#SupremeCourt to hear the curative petition filed by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL) against a July 2019 judgment of the apex court upholding the termination of a power purchase agreement (PPA) by Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd @AdaniOnline#AdaniPower
The case relates to Adani Power’s termination of the PPA with GUVNL citing GMDC’s failure to supply it coal. The Gujarat State Electricity Regulatory Commission and later an appellate tribunal held the termination ‘illegal' #SupremeCourt
AG KK Venugopal: Parties have settled the problem and they seek to modify the statement. There was a claim of 10,000 crores compensation and it now stands withdrawn. So we pray for settlement to be recorded.
CJI NV Ramana: Once we have taken up the curative and don't interfere in the judgment then how can we modify the judgment. You want it to be disposed off based on settlement.
AG: The court can invoke Article 142 and put an end to the dispute.
Adv Mahesh Agarwal: We have agreed to continue to supply 2000 Mega Watts power to the state on disposal of the case by the bench.
CJI: Question is how can we not interfere in the judgment and modify it.
AG: powers in the review and curative is same as based on Hoora verdict
CJI: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam etc .. all of the settlements affidavits signed by officials only?
AG: It's signed by the General Manager, Commerce. Joint President of Adani Power Mundra has also signed the affidavits
AG: They are fully authorised. Hoora verdict itself says that curative covers the same area as review and even SC rules say curative cannot raise a fresh ground which was not raised in review
Sr Adv C Aryama Sundaram supports AG: There is no restriction on the powers of the curative court if viewed under Article 142
Justice UU Lalit: Parties have entered into compromise and we will say we dispose off settlement in terms of the settlement which was filed by signatures of competent persons. We proceed that both parties have now entered into settlement
Justice UU Lalit: We will say inter se relationship between parties will be governed by the terms of the settlement
Justice Surya Kant: Yes the idea is to not keep it dragging
CJI : After notice was issued, it appears parties have settled and filed a joint application recording the settlement deed dated 3.1.2022. after hearing, the settlement deed is taken on record.
CJI: In view of settlement deed, we dispose off the curative by saying that both parties will be governed by the settlement deed. #SupremeCourt#AdaniPower
Sr Adv Sundaram and AG KK Venugopal appears for Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam and Adv Mahesh Agarwal appears for #AdaniPower
Justice Kaul: so many courts have already noted that Forensic labs are lacking in numbers. You are a premier investigative agency and this is the condition.
Justice Kaul to ASG SV Raju: Also i dont want to recieve whatsapp messages concerning the case. Some one sneaks into my groups and leaves messages. We don't want to get into all of this.
Raju: I am a also a victim of this. Even I recieve such messages
#SupremeCourt notes that there are 19 cases where the accused has either passed away with appeals pending against their conviction or had already fulfilled their complete term of imprisonment
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea regarding a challenge to the upper-age limit for the NEET exam. The plea challenges the upper-age limit of 25 years for general category and 30 years for the SC/ST category candidates appearing in #NEET
Adv Gaurav Sharma appears for the respondent: the requirement if two year continuous study of 11th and 12th was always there
Sharma: The affidavits filed by the petitioners clearly show that they were aware of 11th and 12th class. In the present case students passed 12th but did not clear 11th
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by @amazon against a January 5 Division bench order of Delhi HC staying arbitration proceedings initiated by Amazon before a Singapore tribunal even when the tribunal proceedings were underway
Staying arbitration proceedings, the Division Bench stated there is a “prima facie case” in favour of the Future group companies in view of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) suspending its clearance given to Amazon’s 2019 deal with Future Coupons (FCPL) #AmazonvsFuture
CJI NV Ramana: sorry to say that papers have highlighted my observations. But future also wants to drag the matter. Anyways issue notice and list it next week #AmazonVsFuture