David North Profile picture
Feb 8 7 tweets 2 min read
Your reply is as nonsensical as it is dishonest. If you were opposed to war, you would have written a column calling on Germany to reject US threats against Russia and the expansion of NATO into Ukraine. 1/
Instead, your column cynically mocks the persistent and deep-rooted anti-war sentiments among the German people, and refers to opposition to the use of German weapons against Russians as a "catechism." 2/
You reject references to the horrors of World War II - in which Germany killed tens of millions of people - "as not particularly useful in the 21st century." You should be ashamed of yourself for writing such words. 3/
Though they may be of no interest to you, "historical arguments" about the crimes committed by the Nazis and the Wehrmacht will remain relevant and haunt the memory of mankind throughout this new century and for centuries to come. 4/
The United States & NATO are not interested in "helping Ukraine to defend itself." This is sheer propaganda that conceals the geopolitical, economic and social interests that motivate its threats against Russia. 5/
The United States - which blatantly violated international law when it invaded Iraq and Afghanistan - is no more interested in the fate of Ukrainians than Hitler was in the fate of Sudeten Germans. 6/
Before issuing further demands for a more aggressive German foreign policy, perhaps you should spend time studying the history of World War I and II. The works of the great historian Fritz Fischer would be a good place for you to begin your education. 7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David North

David North Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidNorthWSWS

Feb 11
In his support for #1619Project historical falsification and #MeToo witchhunting, Jeet Heer remains true to the traditions of the publication for which he writes, The Nation. 1/
This rotting flagship of American liberal reformism is ineradicably marked by its endorsement in the 1930s of the Moscow Trials and the Stalinist terror, which resulted in the extermination of the entire generation of Russian Marxists who had led the 1917 October Revolution. 2/
Trotsky described the editors and writers of The Nation as the "priests of half-truths," that is, as the most cynical of liars. Trotsky related their alliance with the Stalinist bureaucracy to the political and intellectual bankruptcy of American reformists. He wrote: 3/
Read 13 tweets
Feb 9
Glad that you (and many other scientists) are now reading the WSWS. But you wouldn't be surprised by its content - "among the most truthful and reliable" - if you had been familiar with the writings of Trotsky, who ranks among the greatest thinkers of the 20th century. 1/
Murdered by a Stalinist agent in 1940, Trotsky personified - as did Lenin and Rosa Luxemburg - the great socialist culture of the early 20th century that educated the working class, thus enabling it to act as a historically aware and politically conscious revolutionary force. 2/
The disastrous response to the pandemic and its tragic consequences cannot be explained apart from the absence of a mass socialist movement based on the working class, which would declare war on #Covid19 and the criminal corporate/finance-dictated policy of #herdimmunity. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Feb 7
As a Trotskyist-socialist opponent of the Putin government - which arose out of the restoration of capitalism in Russia - I am obligated to protest against former Ambassador McFaul's promotion of the US & NATO's dishonest warmongering narrative. 1/
Amb. McFaul denounces "unprovoked, preventive war." How, then, would he describe the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan by an "imperial power" against two countries with a long history of colonial subjugation? 2/
He ignores the fact that the 2002 US National Security Strategy adopted the policy of preventive war. The Bush administration asserted the right of the US to wage war against any possible potential threat. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Feb 6
With brutal cynicism, the US gov't and media are feigning concern for the "grim death toll" (NYT) should Russia invade Ukraine. But they are doing everything they can to provoke a war, which the US & NATO clearly want. 1/
Ukrainian lives mean nothing to the war-mongerers. The NY Times predicts the deaths of 25,000 to 50,000 Ukrainian civilians. But these lives are mere small change in the geopolitical calculations of US imperialism. 2/
In defense of the interests of Wall Street, the Trump and Biden administrations refused to implement necessary public health policies, resulting in the #COVID19 deaths of nearly one million Americans.Since January 1, 2020, the #pandemic has claimed approximately 60,000 deaths. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 5
3,000 US troops are pouring into Poland, stationed in bases as close as 50 miles from Ukraine. It is now obvious that the Biden administration concocted the Russian invasion narrative as a cover for a long-planned massive increase of US forces in East Europe.#UkraineConflict 1/
The #NYTimes claims that "Mr. Biden is not readying for war with Russia." Really? Are American soldiers being deployed to freezing Poland for winter R&R? Biden, the NYT writes, "has no intention of sending US troops to Ukraine." The words "no intention" do not mean "will not." 2/
In the mouth of a president, "no intention" creates a moral distance between decisions and their consequences. Lyndon Johnson claimed he had "no intention" of sending soldiers to Vietnam, but then wound up sending them in the hundreds of thousands. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Feb 4
In another of its virtually daily denunciations of China's #ZeroCovid policy, the NYTimes makes the following extraordinary statement: "China’s strategy would obviously not be possible in a country that emphasizes individual rights as much as the U.S. does." 1/
The conclusion that flows inexorably from this declaration is that "individual rights," as understood by the US ruling class, is opposed to - and certainly held to be more important than - the protection and saving of lives. 2/
But what about the "individual rights" of the one million Americans who have died because of the government's refusal to implement effective public health measures? The only "right" left to a dead person is the right to be buried. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(