I’ve just found out my friend/mentor/person I love/ person I look up to…..

Is an abuser.

A 🧵

#coercivecontrol
#DomesticAbuse
#bullying
#sexualassault
Someone has just told you that the person you know, the person who is your friend, your mentor, your confidante, your loved one, your family member, your associate, your colleague, your volunteer, your fundraiser, your boss, your priest, your therapist, your teacher

is an abuser
What do you do?

Believe the victim. That’s how it goes, right?
Believe the VICTIM.

But this doesn’t SOUND like the person you know.
This doesn’t sound like the person you love, respect, look up to, admire, rely on, depend on, collaborate with.

This doesn’t sound like them.
And you KNOW them, right? You KNOW they wouldn’t do what they have been accused of.

You KNOW, just KNOW that they would never be violent or abusive or bullying or rape.

You KNOW this BECAUSE you DON’T make friends with rapists and abusers, right?

You ONLY befriend GOOD PEOPLE.
You KNOW this because you would KNOW if a person could do this.

YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO TELL!

And you would NEVER choose to befriend/love/admire/look up to an abuser and perpetrator.

I mean, what kind of person would that make you?
No, it must be a mistake. You KNOW it’s a mistake.
You’ve never seen them bully or be mean ( unless they were tired or had a bad day and then it’s understandable, right? )
They’ve never tried it on with you, never put their hand on you inappropriately,

so there is NO WAY they could do it to someone else, right?
There’s NO WAY they would be a bad person, I mean, they had a bad childhood, have overcome ADVERSITY, or they work TIRELESSLY for disadvantaged people.

They are relentless in their charitable giving. They are a pillar of the community. They are famous.

They MUST BE GOOD!
It must be a mistake, or the person making the accusation has lied.

Yes, that’s what it is- they lied.

They have an axe to grind, they are out for revenge, they are
bitter, or mentally ill, or evil.

Yes, THEY ARE THE PROBLEM
QUESTIONING the person you love/look up to/admire/collaborate with /work with/rely on

Would mean that you don’t trust them.
They would think you are disloyal
And you don’t want them to think that.
And it would mean you would have to do something about it
You couldn’t just ignore what you know and pretend you didn’t know it, could you?

No, don’t even think of that, put it to one side.
It’s not worth thinking about.
But WHAT IF you did think it?
It would mean changes to the status quo.

It would mean leaving the person you love - who’s been accused of rape.

It would mean informing on the person who is paying your salary

It would mean bringing to an end the business you both cofounded

It would mean losing status
And QUESTIONING THEM would mean you’d have to ask yourself: WHY DIDN’T I SEE THE SIGNS?

And you’d have to start questioning YOURSELF.

And what it says about you that you didn’t see it.

And why you didn’t see it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Coercive Control & Recovering From Trauma

Coercive Control & Recovering From Trauma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CCCBuryStEd

Dec 4, 2021
Marital rape.

A 🧵
#coercivecontrol
Despite the historical myth that rape by one’s partner is a relatively insignificant event, causing little trauma, research shows that partner rape often has severe and long-lasting consequences for women.
History:

The traditional definition of rape was, ‘sexual intercourse with a female not his wife without her consent’ and it was not until 1991 that rape within marriage was recognised in law in England and Wales.
Read 23 tweets
Oct 16, 2021
The red flags of dating that seem romantic.
🚩 ❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️

A THREAD 🧵
1/ He insists on picking you up from your home because he is * a gentleman*.
2/ He insists on making all the choices. The venue/the food/the wine.
Read 16 tweets
Sep 25, 2021
He hasn’t hit me or punched me or strangled me or threatened to kill me.
He hasn’t done any of that, he’s not like that. He’d never hurt me. He’s not like that.
He doesn’t hit me. He’d never hit me.

But he pushed me against the wall, when I got a text from a boy and said he was jealous.

I blamed myself for making him feel sad and stopped talking to this boy.
Read 17 tweets
Sep 9, 2021
Have been trying to manage the biggest panic attack in a long time. Up for hours. Struggling to breathe.

Not posting this for sympathy, but to illustrate the very real ongoing impact of trauma & the often time-consuming nature of regulating. Recovery often is not linear.
🧵
I rarely get severe panic attacks during the day. I know my body well enough to recognise symptoms in the earlier stages and prudent enough to know not to ignore the warning signs when they appear.

Ignoring them because I’m too busy is simply not an option.
I still get panic attacks when I am asleep and waking up scared out of my wits - hyperventilating and with my heart racing is still a regular occurrence.

And it’s not something I have been able to prevent/control.

Believe me, I have tried.
Read 25 tweets
Sep 3, 2021
Little nuggets of truth that no one teaches you and that you have to find out yourself.

A THREAD
People showing empathy aren’t necessarily empathic.
Some are able to approximate empathy.

It’s important to recognise the difference and to be aware that some convey it to manipulate and/or harm.
People who give to charity aren’t always charitable.

There are those who genuinely want to help others and then there are those who only do it so it reflects well on them.

Or because they want to be recognised for it.
Read 13 tweets
Jul 25, 2021
Review of research and case law on parental alienation
by @julie_doughty Nina Maxwell and Tom Slater,
Commissioned by Cafcass Cymru April 2018

A précis:

THREAD
*Parental alienation* was first recognised by Wallerstein and Kelly in 1976, but Gardner’s assertion in 1987 that parental alienation was a syndrome - a mental condition suffered by children who had been alienated by their mothers, which has led to debate over the last 30 years.
Despite a wealth of papers written by academics, legal and mental health professionals, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the topic.
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(