Bruce Y. Lee Profile picture
Feb 6, 2022 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Some have claimed that a "Johns Hopkins Study" showed that "lockdowns" have been ineffective against #COVID19 and there's been a "full-on media blackout" of this study.
Here I cover for @Forbes this & the problems with such claims
#epitwitter #scicomm
forbes.com/sites/brucelee…
2/THREAD As I detailed in my article, it's not even appropriate to call this working paper a "Johns Hopkins study" as @BadFoxGraphics pointed out. Only one of the 3 authors is affiliated w/ John Hopkins & the university didn't seem to commission or endorse this working paper.
3/THREAD Moreover, this so-called "Johns Hopkins study" was not a peer-reviewed publication in a reputable scientific journal. It's a working paper. BIG DIFFERENCE Anyone can upload a working paper to a website, as long as they have access to the Internet & opposable thumbs.
4/THREAD By the way, only one of the 3 authors of this so-called "Johns Hopkins study" is affiliated w/ @JohnsHopkins in any way. All 3 are economists. It's not clear how much experience w/ epidemiology, medicine or public health any of them had before the #COVID19 #pandemic
5/THREAD Therefore, rather than touting the institution Johns Hopkins, instead look specifically at who the authors of this working paper are, what their backgrounds are, what specifically they're saying & what actual evidence they provide to support their claims
6/THREAD So what about the specifics of this so-called "Johns Hopkins study?" Well, as I wrote in the article for @Forbes --> @GidMK detailed the various flaws in this working paper in a tweet thread & @AndreasShrugged tweeted the following:
7/THREAD Of the 34 “studies” included in the working paper's review, 12 were actually working papers & 14 were from economists with only one being from an epidemiologist. Something is NOT a true meta-analysis when you've skipped most of the major relevant peer-reviewed studies
8/THREAD Regarding the claim that there has been a "full-on media blackout" of this so-called "Johns Hopkins study," as I described in the article there's no evidence that this has been the case. Plus, how exactly would such a "blackout" actually occur? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bruce Y. Lee

Bruce Y. Lee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bruce_y_lee

Mar 9, 2022
1/THREAD -- Maintaining face mask use until shortly after reaching particular #COVID19 vaccine coverages could save the U.S. billions of dollars--per our new study in @TheLancetPH thelancet.com/journals/lanpu…
cc: @PHICORteam @CUNYSPH @PeterHotez @mebottazzi @BCM_TropMed @bcmhouston
2/THREAD -- Consistently maintaining mask use until >70% of the population is vaccinated vs #COVID19 & then ~ 2-10 weeks afterwards could prevent many, many #coronavirus cases, hospitalizations & deaths + save businesses, the health care system, insurance, taxpayers, etc. money.
3/THREAD-- This goes against the false narrative that face mask use somehow hurts the economy. In fact, it's quite the opposite ---> investing in providing face masks & encouraging their use can end up helping the economy by preventing direct medical costs & productivity losses
Read 11 tweets
Oct 27, 2020
President Trump suggested that doctors are inflating #COVID19 #coronavirus death counts in order to make money. Seriously? As I describe here for @Forbes there are many reasons why such assertions make absolutely no sense. #MedTwitter 1/THREAD

forbes.com/sites/brucelee…
First of all, as I wrote, many doctors have been suffering throughout the #pandemic including, as @CTZebrac has documented, some dying from #COVID

2/THREAD
forbes.com/sites/brucelee…
Secondly, there is no real evidence that #COVID19 #coronavirus deaths are being deliberately inflated. If anything, as I described here for @Forbes there may be undercounting

3/THREAD

forbes.com/sites/brucelee…
Read 6 tweets
Mar 11, 2020
1/5 Beware of “back-of-the-envelope” ✉️ calculations that try to predict how many ppl will get sick or die from #COVID19 #coronavirusoutbreak , especially when they’re done by ppl who have little experience in #infectiousdisease modeling. The current situation is not that simple
2/5 Many different factors may affect the spread of the #SARSCOV2 #coronavirus . These include different assumptions about the virus characteristics (which are still emerging), how much the virus has already spread (which is unknown since widespread testing is not occurring yet),
3/5 ...how much ppl are mixing, washing their hands, & practicing other infection control measures, and what the government & other organizations are currently doing & will do in response. These all can significantly affect the spread of the #COVID19 #coronavirus
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(