OK - now #GhislaineMaxwell rogue juror Scotty David is set to be questioned by Judge Nathan @SDNYLIVE. Last night US Attorney applied to give Scott immunity- story innercitypress.com/sdnytrial76max… book amazon.com/dp/B09P7RNGK6 Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
Scotty David is set to sit in the jury box, with a long boom mic stretching toward him. Buthe is not in the box as of 10:10 am. Even if Judge Nathan grants US Attorney immunity request, it would only kick in if Scotty Davis, as Spodek says he will, invokes the 5th
OK - at 10:21 am, Scotty David and Todd Spodek roll into the jury box. Scotty is in a sweater with a stripe across it; Spodek in a suit, quite different than the actor who plays him in Investing Anna. All rise!
AUSA: Maurene Comey, Ms. Moe.
Judge Nathan: Mr. Spodek, on behalf of Juror 50. We're here today on defendant's motion for a new trial. I have received proposed questions for both sides. The defense wants to do its own questioning. I deny that application.
Judge Nathan: Does he wish to be referred to Juror 50, Mr. Spodek?
Spodek: He does.
Judge Nathan: Is he invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination?
Spodek: Yes, Judge.
Scotty David: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge Nathan: In accord with the application, I have signed the proposed immunity order. It's use immunity. And you need to answer my question truthfully today. You will not be prosecuted even if you have committed a crime
[Now Scotty David is in the plastic witness box.]
Judge Nathan: I'll not ask you about jury deliberations or your thought process. There's a binder in front of you, Juror 50. Court Exhibit 1 is a copy of the questionnaire you filled out on November 4, 2021.
Judge Nathan: Do you recognize it?
Juror 50: Yes, Your Honor.
Judge Nathan: Look at Question 48, about sexual assault... You indicated "No." Is that accurate?
Juror 50: No, it is not.
Judge Nathan: What is an accurate answer?
Juror 50. Yes. For self.
Juror 50: I was abused as a child.
Judge Nathan: What happened?
Juror 50: It was a family member, who is no longer part of the family, and one of their friends, when I was 9 and 10 years old.
Judge Nathan: Multiple occasions?
Juror 50: Multiple.
Judge Nathan: Did you tell anyone?
Juror 50: No. Not until I was in high school. My mom then called the police station. But I don't know if anything was filed. There were no charges brought.
Juror 50: It was a step-brother.
Judge Nathan: Look at Question 48(b)... Would it impact your ability to be fair. What is an accurate answer?
Juror 50: It did not impact my ability to be fair and impartial at all.
Judge Nathan: Question 25 reads, victim of a crime. Was your "no" accurate?
Juror 50: Now that I think about it, not accurate. I was thinking about mugging. I no longer associate my sexual abuse with being a victim. I don't know anyone who's ever been robbed
Judge Nathan: Question 49, you or any family member accused of sexual harassment? You checked no.
Juror 50: That's accurate.
Judge Nathan: But you accused your step-brother.
Juror 50: I don't consider him a family member. I flew through the questionnaire.
Juror 50: I never thought I'd get selected for this jury. I had to get here early and wait a long time to get into the courthouse... I was super distracted. I was sat four feet from the table where people dropped in their questionnaires. I just checked OK, OK
Judge Nathan: Now you acknowledge that a step-brother is a relative?
Juror 50: Yes, by law he was a family member. I see that now.
Judge Nathan: Did you hope to be on the jury?
Juror 50: If you gonna serve jury duty, it might as well be interesting.
Judge Nathan: You acknowledge it was inaccurate - why did you do it?
Juror 50: I didn't see the word "Self." They had audio - visual problems. I didn't have a phone or a book. I was thinking about a break-up from a few weeks prior.
Juror 50: I thought it was asking about family, or a friend. The box that says yes for Self, I just missed it. This is one of the biggest mistakes I've ever made in my life.
Judge Nathan: Did you see the other questions with the Self box?
Juror 50: Only now.
Judge Nathan: When you did find out about this problem?
Juror 50: In an article about my interview... with the Daily Mail.
Judge Nathan: Was it intentional?
Juror 50: Absolutely not.
Judge: Were you thinking you'd personally benefit by being on the jury?
A: No
Juror 50: I'm the person I am today due to my goals and ambitions. But I should have marked Yes for Self.
Judge Nathan: When did you learn what case it was?
Juror 50: After three hours.
Judge Nathan: How long did it take to fill out?
Juror 50: Great question.
Juror 50: I don't know.
Judge Nathan: Why did you rush?
Juror 50: It's like in school, you want to finish and hang out with your friends.
Judge Nathan: Were you concerned with following my instructions?
Juror 50: Absolutely 50. I didn't think I'd be chosen.
Judge Nathan: Your questionnaire seems to follow the instructions throughout. How do you reconcile that with your testimony?
Juror 50: Where it says "If Yes," I just flew threw, since I'd checked No. I was in the zone.
Judge Nathan: You said my question was a good question. How long was it?
Juror 50: I didn't see a clock. It felt like hours before we saw your video.
Judge Nathan: So, an hour to fill out the questionnaire?
Juror 50: I think that would be accurate.
Juror 50: I don't tell many people about my sexual abuse.
Judge Nathan: You did tell people in interviews.
Juror 50: This is going back to a deliberation thing... I only used my sexual abuse to talk to a reporter about jury deliberations.
Judge Nathan: You knew the public was interested in this case.
Juror 50: I didn't know this would happen. If I had lied deliberately I wouldn't have told anyone about it.... I said I could remember things like the color of the wall.
Judge Nathan: Your friends were following the news of the case after you indicated you were on this jury?
Juror 50: Most people don't even know. I don't want to watch about sexual abuse. I saw the victims on the stand and I said, I can do that too
Judge Nathan: So on Nov 16 I asked you directly if you'd answered the questions accurate and if you could be fair.
Juror 50: I based myself solely on the evidence.
Judge Nathan: I will meet with counsel at sidebar.
[In the witness box, Scotty David swigs water]
11:24 am - Judge Nathan is back from whispered sidebar.
Judge Nathan: I asked if you took my instructions carefully and your answer is NO?
Juror 50: I did not.
Judge Nathan: Why?
Juror 50: I began to float, I began to fly, I don't know what happened.
Judge Nathan: My oral questions, did you listen carefully?
Juror 50: I answered those carefully.
Judge Nathan: Why was it different?
Juror 50: It was weeks later. I wasn't thinking about my ex.
Judge Nathan: What about my instructions at various points?
Juror 50: It was to follow them.
Judge Nathan: Why did you think your family and friends wouldn't know, when you did interviews?
Juror 50: I wasn't using my full name. And I am not ashamed. It's common
Juror 50: When my friends commented on my post, texted me about it, they didn't even know this trial was happening. So I didn't think it would be in the news. I wasn't planning to hide. If I was asked if I was abused I would say Yes.
Judge Nathan: You posted on social media --
Juror 50: After the trial.
Judge Nathan: You thanked Annie Farmer.
Juror 50: For forwarding the articles. I have like two followers. I just randomly saw it.
[Inner City Press: Judge Nathan should ask Scotty David about his "thisBearTravels" Instagram account innercitypress.com/literary37maxi…]
Jury 50: I thought, this trial might be interesting and keep my attention.
Judge Nathan: How did you feel?
Juror 50: I was like, Did I just mess something up?
Judge Nathan: Did you speak about the consequences with any of the reporters you spoke to?
Juror 50: No.
Judge Nathan: I'll briefing speak with counsel.
[Another sidebar]
Judge Nathan: And you heard my summary of the case, including Jeffrey Epstein --
Juror 50: I did.
Judge Nathan: Counsel?
Assistant US Attorney: Let me find a date... Letter briefing by Friday?
Maxwell's counsel: I am starting a trial. So 2 weeks.
Judge Nathan: No, one week. 15 pages maximum. Your submitted questions have Juror 50's identifying information that must be redacted. The rest, docket it. Or, we'll handle it. The briefing, submit with redactions.
Judge Nathan: We're adjourned.
Soon stories on InnerCityPress.com and patreon.com/MatthewRussell…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inner City Press

Inner City Press Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @innercitypress

Mar 9
Programming note: For those interested in the sex cult trial of Larry Ray - and who wouldn't be? - jury selection's been slow but Judge Liman just sent them to lunch. Inner City Press has been covering the case and will be live tweeting as much as it can, later Image
Update: it's 3:10 pm and Judge Liman takes the bench to say, There are new jurors in the room.
He asked them if any Yes answers to the questions.
Those who say yes, he tells "I will see you at the sidebar."
This could take a while.
Update: it's 3:50 and Judge Liman re-takes the bench to say that the following [prospective] jurors are excused: 2, 20, 61, 64, 65 and 71. And 73-100 won't be needed - they're to go out into the hall and get further instructions [to go wait in another case]
Read 4 tweets
Mar 9
OK - now Flint water jury trial in Eastern District of Michigan court, before Judge Judith E. Levy. The Final Report is up on the exhibit screen for the jury. Inner City Press is following the case and may live tweet some, thread below Image
Judge Levy: The witness can only speak to his knowledge, not others'.
Counsel: I'll lay a foundation. Do you have personal knowledge as to whether they were evaluating corrosion control?
Witness: Looking for correct PH and balance.
Counsel: So they were discussing using Flint River water? Or is that comparing apples to oranges?
Objection as to form! I don't know what the oranges are.
Counsel: Did it relate to the Flint River or Lake Huron?
Witness: They do no compare: apples to oranges.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 8
Now as no call-in line Jan 6 trial of Guy Reffitt ends, now a detention hearing - by phone - on Matthew Beddingfield. His lawyer says, "He didn't mention Trump, he didn't wear a MAGA hat." Judge Faruqui drilling down. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
Judge Faruqui: So Mr. Beddingfield was 20, he's 21 now. But he has a prior record, and was on social media saying things that were very troubling. I don't want to get into the First Amendment issue, using what he says doesn't chill, he already said it
Judge Faruqui is moving toward releasing Beddingfield to the custody of his grandfather, who has no cell phone.
Judge Faruqui: I like that. We'd have a lot less trouble these days if there were more people like you.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7
OK - now staffers the Federal Reserve Bank of NY wants to fire for being unvaccinated are before SDNY Judge Liman as they were Friday. inner City Press covered that innercitypress.com/sdny1frbnytroi… and will live tweet, thread below ImageImage
FRBNY lawyer: Now plaintiffs over the weekend make a a Constitution argument. But the New York Fed is not a government agency.
[Inner City Press: Then how does NY Fed approve bank mergers? See, FRBNY Approves Berkshire Bank With NTI Rating innercitypress.com/cra1litmustest…
Judge Liman: Even if discrimination were being alleged, would an injunctions be issues?
NY Fed staffer's new/1st lawyer: The very pressure put on these plaintiffs to abandoned their bona fide religious beliefs is irreparable harm, per se
Read 12 tweets
Feb 10
Crypto in the court: In US v. Lichtenstein & Morgan, now in DDC Court DOJ puts in a chart of #Bitfinex hack laundering they allege - including through #Uber, #WalMart, Hotels [dot] com and #PlayStation. Inner City Press remains on the case innercitypress.com/crypto3liechte…
Among Ilya Lichtenstein's Passport_Ideas files, this: "real russian passport from Lugansk. Must pick up in person." Also, "eu doc fakes."
More from the DOJ filing in DDC: "Morgan posted photos to social media during her trip indicating
that she was staying at a Hilton hotel near the 11 Mirrors Design Hotel. Document titled “ukraine_package,” explains “how to anonymously receive a parcel in Ukraine”
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
OK - now in Sarah Palin v. NYT trial, Palin herself on the witness stand @SDNYLIVE Inner City Press is covering the trial innercitypress.com/sdnytrial1pali…
and will live tweet, thread below
Palin: I was defending Bernie Sanders because there would be some who would try to link him to the shooting [at the baseball practice]. I did not want to see more untruths printed, trying to score political points by capitalizing on horrific violence.
Palin: The NYT had already run a kneejerk piece, trying to score political points.
Palin's lawyer: What were people calling to tell you?
NYT lawyer: Objection!
Judge Rakoff: Not for the truth, but for impact on her?
Palin's lawyer: Yes.
Judge Rakoff: Overruled.
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(