🧵Reading about the latest #TuckerCarlson vs. #AOC incident, I’m amazed at some recurring themes.
Note, I am NOT commenting on who is right or wrong. The two of them can handle that without me.
But the twitter commenters . . . ¡Aye, Carumba! Do none of these people think?
Theme 1): ‘I get my own legal code’.
Lots of people making announcements on what is and isn’t “protected speech” without taking a few minutes to do a quick search on what the law actually is. All kinds of pronouncements about “that isn’t protected” are just wrong.
2) ‘We should just reinstate the Fairness Doctrine.’
Never occurs to these people that the FD was proclaimed in the 1950s, when there was no cable or satellite TV, a country of three to seven television channels. There’s a real good chance the Supremes would squash this.
3) ‘Make Fox News hurt itself publicly.’
The Supremes have consistently held that forced speech is a violation of free speech. Highly unlikely you can require an announcement that says in effect ‘This show is bullshit’ past the Supreme Court.
4) ‘This will only effect the Bad People I dislike.’
Not only will the Supremes uphold a ‘This show is bullshit’ announcement before every Fox broadcast, they will also uphold it being applied only to Fox. #CNN, #MSNBC, etc. all get a pass on the public humiliation ritual. 🤣🤣
5) ‘Letting the courts determine the Official Truth is the answer.’
Yes, imagine the CURRENT Supreme Court deciding what people are allowed to say, and what they can’t say. That will obviously work out marvelously.
🤡🌎
6) ‘Make the cable companies let me opt out of having #FoxNews in my cable package.’
But they’ll be able to require those who want to watch Fox to pay for #CNN etc. The Supremes would have trouble ruling this unconstitutional, they’d be laughing so hard.
What these things all have in common is a complete disconnect from the Constitution, specifically that pesky First Amendment. It would probably have to be repealed before any of these “solutions” could go into effect.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The “harm” was a teacher telling the truth. She pointed out that “Some of the books filling our libraries make it seem simple, or even cool to take puberty blockers or opposite-sex hormones.”
She later said “This book is misleading because it does not take into account how Shane might feel later in life about being infertile. This book makes very serious medical interventions seem like an easy cure for emotional and social distress,” the teacher said.
She saw them as age inappropriate and (apparently) untrue.
Piatkowski ruled that saying these things is “transphobic” violates “the human rights code” and does “harm” to someone.
Canada is headed for dictatorship. It has been conquered by the forces of #evil.
It helps if you look at the history of the word “race” in the OED. It is a very vague term that meant at various times “family”, “ethnic group,” “nationality,” “species,” and the current meaning of “major human anatomical group based on skin color and other cosmetic features.”
I should also mention for completeness sake the political mean associated with Noel Ignatiev, “evil oppressors who must be overthrown to create the communist paradise.” By this definition, the Irish were not white till they came to the U.S. and discriminated against blacks.
It’s something Ignatiev and other socialists made up to attack contemporary society. Historically, the Irish were always “white” in the U.S. Till the 14th Amendment was passed, immigrants could not be naturalized a citizen unless they were white. The Irish had no trouble there.
It’s because of them thinking World 2 is the entirety of reality.
“World 1,” World 2,” and “World 3” are terms from Sir Karl Popper, one of the great philosophers of the 20th Century. Worlds 1, 2, and 3 are respectively physical reality, social reality, and logical reality.
The thing is, Worlds 1 & 3 are not under are control, but World 2 is. We can’t alter the law of gravity by human will, or the Pythagorean theorem. But we can alter the govt. of the U.S.’s fundamental structure by will, and we have, twice, in 1781 and 1788.
But people have trouble keeping the three straight. They think they can change human nature and the societies it gives rise to by just wishing for it to happen.
There’s a lot of talk about following #science, but little realization that science frequently leads you places
#Propaganda#protip: Never underestimate the power of the Big Lie. There have been NO studies about the implications of this, long term, because there CAN’T be. They would have had to sit on the #vax for YEARS to conduct them. We’ll find out the implications in future years.
Did you know the word “cisapride.” It’s the name of a drug introduced to the U.S. market in 1993, and ‘voluntarily’ withdrawn from the market in 2000. (It’s still available for vet use). Why was it withdrawn? It kills people. OOPS!
How did it ever get approved?
There were deaths among the test subjects in the clinical trials. But there didn’t seem like a lot of deaths, it was plausible that they were coincidental, so the regulators made a judgment call and approved it.
. Almost NOTHING of what Senger points out as misinformation appears in the WaPo piece.
And of the one or two claims that do make it in, there is no hint whatsoever that the claims might be false.
The CDC has stated that the vaccinated can catch and spread the disease, e.g., but Kagan’s statement to the contrary is not challenged.
Another egregious example is in this Vox story; vox.com/2022/1/7/22871…. The #Biden administration apparently claims that covid is more deadly than smallpox, yellow fever, or cholera. That is complete nonsense, unbelievably wrong.
And this stinking pile of 💩 reveals her inner nature. She is full of resentment and envy, and took the opportunity of a horrific quintuple murder to display what she thought was wit.
Truly #evil. Utterly #disgusting. The Twitter rules prevent me saying more.
And look at THIS imbecility, where she can't understand what she did wrong, and says her remarks were in "bad taste." As if anybody on Twitter cared about taste.
Note also how she tries to cover herself with "free speech," and how her "accepting responsibility" lie
is contradicted by the whining in the tweet above.
Let's look at her "bad taste." Here's one example, which she has since deleted. "No one" @tweettruth2me tweeted : "When your political ideology means more to you than human life, you have lost your way." Lemanski's reply: