#BJP
K. Annamalai, the Man to follow in Tamil Nadu's Politics!
He is Yogi Adityanath of Tamilnadu! 😍 Honest and dedicated to serving the people.
Many times I had explained that all state elections are different and have three component
Fundamentals
Perception
Engineering
K. Annamalai, is truly a transformational leader who is focused on fundamentals. He is a Change Leader. He doesn't shout Modi Modi all the time and ride on his back but creates new ground for the organization by tangible work
Whereas in another southern state Karnataka, Tejasvi Surya is a transactional leader who is driven by perception. and the shelf life of Perception is very short limited to event. I use to have hope from Tejasvi but it is now getting evaporated if he doesn't change
When I met Tejasvi before 2019, I told him he will be MP in 2019 but this would mean a huge responsibility as you have to work on the ground miles away from perception politics and Media but unfortunately, success when in his head too fast and uncontrolled.
I still have hope form him, let's see. Infact CT Ravi is far better politician to lead Karnataka in coming years and both are very dear to me
but AS OF TODAY, he is NOT a future Prime Minister material for sure
Sample changes in Tamilnadu are visible
DMK lost deposits in 60 wards despite its 13 Party Grand Alliance.
DMK got one vote in a ward in Eraniel. BJP won in Eraniel by massive margin.
BJP comes to power in Thenthamaraikulam Town Panchayat by crossing the majority mark.
BJP wins in Tambaram, Chennai which is DMK stronghold ever since its formation.
BJP wins 7 out of 11 wards in Pudupatti municipality in Theni.
Kamal Haasan’s MNM candidate polled “0” votes in Ward No.1 in Sivagangai town.😂🤣
DGP
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
John Mearsheimer, a professor of international relations and security at the University of Chicago has for years been cautioning American diplomats to stop pressing for Ukraine in NATO.
He argued that it would be akin to Russia setting up military bases in Canada. Would the USA accept it? We saw how the USA was ready to go to war when the Russians placed missiles in Cuba in 1962.
The mistake the West made was to assume that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had no great power security concerns. Big mistake!
John Mearsheimer, a professor of international relations and security at the University of Chicago has for years been cautioning American diplomats to stop pressing for Ukraine in NATO.
He argued that it would be akin to Russia setting up military bases in Canada. Would the USA accept it? We saw how the USA was ready to go to war when the Russians placed missiles in Cuba in 1962.
The mistake the West made was to assume that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had no great power security concerns. Big mistake!
Ukraine: Excellent. The West has been asking for this since thirty years, and Ukraine ever since Obama, Biden and Hilary put their fascist stooges in power there through regime change.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, in 1992, Madeline Lewinsky Clinton began to demonize Russia and put Russia under siege while infringing into its space.
He did this because the US needs Russia as a bogey man to (1) give NATo a sense of purpose and keep it together to make the US look much bigger and more powerful than it is, (2) Keep the US-NATO military Industrial complex ticking over and (3) to keep the US pulp fiction hate…
#Leadership
The Leadership Paradigm: By Example, by Empowerment and by Educating.
India awaits a new Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) 75 days after Gen.Bipin Rawat tragically died in a helicopter crash. It would seem the government is unable to decide?
What should we be looking for in the next CDS?
From bees to dolphins to elephants, many wild animals live in cooperative groups ruled by a single leader. And, as is the case in human societies, these rulers take different pathways to power.
In the animal world, pack leadership is by natural selection. You are born an alpha or you fight for leadership. When it comes to groups’ nature has decided that they are better off led by one or a few. What differentiate these groups are the pathways to leadership.