a very good morning to all CAAT-A college faculty!
& an absolutely terrible morning to whoever put together this trash fire of corporate lies for the CEC!
i...can't even believe someone wrote these bullet points with a straight face
hey CEC, let me fix ALL of these for you:
you say
"Labour stability and certainty."
but you mean
"The certainty of management blitzing past the bargaining table, imposing unilateral terms & conditions, then forcing a vote on an offer union membership has already rejected."
you say
"The maximum allowable increase under Bill 124."
but you mean
"The CEC agrees wholeheartedly with Doug Ford's decision to let public salaries fall behind the rate of inflation!"
(also: CAAT-A isn't asking for a pay raise, so this point is completely irrelevant)
you say
"Significant enhancements for priority for partial load employees"
but you mean
"The CEC refuses to offer partial load faculty bridging health benefits between consecutive terms OR to grant them basic seniority rights when renewing their contracts!"
you say
"Documenting coordinator duties and providing the employee freedom to determine what is acceptable"
but you mean
"The CEC plans to overwhelm coordinators with work & slowly siphon off their poorly-defined duties to administrators outside the the bargaining unit!"
you say
"Mechanisms to continue working on areas of concern together"
(like, could you be more vague??)
but you mean
"The CEC will hire a bunch of corporate consultants to do 'research' & run panels with no actionable outcomes or faculty input, guaranteeing zero progress!"
you say
"Neutral-chaired committees bla bla bla consensus bla bla bla"
when you mean
"This is the same as the last point! But let's say it again with more words and even less meaning!"
you say
"A comprehensive review of workload for both full-time & partial-load employees"
but you mean
"We haven't updated workload factors or conflict resolution protocols since 1985, so we better not start now! I know, let's hire some *consultants*"
you say
"Updates to the counsellor class definition"
but you mean
"The CEC can reduce or modify counsellor duties at any time, or contract their roles out to non-union gig workers! But don't worry, it's *multidisciplinary*"
you say
"Multidisciplinary teams in the College Sector"
but you mean
"Fewer full-time & union-protected jobs in the College Sector! More gig workers with minimal benefits, no labor continuity, & non-existent academic freedom! But let's also keep hiring more managers!"
you say
"Solution focused EDI work that builds on the work already underway at Colleges"
but you mean
"The CEC will continue extracting unpaid intellectual labor from marginalized faculty while offering no actionable policies or decision-making power!"
you say
"Meaningful engagement with Indigenous communities"
but you mean
"The CEC will appropriate the idea of decolonization from Indigenous leaders, but only if it has no impact on institutional policies! Also we refuse to be held accountable when we act in bad faith!"
you say
"A strong, sustainable college system"
but you mean
"A tuition-rich, academically empty, anti-student, anti-union cash cow for provincial profit-mongers!"
you say
"Putting students first"
but you mean
"Putting tuition first! If we don't get that tuition, how will Doug pay for his little red shovels? How will we pad the pockets of the private contractors we're selling the college system off to?"
TL;DR:
this is, imho, the CEC's biggest heap of bullshit yet.
-unconscionably dishonest
-pumped full of vagaries
-built on a foundation of distrust & impunity
please, whether you're faculty, a student, or a concerned community member looking for clarity on the upcoming forced offer vote:
instead of wading through the CEC's abject nonsense, check out this clear, concise video from @StandWithFac & @jp4opseu
the CEC is running out of time to sell their rancid agenda, & they're playing dirtier by the day.
pls be clear: there is NOTHING in their current "offer" that differs from the politically bankrupt, anti-student, privatization-fueled proposals they've been peddling all along
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i've tweeted about it a fair bit already, but i modeled & textured almost every object in "i don't think i've walked this stretch of road before" in #crocotile3d, an exceedingly rad #lowpoly, tile-based 3D design tool by @SpectreSkully
coming from a 2d #pixelart context, constructing volumes *from* tiles was remarkably accessible. as i got a lil more comfortable, distorting & dividing geometry & watching the ensuing texture chaos was a great way to learn more about uvs, etc
even without any conscious focus on optimization, i find that crocotile constantly encourages me to be thoughtful & sparing with color & form, & to squeeze use & value out of the same tiny tiles over & over
one of the common reservations i've heard about supporting continued labor action against ontario college management is that the terms of the CEC's upcoming "offer of settlement" (read: forced offer vote) don't seem *that bad*
let's dig into this a little:
without wanting to restate the obvious, the most fundamental issue here is that this "offer" was NOT obtained through bargaining;
it was unilaterally drafted by a corporate management body that has repeatedly refused compromise on ANY key issue raised by faculty union reps
if you have any stake whatsoever in labor rights (& frankly, if you're a working person, you should), it's important to understand what a terrible precedent this sets
the whole *point* of a union is to give employees a strong voice in shaping their working conditions
i don't want celebrities talking to me about mental health. they're figureheads of capitalism & individualism. they cannot, by definition, care about the collective good. i want my friends & family & neighbors & colleagues talking to me about mental health -- theirs, mine, ours.
i completely appreciate that rich powerful people also have emotional struggles; i hope they can find support where it makes sense for them. but i have no interest in the paper thin care discourses of millionaires whose public image is a celebration of the unattainable
we don't need pop culture to model or make visible things that thousands of brilliant, dedicated people with far less social power have been teaching us (often at a great cost to themselves) forever;
well, the CEC has gone and played the last, crumpled, worthless card in their bag of union-busting tricks: a forced offer vote
surprising absolutely no one, it's empty of compromise, self-satisfied in all the wrong ways, & extremely dangerous to faculty, students, & colleges
some colleges have already sent the "offer of settlement" to their employees (clotting up institutional channels as usual, as if management's communiques are simply statements of fact and not CEC propaganda)
perhaps the most important thing to state up front is that this is neither an OFFER nor a SETTLEMENT
it is an ESCALATION of the unilateral Terms & Conditions imposed in december; the final blitz of the CEC's attempts to bypass CAAT-A, fair bargaining, & faculty labor rights
apparently the CEC felt the need to blast college faculty with a weekend email full of the same chest-puffing truth-distortion that is rapidly becoming their exclusive brand
why are they so determined to bypass the bargaining table? why won't they negotiate in good faith?
the CEC is no longer maintaining even a pretense of negotiation. their only tactic at this point is to suggest that if CAAT-A is fully confident in their proposals, they should be willing to risk everything in a win-lose vote with the arbitrator
the real message here is that the CEC is so determined to have it *all their way*, they would rather face off in an all-or-nothing duel with CAAT-A than *do their jobs* and reach towards a compromise that college faculty & students deserve
this isn’t open & honest, it’s just more meritocratic mythmaking that sidesteps all the other structural prejudice & bottom-line thinking that pushes people out of these spaces before they even get started
maybe, MAYBE if you’re speaking in purely technical terms, it’s worth having a conversation about skill-level expectations, but it’s impossible to separate these from the economic & cultural conditions these industries are premised on
this thread basically comes down to “if i, a person who looks like the default dominant person in these spaces, deems your work lacking, this is an objective deficiency on your end which can only be made up for with more unpaid labor”