A thread on an experience I had in 2004 with a Russian General. 1/12
In returning from Iraq in 2004 as a one-star general, I was assigned as the commander of the US Army Training Center in Grafenwoehr, Germany. Beautiful place, and one of my favorite jobs during my career. 2/
This is a place where we conducted training and exercises with US forces, but my boss had given me the task to turn it into a multinational training center for our NATO allies and other partners. 3/
We had an exercise that year with Canadian, Brit, French, Ukrainian and Russian troops called “Torgau” - named after the town where Soviet and US Troops linked up during WWII to complete the encirclement of Nazi forces. 4/
As I said, I was a 1-star, and I was hosting a bunch of generals from all the countries for the final day of the exercises. We invited the Russian Ground Force commander - not thinking he would come - but he responded he would send a 3-star, colonel-general. 5/
Coincidentally, a few weeks before the exercise a local Boy Scout leader approached me in church & told me of an Eagle Scout project his boys had been working on…cleaning up a Russian POW gravesite behind the post gym. 6/
You see, during the war the Germans had a stalag at this post that housed mostly Russian and Polish soldiers they had captured. What I didn’t know was about 150 had died in captivity, and they were all buried there behind our gym 7/
Since the project was about complete, I thought it might be great to show the Russian delegation what the Scouts had done. We arranged for the young boys to be there for the RU general’s visit so he could shake their hand. 8/
The day came, I escorted the Russians to the site, told them the story, introduced him to the young scouts…and they said nothing. He looked around w/ a scowl, turned to me & said “if these had been real Russian soldiers, they would not have surrendered to the Germans” 9/
Then he said “they were probably from one of the inferior countries that want to call themselves real Russians.”10/
He said nothing to the boys, turned around and headed to the car. Now, I know I was a 1-star, and he was a 3-star, but that day at the close of the exercises I saluted all the other country’s official visitors, but I did not give him a proper military honor of a hand salute. 11/
I returned to Graf in 2014 after I retired for a conference, and I did my morning run past that graveyard just to see it. It was still being maintained by the scouts, and those Russian dead were still being honored, though not by fellow Russians. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was a major during Desert Storm. Other armies have attempted to model our actions during that 45 day air campaign & 4 day/100 hour ground campaign.
But they don’t understand the things we applied during that fight. 1/8
The US/alliance had brilliant political leadership in Bush & Powell. There was operational competence in the generals. There was a masterful plan that relied on coordinated intel, logistics & the principles of war. 2/8
Perhaps most importantly, there was a new generation of professional & trained military personnel, with great equipment, sound doctrine, realistic training & terrific leadership development. (A new school for planners -SAMS- also played a huge part). 3/8
After one of my @CNN appearances, one of the anchors asked me off-air why I had confidence in Ukraine's army to push back agains the illegal Russian military onslaught.
I used a bit of "battlefield math" to explain my rationale. 1/16
Their are two major factors most military folks consider to determine combat power: the force's resources and the force's will.
There are more elements under each of these categories that contribute to military capabilities. 2/
The force's RESOURCES: that's quantity (size of the force, Number of different capabilities...like air, artillery, # of soldiers), quality of equipment, extent and specificity of their training, their logistics & ability to resupply, their intelligence, etc. 3/
It appears the city of Kharkiv may be an objective of Putin and the Russian Army. My Ukrainian counterpart - Col-Gen Vorobyof - took me on a tour of that city (his hometown) in 2011. My impressions: 1/8
First, it is a beautiful city, and relatively modern. The city had suffered through 4 different battles during WWII, so it was mostly rebuilt. But many buildings had beautiful architecture. 2/
The citizens were very welcoming to me, as an American (likely because of my host’s influence & my Army rank at the time). It was my first taste of samovar tea, but we also had excellent Kharkiv vodka. 3/
Earlier, I commented about a reporter in @PentagonPresSec briefing asking whether @82ndABNDiv would parachute into Poland.
Since then, lots (LOTs) of paratroopers commented on in-flight rigging, how it would send a message, how it's been done on exercises etc. 1/7
From a theater commander's perspective, here are the pros and cons:
Pros: 1. Yes, you can do in-flight rigging (but it's difficult and takes excessive space). 2. Yes, it would send a message (but not a good one, given we are not trying to be excessively provocative). 2/7
3. Yes, the 82d has parachuted into Poland (and Germany, and several other countries in Europe) before (but almost all were in the summer, as part of an exercise, and with other nations). 4. Yes, I'm a tanker & therefore a "leg" (but I know a bit about airborne ops in EU). 3/7
I had the pleasure of engaging a group of Professional MBA students this weekend in a"Strategic Leadership" class
As an adjunct, these classes are fun, especially since we discuss application of knowledge in the real world 1/12
Last semester, these students received an introduction to "leadership theories."
For info, there are literally *dozens* of theories on leadership, but we wanted groups of students to do a deeper dive on 4 different theories, their meaning & potential application. 2/
The theories the 4 groups analyzed were: 1. Leader-Member Exchange (or LMX) theory 2. Servant Leadership Theory (which most wanted to analyze, because they felt they were "servant leaders") 3. Transactional Leadership Theory, and 4. Transformational Leadership Theory 3/
Some facts to put this article in perspective:
1.Pentagon always does “planning” for civilian evacuations in a war-torn country. Plus, there are contingency plans already on the shelf that are adapted. 1/
2. There are always “courses of action” & a “number of different scenarios” based on the situation & thoughts on how to conduct the NEO (non-combatant evacuation operations) Having planned and conducted these, the course of action usually changes, sometimes more than once. 2/
3. While the Pentagon plans, the State Dept is always the lead for these actions. They make the call on when to execute and how many citizens to remove. State never has an accurate count of US citizens in any particular country. 3/