Marc Bevand Profile picture
Feb 8 12 tweets 6 min read
A little thread on the Great Disinformer @ianmSC

Why Real Science™ isn't done with MSPaint charts.

His charts seem to claim that nothing works. Locking down doesn't work, masking doesn't work, vaccination doesn't work, your printer doesn't wo—wait scratch that one

1/n
One iota of critical thinking is all you need to expose numerous errors in his charts:

Error #1 — Case ascertainment rate bias:

A country may detect 1 in 2 cases, while another 1 in 4. We say the case ascertainment rate is respectively 50%, and 25%.
This variance in case ascertainment rate alone is enough to put half of @ianmSC's charts where they belong: in the trash🗑️

Real Science™ looks at covid deaths—not cases—to compare the severity of the pandemic across different regions. This avoids case ascertainment rate bias.
Error #2 — Fails to consider the counterfactual:

Without lockdowns, without masks, without NPIs, we have quite solid evidence by now that the situation would be even worse. See published Real Science™:
If infections continue to accelerate after a measure (eg. masking) is enacted, it doesn't imply that the measure is ineffective

Often, authorities enact a measure when they see a growing threat (eg. arrival of a more infectious variant).
The counterfactual in this case, a more infectious variant arriving WITHOUT a measure in place, would mean infections accelerating even more than they are growing WITH the measure.
Error #3 — Apples🍎 to Oranges🍊

That's something @ianmSC loves to do. He compares country X to country Y, slaps labels on a chart ("X had mask mandates", "Y didn't"). Somehow he thinks the observed differences in pandemic severity is due to only that one thing (masks)
@ianmSC But in reality a multitude of other factors matter just as much:
- population health
- density
- household size
- ingress of visitors (who seed infections)
- even income disparity, education... are big factors that correlate to covid deaths per capita

@ianmSC ignores all that
@ianmSC Error #4 - Logic/math errors

@ianmSC believes that adding the infection rate per capita across different vaccinated populations (1 dose, and 2 doses) gives the infection rate in the overall vaccinated population

High-school math fail🤦‍♂️

@ianmSC Now, someone having such a severe misunderstanding of basic rate calculations explains why @ianmSC never takes the discussion one level beyond just presenting a simplistic chart... I don't think he feels comfortable doing it
@ianmSC Another logic error:

On an occasion where @ianmSC seemed cognizant of the case ascertainment rate (the 11x factor below), he thought it was a constant that didn't change through time
@ianmSC Another logic error (3rd one): he compute the IFR incorrectly by failing to account for some lags

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Bevand

Marc Bevand Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zorinaq

Feb 7
I compiled a list—as exhaustive as possible—of all peer-reviewed & published research articles that evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions, specifically lockdowns on COVID-19

➡️Papers finding NPIs effective outnumber, by 8 to 1, those finding the opposite
Criteria for inclusion in the list:

1-Be a RESEARCH ARTICLE (data, methods, results). Commentaries, opinion pieces, etc, do not qualify

2-Be PEER-REVIEWED & PUBLISHED among the 26,000 titles in Scopus

3-Be EXPLICIT. No secondhand interpretation of the data
Regarding criterion #3: the authors must explicitly state in the text whether their results suggest NPIs are effective or not

Their exact words have been peer-reviewed & published. Your interpretation of figures or data tables has not.
Read 61 tweets
Jan 24
Heads of government who have died of COVID-19

Confirmed:
1. Prime Minister of Eswatini, Ambrose Mandvulo Dlamini

Suspected:
2. President of Burundi, Pierre Nkurunziza
3. President of Tanzania, John Magufuli
4. Prime Minister of Ivory Coast, Hamed Bakayoko
1. Prime Minister of Eswatini tested positive on 15 Nov 2020, was hospitalized 8 days later, and died on 13 Dec.

bnonews.com/index.php/2020…
2. President of Burundi died on 8 June 2020. The cause of death was given officially as "cardiac arrest" by the Burundian government, but is suspected to be COVID: economist.com/middle-east-an…

His wife was flown to Kenya and hospitalized for COVID a week before his death.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 18, 2021
10 years ago @apenwarr wrote "Why bitcoin will fail"

BItcoin is up 15,000x since then, so he published a blog update admitting it may take "more than 50 years" to fail

Me too I can predict anything will fail within X years, if X is large enough 😀
apenwarr.ca/log/20211117
More seriously, he makes really illogical poorly-explained arguments.

1. "Bitcoin doesn't work because of Scams"

There are tons of scams on this thing called "Internet." Does it mean Internet doesn't work?
2. "Bitcoin doesn't work because Citizens use it to move money out of authoritarian regimes"

Well, that's by design. Bitcoin is meant to be censorship-resistant. That's working as expected 🤦‍♂️
Read 7 tweets
Oct 29, 2021
I am excited to report a discovery:

I found a 521-km sightline from Pik Koroleva. This makes it the 2nd longest sightline on the planet:

Start point 41.080000,77.769167 (Pik Koroleva, elevation 5800 m)
Bearing 188.914568°
End point 36.449604,76.867903 (elevation 6416 m)

1/n Image
This 521-km sightline was found using a custom multithreaded program that is currently crunching through 2.4 million viewpoints. It will complete the full analysis in about 90 days

Above rendering is from panorama generator udeuschle.de/panoramas/panq…

2/n
This finding supersedes my previous finding of a 510-km sightline:

3/n
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2021
Let's pick apart this preprint and see if Peter's claim holds.

I spent less than 1 minute scanning it, and I'm pretty sure it is flawed, but I'm going to review it live on Twitter
Peter highlights "For boys 16-17 without medical comorbidities, the rate of CAE is currently 2.1 to 3.5 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk"

CAE = cardiac adverse event
First, the claim is very specific:
- not all kids, just boys
- not all boys, just 16-17
- not 16-17 boys, just those with zero medical comorbidities

So, from the get go, this implies all other kids could probably still be vaccinated and this being less risky than COVID-19 itself
Read 14 tweets
Jun 20, 2021
I updated my chart comparing the fatality of covid vs flu

(data & source code: github.com/mbevand/covid1…)

Notice the new curve "Brazeau" which is 1 of the most comprehensive & recent analysis suggesting covid is more fatal than the flu even at ages as young as 5 years old Image
All the official sources behind this chart are referenced in the README file:
github.com/mbevand/covid1… Image
The US CDC did update their estimate of the covid IFR on 19 March 2021 (they increased it quite significantly). I missed that update.

Here is the chart with that latest update: Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(