The Ukrainian Armed Forces are making some remarkable claims today about losses in the air war for the Russians yesterday. They claim 10 Russian aircraft down, 4 by SAMs, 4 by air to air, 2 by short range air defense. facebook.com/kpszsu/videos/…
At the same time they are claiming to have destroyed an entire regiment of Russian airborne forces, with all their equipment including tanks. (I dont speak Ukrainian but have received this summary from the trustworthy @TrentTelenko
These are extraordinary claims and as its war we have to take them with a grain of salt. However if they are even half correct two things seem to be happening.
1) the Russians are not just not winning the air war, they are losing it.
2) Some of the supposedly best troops in the Russian Army are being caught out.
We need to await validation, but these are actually unsustainable losses. The air losses would lead to the Russian Air Force having to avoid any dangerous missions, and the ground losses show an inability to mount advanced operations.
These claims validate 2 things we saw yesterday. The first is that they are speaking with great confidence about how the war is developing, with even a little disdain for the Russians (that is not a great sign by the way--overconfidence in war never good).
and that the Ukrainian General Staff has very little fear of Russian abilities to react in war (also a little overconfident for my tastes) such as when they openly admitted to by moving behind Russian lines.
btw, if anyone else knows Ukrainian and wants to comment on that video, please do.
Also, building on the claims by the Ukrainian military of such high Russian aircraft losses, there actually should be a straightforward way to see if they are at all accurate. Can the Russians maintain air operations at anything like the level of the last week.
If they were really damaged as claimed, they would for reasons of dwindling resources and pilot morale, have to cut back operations and change tactics to ‘safer’ methods of operations.
Think of what happened to the Luftwaffe in September 1940 or the US 8th AF in October 1943. In both cases when losses became unsustainable, they made significant changes.
The Germans switched to safer (for them) nighttime bombing, which was also mostly useless. The US refused to fly deep over Germany until they had proper escorts.
If the Russians don’t change something, then their losses are probably not as high as claimed. So their operational tempo over the next few days is worth watching.
Don’t really know what to make of this claim, certainly shows the Ukrainians are continuing to make rather extraordinary claims. Basically saying they have neutered almost 30% of the Russian Army’s mobile offensive power.
Find that very hard to believe. If so, this Russian Army is in serious trouble.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Mar 13
Defintely worth a read. A view from within China on the Russia-Ukraine war and China. Overall a pessimistic reading on what Putin’s invasion means.
Here is the full translation: uscnpm.org/2022/03/12/hu-…
Just one excerpt that stands out (and there are many others in the piece). The view that Russia can’t fight a protracted war (in other words China will not be bailing Putin out as the Russian economy collapses). Coming from a senior voice in China, it’s revealing. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12
Logistics Rule--look at the map. You might be wondering why the Russian invasion of Ukraine looks like a group of almost equidistant road-linked thrusts stretching from Russian and Belarus into Ukraine. (thanks to @Nrg8000 for this) Image
Turning to this War on the Rocks piece, it is said that the average Russian unit has a truck lift to take it to 90 miles (140km) from the closest large supply dump (see below). You would have to double the trucks on hand to get to 180 miles. warontherocks.com/2021/11/feedin… Image
Here is the map with a 140km/90mile line (handdrawn, apologies) in black in the middle. What you can see is that there have hardly been any Russian thrusts that have exceeded the natural limit set by their truck lift. Image
Read 17 tweets
Mar 12
I wonder if these two tweets are related. Biden saying that the USA will not directly fight for Ukraine while ramping up deliveries of more effective systems. We are watching the formation of new red-lines throughout this conflict.
The uncrossable ones are no ground-forces in Ukraine or aircraft in the skies--no direct exchange of fire. What the US has done, however, is constantly test the red-line of what military systems they can deliver to the Ukrainians.
Otoh, the Russians are trying to push red lines in the other direction. This is quite an audacious claim. THough I dont think they would dare do it, as it would also involve a potential direct exchange with NATO.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
Already worth noting that the importance of logistics is being taken as the number one lesson of this war so far.
From the article. Image
If Pentagon war games had Ukraine being conquered in 3-4 days, they were even more mistaken than Putin. This needs some serious introspection.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
There has been an change in the discussion of a possible Russian success (victory doesnt seem to be used so much these days) in the war against Ukraine, saying that because the Russian Army is still advancing in places, the situation is better for them.
Indeed that article talks about using some battlefield victories (taking of Kyiv) as a means of leveraging greater concessions from Ukraine in negotiations.
This is an entirely different concept of victory than that which was talked about earlier a complete abandonment of maximalist aims.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 11
An important understanding of why time is on Ukraine’s side unless Putin basically commits an entirely fresh army, which would have to start moving very soon.
If this estimate is right, the Russians have already lost 20000 to 24000 killed and wounded. This is without making many attempts to get into Ukrainian cities (which would be very bloody operations)
In the meantime, the Ukrainians have resupplies with massive amounts of the right weaponry to cause massive more casualties if the Russians do move into cities (or indeed move almost anywhere in the open)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(