There's a lot of misleading claims on the internet about heat pumps in cold climates.

Many people think they stop working below 30 or 40F

But heat pumps can work efficiently as low as -25F.

So here's a thread debunking 3 myths about cold-climate heat pumps.

🧵 #energytwitter
Before diving into the myths, it's helpful to understand how a heat pump works on a cold day.

While it might not seem like it, on a cold day there’s actually some heat in the air outside.

That's true until the temperature reaches absolute zero (–459.67°F)
A heat pump basically captures that heat and moves it into your home.

So rather than create heat directly by burning gas or electricity, it uses a little energy to run some gadgets that *move* heat.
As a result heat pumps become a magic heating and cooling machine that effectively turn 1 unit of energy into 3 or 4 units of heat.
If you want to understand the science of this more, check out this video by @thisoldplumber and @ThisOldHouse.

For now, the key things to understand are:

1. Even on a cold day there’s energy in the air outside.

2. A heat pump moves that energy into your home.

3. The net result is a super-efficient heating system.
Alright, let's start mythbusting.

Myth #1 - Heat pumps don't have enough capacity to heat a home when it's freezing.

False.
As the weather gets colder, the energy required to keep a home warm (the load), goes up.
At the same time, the amount of heat that a heat pump can move into the home (the capacity), goes down.
But as long as the capacity is higher than the load, then a heat pump will work.

This is called the balance point.

In the example above, that's at about -7F.
For a well-insulated and sealed home, that number can go as low as -25F.

But of course, if you have a really leaky home or a bad heat pump, then you'll run into problems.
Most complaints about heat pumps not working in cold weather are the result of user error.

There are plenty of contractors out there that don't know what they're doing.

But if you know what you're doing, heat pumps can work well into negative temps.
Myth #2 - Heat pumps lose their efficiency advantage when the temperature drops.

In other words, heat pumps stop becoming a magic machine below freezing.

This is far from true.
The best way to see this is to look at the coefficient of performance (COP) of heat pumps at various temperatures.

As long as the COP is higher than one, heat pumps are the most efficient solution.
Take a look at the chart below that shows the COP of a @Mitsubishi_USA cold-climate heat pump during a series of tests in Alaska.
As you can see, until the temperature reaches -10 degrees fahrenheit, this heat pump would perform more efficiently than any other piece of equipment.
This is the case for virtually all cold-climate heat pumps.

Some of them can achieve COPs of more than one as low as -22F.

Even in extremely cold temperatures, heat pumps are incredibily efficient.
Myth #3 - It costs too much money to use a heat pump in a cold climate.

Once again, false.
Sometimes you'll hear contractors say, "When it gets cold your heat pump costs more to operate than X."

And some hours out of the year that might be true.

But for the most part, that's irrelevant.

What really matters is how much it costs over an entire month or year.
So let's look at some of that data.

According to @NREL, here's how much the average homeowner can save in some pretty cold states:
In fact, there are millions of homeowners across the country that could save $500+ per year by switching to a heat pump.

And many of them live in places that get very cold in the winter.

In most places, heat pumps are the most cost effective way to heat a home.
Alright that's all for now.

If you've read this far, please consider retweeting this thread to spread the word that heat pumps work in cold climates.
And if you want to dive into any of this further, here's the full article - carbonswitch.co/do-heat-pumps-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Thomas

Michael Thomas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @curious_founder

Jan 17
Wow, ~150,000 people read this thread on gas stoves.

Thousands of people said they had no idea. Many said they'd never buy a gas stove again.

Lesson learned: People care a lot more about their health than cutting carbon or saving energy.

For those working to #electrifyeverything this is so important.

Personally, I get caught up writing for and to the #energytwitter crowd too much.

Peak load this. Carbon intensity that.

The reality is that most people don't care about this stuff.
In home electrification, people care about:

- The health and safety of their family
- The comfort of their home
- A whole lot of other things...
.
.
.
- Saving some money on their utility bill
- More things
.
.
.
- And then cutting their carbon footprint.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
Well that thread certainly took off.

Lots of questions about ventilation, what monitor I used, and what you should do if you have a gas stove.

So here's... another thread 🧵

First, let's talk ventilation (i.e. range hoods, fans, etc).

The most common question I got was: "If I use my range hood am I safe?"

Yes and no.
All cooking -- whether you use gas or electric -- produces PM2.5 pollution.

Basically when you cook food, little particles that are smaller than a human hair start flying around your kitchen.

That stuff isn't good to breathe.
Read 16 tweets
Jan 13
Over the last two months I've read dozens of studies about gas stoves and indoor air quality.

I also installed monitors in our home and ran my own tests.

Here's a thread on what I learned 🧵 #energytwitter
First, I should admit that I was skeptical about the panic over gas stoves at first.

As a climate hawk, I was focused on the emissions.

Gas stoves are responsible for 0.12% of emissions in America. I felt like we should focus on the bigger stuff (furnaces and water heaters).
But then I learned about the negative health impacts of gas stoves.

Researchers have been studying this stuff for decades. And every year, it becomes more clear:

Gas stoves produce unsafe levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2). And that causes respiratory illnesses like asthma.
Read 16 tweets
Dec 23, 2021
3 years ago I started my company, Campfire Labs, and pledged 50% of the profits to climate advocacy.

Today I just sent ~$200,000 worth of grants bringing our total giving for the year to ~$300,000.

🎉🎉🎉

Here are some of the orgs we gave money to this year 🧵
.@theclimatevote for grassroots climate organizing and making effective climate action easy.

Here's a thread on why I love what they're doing:
.@rewiringamerica for developing and lobbying for federal policy to #electrifyeverything

@GriffithSaul and the Rewiring team have brought a ton of people into the climate movement by creating a new story that is more motivating than the old sacrifice narrative.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 30, 2021
I analyzed ~65,000 nonprofit tax returns to see where charitable dollars go in America.

I learned that environmental nonprofits receive less than 2% of all donations.

Here's what else I learned 🧵

#GivingTuesday #energytwitter
In 2020 Americans gave $471 billion to nonprofits.

Most of those donations went to the following categories: religion, education, human services, and health.

Environmental organizations received just $8 billion (~2%) — the least amount of any category tracked by the IRS. Image
Organizations working to reduce GHG emissions received only $2 billion.

That means 0.4% of all charitable donations went to climate mitigation.

Which is a huge bummer to say the least.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 12, 2021
Most banks use your money to fund fossil fuel projects 👎

But some banks use your money to fund #climate solutions like solar ☀️

I spent dozens of hours over the last few weeks trying to find the best climate-friendly bank.

Here's what I learned 🧵
1. Most banks are still pouring trillions into fossil fuel projects.

Here's how much the top banks have lent since Paris:

@Chase: $316 billion
@Citi: $237 billion
@WellsFargo: $223 billion
@BankofAmerica: $198 billion

Source: @RAN's latest report - ran.org/wp-content/upl…
2. Where you choose to bank has a direct impact on what projects do or don't get funded.

If you bank with @Chase or @WellsFargo, your money funds more oil rigs and coal plants.

If you switch to a sustainable bank, your money funds rooftop solar, wind farms, EVs, etc.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(