2012: Perkins Coie (the same law firm that helped write ✍️ Hinman’s #Ether Free Pass Speech) informed @chrislarsensf#RippleCredits (aka #XRP) IS NOT a security;
The 2012 memo warned Larsen there was a risk under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA);
The 2012 legal memo 📝 stated that the law firm’s “analysis has never been tested by FinCEN in practice, and therefore reliance thereon is not without risk”;
The Perkins Coie 📝 was spot on b/c in:
2015: FinCEN sued @Ripple claiming it had violated the BSA;
FinCEN’s suit against Ripple was the first civil enforcement action against a cryptocurrency industry player - a case of true first impression in the industry;
Ripple settled paying 700K and agreed to comply w/ NON- SECURITIES regulations;
Ripple was classified as a Money Service Business (MSB) and pursuant to the binding federal agreement, Ripple stipulated:
“Any sale or transmission of XRP by Ripple Labs or any of its subsidiaries shall be conducted ONLY through an entity registered with FinCEN”;
In 2015, pursuant to this binding agreement w/ the U.S. Federal Government, #XRP was declared to be “convertible virtual currency”;
On June 13, 2018, SEC enforcement lawyers wrote a legal memorandum 📝 analyzing whether #XRP was a security under the Howey test;
After conducting this in-depth legal analysis of #XRP, the SEC enforcement staff DID NOT recommend filing an enforcement action against Ripple;
The next day, on June 14, 2018, Bill Hinman delivered the #Ether Free Pass Speech that Lowell Ness of Perkins Coie helped write ✍️;
Two months after the June 13, 2018 #XRP memo and #Ether Free Pass Speech, on August 20, 2018, @bgarlinghouse and @JoelKatz met with Hinman and Clayton;
At this meeting Brad Garlinghouse loudly spoke out:
“Ripple is living in purgatory over the lack of clarity with #XRP”;
After Garlinghouse spoke out about the lack of clarity regarding #XRP, neither Clayton nor Hinman provided any clarity by claiming the SEC considered #XRP a security;
2 months after the #XRP Memo 📝 & #Ether free pass and face to face w/ Clayton and Hinman - they said nothing;
After the FinCEN fine and settlement, and for FIVE and 1/2 more years, #XRP was openly and publicly traded on over 200 exchanges worldwide including in the United States 🇺🇸;
Also, the SEC allowed its employees to trade or own crypto assets - including #XRP - without any restrictions similar to the ones in place related to owning securities;
In fact, up until 2019, even SEC enforcement lawyers could own #XRP without seeking permission or advice;
Also, in 2019, the United States’ largest exchange, @coinbase, went to the SEC in January 2019 informing the SEC that Coinbase had run #XRP through its stringent regulatory framework and determined #XRP NOT a security and intended to list #XRP - unless instructed otherwise;
The SEC did not disagree and on February 28, 2019, Coinbase listed #XRP;
18 months later, on Dec. 17, 2020, former SEC Chief Grundfest sent Clayton, @HesterPeirce, Elad Roisman, @SECHerrenLee, Commissioner Crenshaw & others a letter pleading not to sue Ripple over use of #XRP;
Grundfest explained that everyone behind the decision to bring a suit against Ripple and #XRP was leaving the SEC;
Hinman left a week earlier; Clayton was leaving on Dec. 23, 2020; Marc Berger, Director of Enforcement and someone who helped write ✍️ the Complaint was leaving;
The Director of Trading and Markets was also leaving within weeks;
Grundfest characterized these departures as a mass exodus never before seen of senior staff responsible for bringing a lawsuit as they walked out the SEC’s door🚪 and that this exodus raised obvious concerns;
Grundfest explained that there was absolutely no exigent reason to rush the lawsuit considering #XRP had been traded for almost 8 years;
Grundfest pointed out that after a 2 1/2 year investigation, the SEC did not allege a single instance of fraud or misrepresentation;
Grundfest stated if the SEC filed suit it would cause multi-billions in damages to innocent holders of #XRP with no connection to Ripple and that this harm to innocent holders would be the most significant in the history of the SEC in a non-fraud case;
Grundfest stated the SEC should not bring an action against #XRP and leave #ETH untouched b/c the SEC could not make a material distinction between #ETH and #XRP;
Grundfest was the perfect person to acknowledge the similarity between #XRP and #ETH b/c he had acted as an adviser to the #Ethereum founders - he served as a liaison between #Ethereum and the SEC before and after the #Ether ICO;
Grundfest, himself, stated that if the SEC brought an enforcement action under these circumstances, it would raise serious concerns about the Commission’s exercise of discretion - Grundfest questioned whether there was improper motive behind the suit;
On December 21, 2020, Clayton met with @GaryGensler, suspected to be appointed by Biden as the next SEC Chairman;
The next day, on Dec. 22, 2020, despite the warnings and concerns of Grundfest, via reporting by @CGasparino & @EleanorTerrett, Clayton voted against his fellow Republicans (Peirce & Roisman) and w/ democrats (Herren Lee & Crenshaw) in a 3-2 vote to file the case.
The next day, Clayton left the SEC forever. His firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, represented @ConsenSys & @ethereumJoseph in its purchase of Quorum and the #JPMCoin - a direct competitor of Ripple and #XRP. Clayton also went to One River after its $1B bet on #BTC and #ETH.
After collecting $15M in “retirement” benefits while at the SEC from Simpson Thacher, a member of the EEA, Hinman “un-retired” and went back to Simpson Thacher. Hinman brought with him Enforcement Director Marc Berger who also became a partner at Simpson Thacher.
Oh, I almost forgot:
Hinman also became a partner at @a16z with the same people that helped write the #Ether Free Pass speech.
But he must’ve forgotten those #Ethereum folks b/c he met with them 6-8 times btwn Dec. 2017 & June 2018, but stated repeatedly that when he looks at #Ethereum he doesn’t see a third-party promoter pushing for the adoption of #Ethereum. Yea, he’s probably never heard of Web3.
Now read the fact timeline👇as well and I challenge anyone to try and defend the SEC’s conduct b/c you can’t. Some of you may still believe Ripple violated securities laws but no rational person can argue #XRP itself is a security per se or that the SEC has acted in good faith.
Below is an honest question that many have. I’ve seen a lot of negative comments lately about the judges. Your frustration is misplaced. Plz know, I understand everyone’s anger. But people are unrealistically expecting the judge, on her own volition, to throw out the case.
That’s not how it works. The judge rules on motions that are filed before her. @Ripple has not filed a motion to dismiss the case for any type of wrong-doing. The judge only knows about conflicts of interests and appearances of impropriety b/c I submitted a declaration citing it.
To be candid, the only reason I was able to cite to those conflicts is
b/c the SEC attacked me personally - trying to paint me an unhinged Twitter conspiracy theorist. Unless Ripple files a motion to dismiss based on all of this info, the judge isn’t going to just throw it out.
What’s lost on many people interviewing Gensler (no offense intended) is that he keeps saying the platforms and exchanges need to come in and register. But you only register w/ the SEC if you’re selling securities. Gensler is thus calling all of these assets securities.
If @jespow met w/ @GaryGensler & the SEC and he listed out every crypto asset offered on the @krakenfx platform and asked:
“Which of these assets do you believe are securities and I will remove them”, he would be told by the SEC:
“We do not provide that type of guidance.”
Yet, Jesse or @JpThieriot or any other CEO of a digital asset platform, is expected to register that they are selling securities even if they do not believe they are selling securities.
After leaving the meeting w/ the SEC, Jesse can expect a subpoena, followed by a lawsuit.
This 🧵 is for non-#XRPHolders & those who dislike @Ripple or believe #XRP is a shit coin b/c of how it was created. This 🧵 is also for entities that hold themselves out as so-called leaders w/in the Crypto Community, promoting blockchain technologies.
Before you celebrate or ignore the significant implications surrounding the filing of the lawsuit, you should consider that BEFORE the @SECGov sued NOT ONLY Ripple but de facto every #XRPHolder (as stated by Judge Netburn) the following facts and information was known:
DBS, Singapore’s largest bank and the 6th largest bank in the 🌍, declared #XRP better & faster than #SWIFT.
DBS launched a digital exchange between four fiat currencies - $SGD, $HKP, $JPY & $USD - and the four most established cryptocurrencies - #BTC, #ETH, #XRP and #BCH.
That’s the question being asked by SIXTY-FIVE THOUSAND #XRPHolders who have joined together to NOT allow the SEC or Ripple to speak for them.
As amicus curiae, we intend to speak for ourselves.
65K #XRPHolders from 60 different countries across the globe 🌏 and the United States 🇺🇸 have come together to dispute the claims being made regarding the Digital Asset #XRP. I’ve literally been in contact with thousands of #XRPHolders who refute the allegations made by the SEC.
Here are the facts and the truth being ignored by the SEC and the lawyers involved in the case:
1) the majority of first time #XRPPurchasers were actually unaware of a company called Ripple and it’s use of #XRP;
I’ve tagged Mr. Dixon once or twice and I guarantee I was reciting 💯 provable facts. For ex, Clayton instructed Dixon to put together a crypto working group to write a memo to send to Hinman and the memo’s Safe Harbor only mentioned #ETH.
Block me, but try to prove me wrong.
It should be noted that I have never been disrespectful. I’ve tagged @VitalikButerin also reciting facts. For ex, when I’ve tweeted about Vitalik stopping the trading of ETH, I’ve always included that he did so w/ good and honorable intentions. The truth is the truth.
As amicus counsel in the @Ripple case, I’m interested in the truth as it relates to #XRPHolders. Nothing more, nothing less. For ex, many people tagged me about a civil lawsuit 🆚 @ConsenSys and @ethereumJoseph. I didn’t comment b/c it has nothing to do with the #XRP case.
Outstanding job @davidamichaels. Its not hyperbole to describe the @SECGov 🆚 @Ripple case as the most significant non-fraud enforcement action in modern history.
Please consider the following:
1) There’s no bigger topic in global trade & finance than digital currencies;
2) #XRP was the 3rd largest cryptocurrency in the world when this case was filed;
3) Hinman, Clayton, @HesterPeirce and others at the SEC, have all publicly stated the underlying token is NEVER the security, yet, in this case, the SEC argues #XRP itself is a security per se;
The SEC’s argument is the functional equivalent of arguing that the individual oranges 🍊 were securities in the seminal 1946 Supreme Court case of SEC 🆚 Howey. It’s an absurd argument violating 76 years of U.S. securities laws.