#SupremeCourt to hearing PIL seeking enforcement of Fundamental Rights under Article 14 and 21 of students who are specially abled, with regard to conduct of online classes/examination by Educational Institutions. #COVID19
The petition is moved in light of the change in pattern adopted due to the ongoing pandemic, focussing on challenges faced by students with disability.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati submits that we have filed an affidavit, most of the institutions under the department are being followed by the suggestions made by the petitioner.
A committee has been formed to formulate guidelines.
Bhati- We are requesting if this can be called up after 3 months.
Adv Sanchita Jain appearing for the petitioner submits, we appreciate the steps taken by the Government, our 2 suggestions are that the Committee may include students with disability and the people from Information Technology field.
Justice Khanwilkar- That decision may be taken by the authority. It is in your suggestions.
Jain- I myself is disabled and I would tell with my experience that suggestion of disabled would be valuable as they are the stakeholders here.
Court- We find this suggestion to be worthy to be considered. We defer the hearing till April, 2022.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Senior Advocate Nakul Dewan appearing for amazon mentions Amazon matter stating that, we wish to file brief written submissions.
CJI- You want to complicate matter we have no issue, order is ready now you want to file affidavit, we'll have to issue notice we'll also give opportunity to other side.
I don't understand what is this practice.
Senior Advocate KV Viswanathan submits Milords we are opposing.
CJI- Mr Viswanathan you are for the other side, if you want to file, you also file.
CJI- It's a luxurious litigation it appears.
How many pages is going to be?
Delhi High Court will today start hearing a batch of petitions demanding registration of first information reports (FIRs) against several politicians for their role in instigating the #DelhiRiots.
Sr. Adv. Colin Gonsalves for one of the petitioners: We have submitted a compilation.
HC: There are prayers like provide food etc to affected families, ensure protection and safety of affected families of #DelhiRiots, these are not relevant anymore.
#Karnataka High Court to hear case of Resham Farooq, filed through her brother seeking relief on account of alleged denial by the Government PU college for 8 girl students allegedly on account of wearing Hijab before a bench of Justice Krishna Dixit #KarnatakaHijabRow
Devdatt Kamat, Sr.Adv requests for listing of fresh writ petition which was moved yesterday challenging the GO. Court permits for listing of this matter with other similar matters . #KarnatakaHijabRow#karnatakahijab
AG for #Karnataka says he is ready to argue #KarnatakaHijabRow
Abhishek Janardhan counsel for petitioner: I seek for a short date for matter milords as there are other cases coming.
J
ustice Dixit: The quantity of matters does not matter,if we decide one matter, the rest is good
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing a batch of petitions challenging provision of Prevention of Money Laundering Act. #PMLA #MoneyLaundering
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for the petitioner- In terms of the act: Use, Projecting and Claiming it to be untainted are three heads, without your Lordships finding these three heads it would be stretching of an offence to bring Money Laundering.
Singhvi: To suggest it to be diluted (the three heads) would not be a correct way of interpreting it. #PMLA #MoneyLaundering
BREAKING: The District and Sessions Court, Haridwar has granted bail to Yati Narsinghanand, the head priest of Dasna Devi temple (Uttar Pradesh) in 'Haridwar Dharam Sansad' alleged hate speech case. @ISalilTiwari reports lawbeat.in/top-stories/br…
Note: Some News portals have incorrectly reported that Narsinghanand has been granted bail in a case registered u/s 295,509,323,504, and 153A of the Indian Penal Code.
In the instant case, he was arrested only for offences u/s 153A and 295A.
Important observations by the court: 1. The court has noted that the prosecution itself has accepted that the informant in the instant matter, Gulbahar Khan, was not present at the Dharm Sansad. He filed a case only on the basis of a video he saw on Facebook.
The Madras High Court grants bail to a suspected Maoist on condition that she would file a sworn affidavit in Tamil owing faith and allegiance to the Indian Constitution and stating that she does not believe in Maoism. #MadrasHighCourt
Court said that in cases where people wedded to a certain ideology are involved, they do everything possible to prevent the conduct of the trial and such things remain unknown to the media or the outside world. #madrashighcourt
“On account of such dilatory tactics adopted by the accused, evidences disappear eventually leading to their acquittal. At that time, there will be a hue and cry saying that the system, without any material thereof, had kept the person in prolonged incarceration," court added.