Thread by @TheUfoJoe

1 Some folks can't handle some of the more "out there" ideas/theories/speculation on this subject & they wind up arrogantly mocking them. In 2020, when I was talking about DeLonge saying the intelligence behind #UFO feeds off our negative emotions, this was one of the responses👇🏼

https://twitter.com/LtTimMcMillan/status/1293797723955748867

2 Tim is far from alone in dismissing that type of hypothesis but DeLonge is far from alone in suggesting that MIGHT be what's going on. You have Rudolf Steiner, Carlos Castaneda, @g_knapp & Kelleher in HFTS, Ray Boeche, long-time paranormal researcher, Paul Eno and others.

3 Is there any evidence human emotions can somehow affect the physical world and be measured?

~

This is from "The Energy Cure" (TEC) by Bill Bengston. Page 244. REG = Random Event Generator (Or, Random Number Generator - Puts out 1s or 0s. Like flipping a coin)

4 TEC: "In other experiments w/REGs, California psychiatrist Richard Blasband demonstrated the effect of emotion on REGs. In 1993, he placed an REG in his office at a distance of ten feet, during a total of thirty-nine therapeutic sessions with eight volunteer patients. The

5 TEC: "sessions were also videotaped by an unobtrusively placed camcorder to provide synchronized feedback. Analysis of the combined data indicated that the REG distinguished three psychological states: neutral when patient & psychiatrist were merely talking; a greatly elevated

6 TEC: "REG output resulting in an upward shift on a graph when a patient was angry or elated; and a lowered output creating a downward shift when a patient was crying, anxious, or depressed. In both the PEAR lab & Blasband experiments, human intent or emotion was the paramount

7 TEC: "cause of measurable, replicable physical effects. Researchers theorized that an unexplainable resonance between humans and machines had been demonstrated. Through their millions of experiments, PEAR researchers were led to the conclusion that any definition of reality

8 TEC: "must include the influence of consciousness as an active agent, at least on an equal footing with the senses."

Some food for thought. No pun intended! No amount of mocking will keep me from exploring these or any ideas. All options on the table.

amazon.com/gp/product/159…

9 What about the observer effect in quantum physics, & the double slit experiment? The outcome of that experiment is altered when an observer is present. Is that idea also too "out there" for some folks?

This isn't supposed to happen. But it does.