@CUAHSI Given: (1) COVID-19 impacts on hydrologists (& researchers in general) are widespread, real, & continuing; (2) Institutional adjustments (e.g., tenure clocks) may not mitigate all impacts of the pandemic;
@CUAHSI (3) Hydrologists’ careers & contributions are diverse. Consequently, COVID impacts on research activity will be variable; (4) Moreover, hydrology values a diverse body of products and outcomes
(image below by @domciruzzi)
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi Aside: See @CUAHSI statement on holistic evaluation of research in the hydrologic sciences for a more comprehensive list of contributions, disruptions, & products valued in our field doi.org/10.4211/hs.21e…
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi Given:
Early evidence of pandemic impacts on hydrologists: Drop in papers submitted to WRR since Q3-2020, an early signal of the lack of new research being completed during the pandemic.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi More early evidence of pandemic impacts: precipitous declines in submittals to WRR relative to pre-pandemic norms.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi NOW FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART – HOW DO WE PROCEED AS A FIELD? It is our hope that this comment provides a citable basis to organize discussions and validate the impacts being reported by members of our community.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To those applying for positions, promotions, tenure:
Consider the breadth of impacts on your career, using this document as a basis to organize your thinking, particularly across the breadth of contributions and outcomes that exist in our discipline.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To those evaluating and hiring:
Evaluations should be written in the context of COVID-19 impact, acknowledging the acute and long-lasting impacts on the candidate.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To those evaluating and hiring:
In evaluation letters, consider it your obligation to discuss the hydrology-specific issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic that were faced by the candidate and contextualize these experiences in the discipline.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To those evaluating and hiring:
It is essential to highlight impacts that may not have been ubiquitous across all disciplines to educate review committees whose composition frequently spans a diverse array of intellectual backgrounds.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To review committees & senior faculty:
Take seriously the concerns raised by candidates & reviewers when you ask COVID-19 impact statments on research, teaching, mentoring, & service. Consider them with care & intent as impact statements require significant time & effort.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To academic & professional leaders:
Use your position to voice support for the inclusion of the full breadth of research products and contributions that are valued in our discipline and consider how COVID-19 impacted them.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To academic & professional leaders:
COVID-19 effects are non-uniform, meaning uniform policies may exacerbate inequalities. Focus on supporting groups that have been especially impacted, & taking care to address individuals' needs rather than applying generic, universal policies
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To funding agencies:
Program officers should continue to proactively engage with their communities to understand pandemic impacts and identify creative ways to mitigate the impacts.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi To funding agencies:
Future review panels must explicitly consider COVID-19 impacts as research progress, products, and experience by PIs may have been delayed or diminished.
@CUAHSI@domciruzzi Finally – while COVID-19 catalyzed this comment, these principles should guide the way we evaluate and value contributions from our field moving forward.
@MollyRCain@pkumar3691@IMLCZO@IUONeillSchool@IUImpact FAVORITE FIGURE IN THE PAPER:
Interacting 'top down' (antecedent soil moisture) and 'bottom up' (GW level) control the sources, ages, and N loads in water mobilized from tile-drained landscapes.
@MollyRCain@pkumar3691@IMLCZO@IUONeillSchool@IUImpact What controls C-Q dynamics in tile drains? Event size and antecedent conditions (in this case, if the groundwater table was high enough to have the tile flowing with pre-event water when the storm hit)
Participating in a Emotional Intelligence, Masculinity, and Gender Allyship workshop. Live tweeting between discussions to share what we (men who want to be better allies) are talking about. An unstructured thread:
Biggest fears:
Will my stepping up be perceived as paternal and make the problem worse?
Does my standing up for equity mean that telling others they are 'wrong'? (i.e., how to be an ally w/o telling someone they are discriminating)
Unsure what kinds of responses are appropriate.
More fears:
am I mansplaining gender discrimination?
unsure if I am in a position to help
will my support seem genuine or performative?
Recently tenured and planning for full professor? I am. A thread of what I find the most useful outcome of participation in @IASatIU's Recently Tenured Working Group Program. @iuimpact 1/ ias.indiana.edu/research-suppo…
@IASatIU@IUImpact A quick disclaimer. This is my plan for my school as I see it at this moment. Any and all could change tomorrow, for your circumstances and goals, etc. I’m sharing because I found the exercise useful, not that my ideas are complete nor correct. 2/
@IASatIU@IUImpact What does it take to go up for full professor in your school or college? Actually go find the documents and copy the language out from them. Example for a case based on ‘Excellence in Research’ from @IUONeillSchool below 3/
Faulty - @zoom_us failure got you down? You can get live and instructing with Google Hangouts. Here's a quickstart guide you can download, and I'll also post the individual steps in this thread. Lets all do our best to help our students! @IUONeillSchool dropbox.com/s/gk2953l0errp…
Step 1: Go to hangouts.google.com and sign-in. You can use whatever account you want. I'll show how this looks for an @IndianaUniv account. Click 'Sign in'
Step 2: Finish the sign-in process. Here you can see a screenshot of what my .@iu.edu authenticaon looks like. Your might just be a google log-in or maybe your institution has a custom interface like this. Doesn't matter. Just get signed in.
Join us in just 45 minutes for our undergrad panel - hear from students how the transition to online education went for them. Our panelists are ready to give honest feedback to help instructors prepare for next semester. #hydrology@CUAHSI zoom.us/webinar/regist…
Plus - have a question you want answered? Tweet it at me or @skuylerherzog - we'll ask the panel and report back on this thread!
What are we learning so far?
1 - Professors are trying. Even if it hasn't been perfect, the effort is noticed and appreciated.
2 - Synchronous meetings are helpful. 100% asynchronous is lonely and doesn't help students isolate key points from 'noise'