?)

• business model only (“if it’s such value for money it can easily sell subscriptions”)
• public service (society as a whole benefiting)

Finance➡️Economics…

1/15
A couple of key concepts

• ECONOMIES OF SCALE. Eg news—from Radio Stoke to Westminster to BBC Washington Bureau to Pashtu Service (Afghanistan), reporters feed a central newsroom supplying multiple BBC outlets. Similar sharing in arts, music, documentaries, sport, more …

2/15
• EXTERNALITIES (positive), the public service dimension—when something (broadcasting) has a broader benefit than simply between the producer and consumer (more than just the viewer enjoying Newsnight or East Enders)

3/15 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externali…
A SMALL public service: one road, Livingston to Falkirk

The internal benefits go to those using the road. Positive external benefits include eg residents’ health from delivered food and medicines, but they will only be locally sourced.

(Ignore negative externalities)

4/15
BIG PUBLIC SERVICE: stick the road into a nationwide network. The benefits multiply.

Tesco sets up a distribution centre in Livingston. Goods supplied from everywhere. Residents along the Falkirk road have more healthy choices. Relatives from Edinburgh can visit too

5/15
That’s economies of scale and positive externalities working together.

It’s why having a large National Health Service is better than small independent hospitals and clinics.

And it’s why a big BBC can provide a better public service at lower cost.

6/15
How to pay for it?

This⬇️ ignores both economies of scale and broader benefit. It’s the USER-PAY PRINCIPLE. You pay for what you use.

But would @JuliaHB1 apply that to using the road network? You only pay for the roads you use ➡️ every road has a toll.

Or to healthcare?

7/15
The alternative is the PUBLIC SERVICE PRINCIPLE

We pay for the lot—more economical + public benefits

How expensive is it? This⬇️ is only possible because of economies of scale. Basic Netflix is half the price but with much less than half the output

8/15
There is no way that a user-pay approach can preserve the BBC as a public service. If it’s subscription only, the number of subscribers will fall, and income too. The economies of scale will be lost.

But “public service” and “positive externalities” are difficult to assess

9/15
The public benefits—information, “culture”

I’m sure there are studies showing how CBeebies and cbbc are better for kids than the commercial cartoon channels, but few see it.

How to measure the benefit of this⬇️?

EVERY DAY FOR 6 WEEKS, EVERY YEAR

10/15
Don’t get me wrong. It’s not just classical music.

Compare the BBC’s contribution to live music (TV and radio) with, say Classic FM or commercial pop/rock radio or any other TV channel. Forget streaming services like Spotify or Tidal.

11/15
The BBC has set quality standards that other broadcasters have then matched (or tried to) or occasionally have done better

One measure of the value of the public service is the high level of trust BBC news enjoys in comparison with other media.

12/15 reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/bbc-under…
But there will still be those who say that none of that is important. Who’s to say they are wrong? That’s what the political process and public opinion will decide.

Implicitly or explicitly—by deciding on the financing method.

13/15 theguardian.com/media/2021/mar…
These are likely to cut economies of scale and the public benefits:

• subscription—numbers will fall
• advertising—the market is weak, look at ITV 1–4
• a reduced or voluntary licence fee

That matters if the BBC is valued as a public service

14/15 committees.parliament.uk/publications/5…
Other options are available such as tax revenue (if protected for the BBC) or keeping the licence fee (affordable for most, tough for some, and regressive)

I think we should stand by the BBC, or even walk with it …

15/15/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

Jan 12,
It’s not easy to separate issues, but I think the reaction to Monday’s @wto meeting has been overblown.

The main question: will an online meeting of ministers right now help break the deadlock over the intellectual property waiver?

Even some waiver-supporters said “no”.

1/4
Those who want an online meeting of ministers at this stage have to explain how they think it would help break the deadlock.

This ⬇️ is what happens in a virtual meeting of ministers from the whole WTO.

#TRIPSwaiver @DimitriEynikel

2/4 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2022/01/10/no-…
So, a stream of prepared speeches, sequenced by time zone, no interaction.

No surprise that some pro-waiver countries are sceptical too.

ACP coordinator is Vanuatu. What time will it be in Vanuatu when EU and US speak?

#TRIPSwaiver @DimitriEynikel

3/4 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2022/01/10/no-…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 5,
This is an interesting development. Some observations:

1. EUA = emergency use authorisation

2. As a least-developed country, Bangladesh is not *required* to protect patents (or any intellectual property) under the WTO agreement.

3. But ...
3. But Bangladesh does have a patent law, 110 years old, from 1911. It has been drafting a new law since 2012, apparently not yet completed.

wto.org/english/tratop… (page 83)

4. It's unclear from the news story ...
5. It's unclear from the news story if Bangladesh's approval of Bexovid (the generic version of Paxlovid) is under procedures for patented products within the law, or because the drug's patent is not registered in Bangladesh.

6. The news story says ...

economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healt…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 3,
A New Year gift for Trade Twitter

Work in the @wto is increasingly “plurilateral” = among part of the membership (“multilateral” = the whole membership)

Is it the way to go when WTO-wide consensus is elusive?

It’s controversial. There are pitfalls

1/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/17-…
This is an attempt to explain plurilaterals. It’s in 2 parts:

• General explanation, including political and legal pitfalls
• The plurilaterals, each in a nutshell. There are 17, so I’m afraid it’s long, from e-commerce to environment and trade

2/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/17-…
Plurilaterals are not new. They date back at least to the 1960s and 1970s under the pre-WTO GATT.

5 are now fully multilateral WTO agreements
2 are still plurilateral
2 have been scrapped

3/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/17-…
Read 7 tweets
Dec 12, 2021
COVID-19 situation in Switzerland 🇨🇭 this weekend

1. Case numbers at record high but testing is also high
2. Hospitalisations and deaths rising

1/6 covid19.admin.ch/en/overview?ti… Image
Bear in mind testing in 🇨🇭 is now much higher than it used to be. Not surprising that detected cases are also high.

But that doesn't explain hospitalisations and deaths

2/6 covid19.admin.ch/en/overview?ti… Image
Vaccination rates in 🇨🇭 are not brilliant, particularly (but not only) in the German-speaking east

3/6 covid19.admin.ch/en/overview?ti… Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 7, 2021
The 12th WTO Ministerial Conference #MC12 is postponed. What now?

Can ambassadors get close to agreement on their own? They couldn’t in November.

And can ministers find the necessary compromises on Zoom?

Fingers crossed. With @BobWolfeSPS

1/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/12/06/goo…
GOOD NEWS:

• ministers avoided embarrassment of a failed #MC12 meeting (although spin would have made it look like it achieved a lot, not just kicked cans)

• the approaching meeting focused minds, produced lots of work, before it was abandoned

2/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/12/06/goo… Image
THE BAD

There was so much members disagreed about, most of it with little sign of compromise. They couldn’t even agree on what to call the statement to be issued at the end of the Ministerial Conference #MC12

For now it’s a draft “outcome document”.

3/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/12/06/goo… Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 1, 2021
NEW—document in the talks among 67 WTO members (EU=28) on streamlining domestic regulation of services.

This lists the countries that have submitted their “schedules” (lists) of commitments. Includes all the major traders = a “critical mass”

1/5 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S… ImageImageImage
In principle, those commitments would comply with WTO non-discrimination rules (“most-favoured nation”), meaning they would apply to service suppliers from all WTO members, including free-riding non-participants.

We have to see the details to confirm

2/5 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S… ImageImageImage
Members’ individual commitments are drafted according to a “reference paper” released yesterday.

That reference paper will probably not be legally binding (wait for tomorrow’s announcement), but the “schedules” of commitments will be, when certified

3/5
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(