Is it “not clear that 'coloniality' is the cause” of COVID19 vaccine inequality? Maybe not for many (helpful article in that sense), let's discuss.
THREAD🧵#decolonizing starting w political economy: $trillions for North's corporate, R&D, university "capacity" has an origin.../1
First: colonialism was a system of resource extraction, slave trade, and global commerce that enriched the global North and has had long-running harm for Southern economies… inequality in resources is not naturally occurring/2
Empiricaly clear e.g. Nunn "the world’s current income differences could be explained by the divergent effects of European contact globallty, which resulted in a massive transfer of disease, food, ideas, and people.../3 science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
Don't love economics literature that mirrors neocolonial tropes, but long-running effects of colonialism and slave trade are really clear: impact on today's domestic & global economies
e.g. Oasis Kodila-Tedika, Albert Tcheta-Bampa, Patrick Lusenge-Ndungo/4 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
...and this extraction continues. Every year trillions in wealth moves from the global South to the global North through a wide variety of mechanisms and a value chain that continues the global economic inequalities born from colonial period... tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
But isn't this thread about COVID-19 vaccines? Yes: When #COVID19 hit, why did high-income countries have the world's best funded universities, billions on hand to dump into creating vaccines, and unlimited coffers to buy them up? Why didn't the South? Colonialism./6
Of course things are of course more complicated than that, but this is twitter and you get my point (that's why I sent links). So, moving on... /7
What about global plans to distribute vaccines? Did we just have no good ideas? Nope: Southern leaders including Sall/Senegal, Khan/Pakistan, Akufo-Addo/Ghana, Ramaphosa/SAfrica put out a vision of sharing technology, leveraging expertise in 2020.../8
Yet in the centers of global health, as has been widely reported, African, Asian, and Latin American leaders played little role in creating the institutional response.../9 nytimes.com/2021/08/02/wor…
Why? Might this have something to do with it? /10
👇
...and if so, might 👆reality of the racial, geographic, and gender context of global health leadership (more heads of global health agencies that went to Harvard than are Southern women?) have something to do with colonial legacies? How could it not? /11
Today's most powerful universities largely depend on a history and legacy of colonialism. Some more directly than others. My institution has been grappling for years with the reality that the continued existence of the University depended on slavery.../12 nytimes.com/2016/04/17/us/…
Meanwhile, back to vaccines for a minute... global health has not been neutral and cannot be divorced, even today, from history of tropical medicine.... Evidence? Why yes.../13
"1921-1956, W.African villagers were forcibly examined and injected with medications by colonial govts with severe, sometimes fatal, side effects...Turning to today, greater campaign exposure reduces vaccination rates and trust in medicine.../14 pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10…
So: Which countries are wealthy, with $ to create & buy vaccines is empirically linked to long-term effects of colonialism-->is major determinant of vaccine coverage today-->is linked to who is seen as having "capacity" and expertise.
Yes, #Decolonize /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Article out: Legal environ & #pandemic response. After 5yr global #HIV push on testing&treatment, countries that criminalized gay relat, sexwork, drugs had less success. Rights-protective laws, better outcomes
Biomedical & structural interconnected
A🧵/1 gh.bmj.com/content/6/8/e0…
Measuring legal approaches in world: @HIVPolicyLab data show some countries highly criminalize, some less so (only 20% criminalize all). Meanwhile rights-protective legal approaches: 23% have strong non-discrim, 39% ind. human rights inst., 79% enforceable GBV laws. /2
Dear @JoeBiden@KamalaHarris@SecBlinken@SecBecerra time for you to act. Sharing tech is good public health, it's good diplomacy. NIH-Moderna vax already paid for. It could show the power and relevance of government, US in particular. How about you...
1. Democratize vaccine production. I know you've already said USDFC is investing, take the last steps... and also foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/01/to-…
2. Use the authority you have. Not sure why you're NOT using the carrot and stick to get this done, but it's a bad look. Moderna has NO interest in these markets, has not even registered to sell there. You can use the Defense Production Act and... lpeproject.org/blog/how-to-va…
#Covax is failing. Big picture: even as delivers doses, it won’t deliver goal of EQUITY.
Short term: By June was to reach just 3% of LMIC pops. Delivered only 1/4 of that (88 of 337m forecast).
We need to talk about why & learn real-world, politically-informed lessons
🧵[thread]
The goal: at a high level, COVAX as a pillar of ACT-A aimed to “ensure that every country gets fair and equitable access to eventual #COVID19 vaccines…. By acting as an insurance policy.” At this point, it's clear this model has not been successful /2
Not #VaccinEquity: Dec 2, 11, 21 of 2020 UK, US & EU authorized #COVID19 vaccine.
6mos later, so many ways (data, stories, lives) to see inequity outcome of current vaccine prod & distrib systems.
Here's 👇from @fibke:% pop vs % vax does NOT approach equity /3
Breaking: South Africa’s vaccine roll out yet again in crisis b/c high-inc-based company failed to deliver vaccines. Millions of JNJ vax may have to be tossed out, so no vax for millions of seniors & vulnerable supposed to be vaccinated 2 wks ago. this has to be addressed...
...this is happening b/c USG-funded production of JNJ vax substance at Emergent which failed quality.
Aspen, the SAfrican company, has NOT gotten tech transfer to make the vax, instead they’re filling and finishing substance from JNJ (from Emergent)😞
@R_H_Ebright@amymaxmen@VanityFair pretty striking to have a once-eminent professor reduced to schoolyard name-calling in defense of problematic journalism... Not sure where that gets you, but ok here's what I read...
@R_H_Ebright@amymaxmen@VanityFair Article quotes trump admin official saying it “smelled like a cover-up” (innuendo). Any evidence of a cover-up? None given. Instead, evidence shows pretty clearly what Trump appointees were pushing didn’t pass basic basic scientific rigor so career experts refused advance it.
@R_H_Ebright@amymaxmen@VanityFair Article questions WHO’s independence because (innuendo) WHO didnt appoint US officials. From a government that had announced withdrawal from the WHO? That’s just silly.
Read 👇 Dear Journalism:Does this pass muster @VanityFair? Innuendo, implications, Eban teases as breaking story. Zero new evidence. Lots of fmr Trump admin people saying there's a cover up, with no evidence. How is this not just spreading misinformation? vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/t…
YES we need more info on #COVID#Origins. Yes a lab leak is a possibility, but as many have said it has not been high on priority b/c there is quite literally no evidence for it. Eban doesn't find any either. But she does fall for all sorts of canards...
For example, Eban falls for the one about how @WHO didn't appoint US officials suggested for the independent expert team. This has been being shopped around by Trump admin folks for months. Eban takes the bait, reports it as if it's a shocking piece of new information. But...