Ali Vaez Profile picture
Mar 11 9 tweets 2 min read
What's happening in #ViennaTalks? A state of play, best as I can tell [Thread]
2/ Last week, the main - but not sole - area of disagreement was over Iran's @IAEAOrg safeguards probe. U.S./E3 as well as the agency were clear that closing it was a non-starter.

DG Grossi went to Tehran on Saturday, secured an roadmap to address this.

One step forward.
3/ But the same day, right after 🇮🇱 PM’s visit, Russia's FM threw a wrench into the mix:

Facing what he described as an "avalanche of aggressive sanctions" against 🇷🇺 over 🇺🇦 Lavrov called for guarantees that these would not "in any way damage our right to free and full trade".
4/ Not clear if the Iranians had any clue this was coming. U.S. quickly and repeatedly underscored that any sanctions relief on Iran is not a carte blanche for other potentially sanctioned entities (ie, Russian) to be immunized. French called it "blackmail".
5/ Now, for the Russians, there's a non-proliferation interest in seeing the JCPOA revived. But there's a countering interest in freeing a rival oil exporter and taking one item off the West's immediate to-do list. 

Seems clear the balance has tipped toward the latter.
6/ So, you ask, can't the Russians just be bypassed? Why the complication? Well, two things:

A. Russia is a member of the JCPOA's Joint Commission, which makes decisions by consensus. If they're opposed to the adoption of a re-entry framework, could try to block it.
7/ B. The Russians have a practical role as well, in terms of civil cooperation projects as well as potentially receiving Iran's enriched uranium stockpile beyond JCPOA's 300kg cap. Similar to what was done in 2015 👇

nyti.ms/3I3Rj0F
8/ At this stage, neither adamancy of Russian demands nor exact scope seems clear. If it necessitates workarounds on nuke side, there might be some options.

But now we know exactly why the negotiating mantra all along has been: 

Nothing is agreed till everything is agreed.
9/9 Not able to defy one of the sole countries it can rely on, Iran has gone as far as blaming the US for the current deadlock. Let’s hope that behind the scenes they and others are trying to find solutions to avoid yet another crisis in these troubled times.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ali Vaez

Ali Vaez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AliVaez

Mar 10
Why should we listen to policy makers who have been consistently wrong? These Democrats supported Trump's withdrawal and are responsible for allowing Iran to advance to the verge of nuclear weapons. jewishinsider.com/2022/03/eleven…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 9
This afternoon, Senators @SenatorRisch, @tedcruz and @SenJohnBarrasso are leading a @SenateGOP press conference on the Iran nuclear deal.

You'd be hard-pressed to find three people who've been as wrong over as long a period on how to address Iran's nuclear program. [Thread] Image
2| Here's @SenatorRisch talking to @NPR in 2017, prior to Trump's withdrawal. He laments the deal's sunsets (not 10 years, BTW), and says the solution is... sanctions. Well, we know how that worked out - no nuclear restrictions at all! Image
3| Here's @SenJohnBarrasso on @FoxNews in 2019, lauding the decision to withdraw because "it didn't step them from getting the path to the weapon".

Yet here we are, with Iran enriching near-weapons grade, under limited monitoring, weeks from breakout capability. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 17
🧵گروه بحران: ششمین گزارش از وضعیت اجرای برجام بر اساس نزدیک به ۵۰ مصاحبه با مقامات کشورهای عضو برجام، آمریکا، منطقه و سازمان ملل. «مهلت نهایی» [ترجمه فارسی] @CrisisGroup

crisisgroup.org/fa/middle-east…
۲/ایران و آمریکا چند ماه است که به صورت غیرمستقیم بر سر احیای برجام در حال مذاکره‌اند اما موفق نشده‌اند راهکاری برای بازگشت مشترک پیدا کنند. جای تعجب ندارد که هر یک تقصیر را به گردن دیگری می‌اندازد. تروئیکای اروپایی و آمریکا در یک جبهه و روسیه و چین تا حدودی با ایران هم موضع‌اند.
۳/ ما تنش‌زایی هسته‌ای ایران در سال گذشته را مرور کردیم. از نظر کمی و کیفی، مثل غنی‌سازی ۶۰٪ بعد از حمله به نطنز، پیشرفت‌ها تصاعدی بوده. اگرچه هنوز اثری از ساخت سلاح هسته‌ای نیست، اما زمان گریز – دستیابی به میزان کافی اورانیوم برای ساخت یک بمب اتمی – به سه هفته رسیده است.
Read 21 tweets
Jan 17
🧵 New from @CrisisGroup: Our 6th - perhaps final - report on the status of the 2015 nuclear deal, based on more than 50 interviews conducted with officials from JCPOA parties, the U.S., UN and regional governments over the past several months 👇crisisgroup.org/middle-east-no…
2| U.S. & Iran have engaged in months of indirect talks aimed at restoring JCPOA. These have failed to deliver a framework for mutual compliance. Unsurprisingly, each sees the other at fault. E3 aligned w/ U.S.; Russia & China not unsympathetic to Iran but within limits.
3| We review Iran's nuclear escalation over past year, during which it made quantitative and qualitative leaps, inc raising enrichment to 60% - highest ever - after April attack at Natanz. Though still no evidence of weaponization, breakout time now a matter of weeks.
Read 22 tweets
Dec 16, 2021
بیش از یک دهه است که بر بحران هسته ای ایران تمرکز کرده ام. در این سالها انواع اتهامات به من زده شده: از داماد زاهدی گرفته تا کارمند سیا، از لابی ج.ا. و مشاور ظریف گرفته تا هزاردستان و کارمند سوروس. هرگز اهمیتی به این حرفها و هجمه ها نداده و نمی دهم. اصل مواضع فرد است 1/
مهمترین مواضع من و گروه بحران در سالهای اخیر به این شرح بوده است:
- مخالفت با اقدام ترامپ در تضعیف برجام حتی پیش از خروج آمریکا
2/
- مخالفت با فشار حداکثری و یکی از رساترین صداها در مخالفت با تحریم ها و لابی های مربوطه
3/
Read 10 tweets
Dec 16, 2021
The effort to rewrite history is really quite something.

Let's start with this: If Trump hadn't left JCPOA, we wouldn't be discussing nuclear expansion in the first place.

But instead of acknowledging that for the mistake it is, facts are spun in the service of narrative. 1/
2/ Note the phrase "since the election" - a neat dodge over the fact that increase to 20%, uranium metal production, & limits on IAEA inspections all put in motion in Dec 2020, after assassination of Fakhrizadeh.

Yet this key fact is curiously omitted in the FDD history.
3/ And again in April 2021, we see the escalation of enrichment from 20% to 60%, somehow failing to mention the explosion at Natanz barely 48 earlier.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(