BREAKING: Hindu Sena intervenes in ongoing Hijab Row before Karnataka HC, says Freedom of religion not absolute in secular democracy. Adds that "Narrative being sought to be built up that India and Hindus have become intolerant" & personal law cannot prevail over Constitution.
Wearing Hijab or Bhagwa dress give colour to religious importance, is contrary to Constitution of India and therefore, educational institution are within their powers to ban any dress which represent any religion in educational institution: Hindu Sena VP to Karnataka HC
Petitioners cannot establish supremacy of their religion by using Hijab (Burka) in educational institutions. Hindu’s respect all religions... expected from members of other communities to reciprocate the same maintain public order, tranquility: Hindu Sena VP to Karnataka HC
“dress code prescribed by educational institutions are with motto to uphold the secularism of Indian Constitution, duty of each & every citizen of India to uphold the secularism as per provision of the constitution,” Hindu Sena VP to Karnataka HC #HijabRow lawbeat.in/top-stories/ka…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Special Bench of #KarnatakaHighCourt will shortly resume hearing plea(s) by girl students challenging alleged ban on wearing #Hijab in government PU colleges in Udupi district. Ravivarma Kumar,Sr.Adv, is expected to resume his arguments today. #HijabRow#HijabControversy
While @Devadattkamat concluded his arguments yesterday. The court pulled up a lawyer appearing for the petitioners for filing an application with his affidavit as opposed to that of his client’s #HijabRow#HijabControversy
BREAKING: 765 persons including lawyers, law students, academicians and social activists express deep concern with the interim order of the Karnataka HC restraining all students from wearing religious clothing and condemn the violation of constitutional rights of muslims.
Open letter states that they “hang their heads in shame” after having been witness to ‘public humiliation of Muslim students and staff, who are being forced to remove their hijab before entering schools and colleges, purportedly on instructions of the district administrations’
Open letter by 765 persons states that HC order restraining students from wearing religious clothing ‘proceeds on an understanding linked exclusively to the right to freedom of conscience, enshrined in Article 25 of the Constitution’ & not on golden triangle of Art 14,19,21 & 15
#SupremeCourt hearing pleas challenging the Madras High Court judgment which had declared the 10.5% internal reservation to the Vanniyar community under the existing 20% reservation to Most Backward Classes by Tamil Nadu Government unconstitutional. #VanniyarReservation
Bench: We are not inclined to the argument of referring the matter to a larger bench, you can start your arguments.
Due to non availability of Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi the petitioner are seeking a short accomodation.
The bench has asked other counsels to continue with their submissions.
[Loudspeaker ban] Gujarat High Court issues notice on a PIL plea seeking a statewide ban on loudspeakers in mosques.
On a plea moved by a doctor who runs his clinic in state's Gandhinagar district, Chief Justice Aravind Kumar led bench issued notice to the Gujarat government.
The doctor had alleged that people who live nearby any mosque are made subject to great inconvenience and disturbance.
The doctor had demanded the practice to be prohibited stating that despite the fact that due to covid protocols, many of the namaz offerees are not reaching mosques for the prayers, the mosques are using loudspeakers during prayers.
Sr. Adv. Ranjit Kumar for petitioner: Your lordships reposed a confidence upon SEC for free and fair election. Unfortunately that has been belied.
For the remaining 108 municipalities, therefore pass appropriate orders.
Kumar: while the whole election process is going on, they wanted to influence voters by taking advantage of door-to-door schemes and the SEC allowed this!
📢Tomorrow - Arguments in the bail plea by counsel for Umar Khalid expected tomorrow in the #DelhiRiots larger conspiracy case(s) before Karkardooma Court. Tune in for live updates. #umarkhalid
Hearing will take place before a bench of ASJ (Additional Sessions Judge) Amitabh Rawat. #umarkhalid#DelhiRiots