In today's thread, I'm going to excavate some fascinating data on Omicron vs Delta from a CDC article. On its face, it's a garden variety sermon on vaccination
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…, but it contains other interesting data that wasnt discussed by the authors.
2/ bear with some preliminaries so that the precise point is understood when I get to it. The underlying database is 222772 visits ("encounters") by adults to 383 US emergency depts and urgent care clinics and 87904 hospitalizations at 259 hospitals from Aug 26/21 to Jan 5/22.
3/ Delta variant was predominant for most of period; Omicron rapidly became dominant in Dec and, by Jan, Omicron (rather than vaccination) had more or less eliminated Delta. While authors stratify results by "Delta" and "Omicron" periods, unfortunately they didnt quantify lengths
4/ to be more precise, the underlying dataset is ED and UC "encounters among adult with COVID-19-like illness*" , defined as "acute respiratory illness (e.g., COVID-19, respiratory failure, or pneumonia) or related signs or symptoms (cough, fever, dyspnea, vomiting, or diarrhea)"
5/ for four distinct vax statuses and for both Delta and Omicron dominant periods, they showed total encounters, hospitalizations, COVID cases and COVID hospitalizations.
If they'd given lengths of each period, we (or they) could calculate daily rates. Why was this omitted?
6/ later, I'll try to approximate this calculation. In meantime, perhaps the most obvious question about Omicron vs Delta is percentage of hospitalizations - which, overall, dropped from 42.2% in Delta period to 8.7% (!!) in Omicron period. Why didn't authors show this?
7/ the hospitalization percentage dropped dramatically in ALL vax categories: boosted, fully vax, and unvax alike.

There's something else that's surprising in this data. I'll explain after I have coffee.
8/ Here's something odd. We hear repeatedly that unvax are hospitalized at MUCH greater rate than vax (see Ontario Sci Table below), but in CDC report, % hospitalized among triple vax is higher than among unvax.
Comparison is not apples-to-apples, but, for now, shows complexity
9/ unlike most datasets, this CDC dataset includes information on "non-COVID" hospitalizations of people with "COVID-like" symptoms. And, somewhat surprisingly, it turns out that non-COVID accounts for ~80% of COVID-like hospitalizations.
10/ columns for COVID hospitalization show expected decrease in COVID % hospitalization. But look at "Not COVID" hospitalizations (calculated as total "COVID-like" minus COVID). In Delta, 55.7% triple vax visits with COVID-like symptoms hospitalized, but only 1.4% COVID cases
11/ this same phenomenon continued into Omicron period but at MUCH lower levels: from visits with COVID-like symptoms, COVID hosps were lower (0.6% vs 2.5%) for triple vax vs unvax, but total hosps higher (13.3% vs 6.5%).
12/ while the decrease in % hospitalized COVID in Omicron period is startling, what is perhaps just as startling is the corresponding decrease in non-COVID respiratory hospitalizations.
13/ I don't know why - this can't be deduced from statistics. However, from purely statistical and analytic perspective, I think that this is an elephant-in-the-room question that ought to have been addressed by authors, whose preoccupation with vax wars made them inattentive
14/ while we mostly hear about COVID hospitalizations, this table shows rest of story for visits with COVID-like symptoms: not-COVID hosps, not-hosp COVID cases, not-hosp and not-COVID. Huge increas in both not-hosp COVID cases AND not-hosp not-COVID cases.
15/ a couple of points on extrapolation of this data to Canada: the proportion of vaccination in Canada is MUCH higher than in this US data.
Also, hospitalizations in late-December and January in Canada were higher than preceding Aug-Dec period, opposite to this US data.
16/ @rupasubramanya drew attention a couple of weeks ago to an Ontario special study that showed that vast majority of hospitalizations in December were Delta, rather than Omicron, even though Omicron rapidly became dominant in last two weeks of December.
17/ she (IMO sensibly) argued that Omicron would be as mild in Canada as it was elsewhere and attributed the surge in Canadian hospitalizations in late December to effect of lingering Delta, rather than Omicron being uniquely severe in Canada
18/ be that as it may, this US study, like similar studies elsewhere, indicates that hospitalization and severe outcomes from Omicron are so much less than from Delta that sensible public policy requires that the two variants be tracked separately in health statistics.
19/ there's a very ironic outcome that illustrates the combined cynicism and divisiveness of Trudeau's recent politics.
20/ During past month, the purpose of vaccination has been re-framed as a national effort to reduce hospitalization rates (rather than transmission, which it was no longer accomplishing.) But this US (and other) data indicates that Omicron reduces hospitalization rates even more.
21/ not just that, but Omicron has wiped out Delta. In a few weeks, Omicron accomplished something that months of vaccination failed to do.
22/ If hospitalization rates under Omicron, even for unvax, turn out better than we were able to attain for Delta even with boosters, shouldn't we be ending mandates and lockdowns (like the rest of the world), rather than doubling down on lockdowns and ostracizing the unvax?
23/ Trudeau and public health authorities constantly lecture us to "follow the science". But to follow the science, Canadian public health authorities need to publish up-to-date and honest data stratified by variant, vax status and age group. But we don't get that from Trudeau
24/ earlier today, I promised to make an estimate of daily hospitalizations during Delta and Omicron - information CDC should have provided. For stipulated Omicron periods from 6 to 20, I plotted implied daily values for Delta and Omicron for Total Visits, HospCovid, HospNon, etc
25/ from prior knowledge, we would expect Omicron period to begin in mid- to late- Dec. Thus, choice of k range.

For all such k values, daily COVID hospitalizations in Omicron are ~25% of corresponding rate in Delta. This also applied to daily non-COVID respiratory hosps.
26/ jump down to last panel - daily Visits. k<11 implies more visits during Omicron than Delta; k >11 implies more visits during Delta than Omicron. Based on (much) higher daily hosp rates in Delta, it seems unlikely to me that daily visits would be lower in Delta. (Fig revised)
27/ Omicron length (k) under 20 days (especially under 15 days) imply much higher daily (3-4 x) rates of COVID visits WITHOUT hospitalization in Omicron than in Delta. This is consistent with reduced severity.
28/ a CDC Omicron period of 11-14 days also implies slightly higher not-hospitalized for non-COVID cases in Omicron period, but in the same range.
29/ overall, I estimate that the "effective" Omicron period length contained in CDC data is about 11-14 days. And would be VERY surprised if I were more than 5 days wrong. It's crazy that they didn't report this.
30/ bottom line is that implied DAILY hospitalization rates for COVID and non-COVID respiratory visits are MUCH lower in Omicron period than Delta period for this CDC dataset

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen McIntyre

Stephen McIntyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateAudit

Jan 24
UK has published some relatively detailed data showing "unadjusted" rates of case infection of boosted vs unvax by age group.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… As context, Ontario SciTable only shows "adjusted" case rate purporting to show unvax rate as twice that of vax (2 or more doses)
2/ in ALL UK ages above 30, "unadjusted" case infection rate for triple-vax was HIGHER than among unvax. These results troubled UK authorities who printed unadjusted unvax rates in light gray, warning "comparing case rates ...should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness"
3/ the UK conclusion that "comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against infection" will come as news to Ontario SciTable and other authorities which regularly use such data in briefings
Read 14 tweets
Jan 16
Quebec, in midst of draconian lockdown, (unlike Ontario) publishes new hospitalization data by age group, vax status msss.gouv.qc.ca/professionnels…

These are real counts, neither "normalized" relative to population nor "adjusted" by Ontario Science Table (or CDC). What do you notice? Image
2/ the most obvious observation about new hospitalizations is that (unsurprisingly) they are dominated by seniors and particularly over 80s - a group which is almost totally vaxxed.
3/ a secondary observation is that, in younger agegroups, number of new hospitalizations among unvax is pretty similar to number of new hospitalizations among vax, even though population of unvax is much smaller. This is consistent with primary messaging from governments.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 12
in response to recent threads in which I showed actual vax and unvax case counts (not just per million), I've been abused by many commenters for my supposed failure to understand "data science 101" - that ONLY per million matters and only a moron would look at counts.
2/ I suspect that most of the abusive commenters are much younger than me and thus fail to consider why actual counts of fully-vax cases are of particular concern to someone who is fully vax and in a vulnerable age group (like me.)
3/ Nearly every 80+ and 70+ in Ontario was fully vax in Dec; yet there was unprecedented explosion of cases among seniors in mid-Dec. This is NOT due to almost non-existent unvax seniors. I wish it were. Yes, the few unvax are at more risk. But they arent causing senior caseload
Read 15 tweets
Jan 11
the actual operating problem for Ontario govt - what puts pressure on hospitals and ICUs - is most likely the dramatic resurgence of cases among Ontario seniors, even including 99.99% fully-vax 80+s.
2/ it is well known that hospitalization and ICU rates for senior COVID cases are FAR higher than younger cohorts. In Toronto, where fine-grained data is available, 34% of cases among 80-90s are hospitalized; 25% of cases among 70-79s hospitalized, 5.8% into ICU
3/ in November, the priority of federal government and Science Table appears to have been vaccinating 5-11 year olds, as opposed to boosting seniors. "Younger" seniors (60s and 70s) mostly wer not eligible for boosters until December due to 6-month federal regulation.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10
today's Ontario cases are down almost 50% from Jan 1 max. Fully-vax cases accounted for ~85% of all cases; on a per million basis, fully vax cases still are higher than unvax cases. SciTable shows increasing cases, with "adjusted" unvax cases exceeding vax cases on per MM basis.
2/ here is today's NON-ICU hospitalizations, absolute and per million, by status. About 75% of non-ICU hospitalizations are full vax, flipping ratio that applied earlier in pandemic. Relative unvax rates remain higher.
3/ to estimate "excess" unvax non-ICU occupancy, I calculated what non-ICU numbers for unvax "should have been" if they had same relative occupancy as full-vax. It was ~100 extra for most of 2021, now ~150. This is 8% of present 1925 non-ICU occupancy.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 9
today's disinformation from Ontario Science Table. Local to me, but prob representative of science advice elsewhere. Left- ACTUAL hospitalization data by vax status. Right - hospitalization infographic from Science Table. Look at difference,
2/ up to mid-Dec, actual COVID hospitalizations were dominantly unvax, with only handful of full_vax. In last 3 weeks, reported hosp'ns exploded, with vast majority being two-plus vax. While unvax proportion is higher, "problem" arises from absolute count. Which is now mostly vax
3/ SciTable infographic implies that onslaught of hospitalizations is coming from unvax, with vax hospitalizations making only a minor contribution. No wonder politicians are demonizing unvax. While unvax "over-contribute", they are not driving the increase. Contrary to SciTable
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(