Quick 🧵 on Russia's sabotage of the #IranTalks in Vienna.
Though the JCPOA has not been killed by the Russian demands, Moscow does have the ability to harm the US by delaying the agreement at a crucial point of US vulnerability to high oil prices. >>
2. Russia can possibly also pull the plug on the agreement as a whole by triggering snap-back sanctions in the UN Security Council or preventing the Joint Commission to adopt the decision to bring the US back into the deal. >>
3. In retrospect, the parties were clearly mistaken in thinking that Russia would continue to compartmentalize the JCPOA talks from its tensions with the West. It remains unclear however if the Russian objective is to delay the deal or to scuttle the deal.
>>
4. Though Tehran has been tempered in its statements, it must clearly be angered. But Iran is stuck between two bad choices: Accepting the potential collapse of the JCPOA and continued sanctions, or seeking a potential agreement with the US outside of the JCPOA...>>
5. ...which could dangerously increase tensions between Tehran and Moscow while making Iran dependent on the US at a time when GOP officials have made it clear they will kill the JCPOA if they take the White House in 2024. >>
6. Hopefully, JCPOA can still be salvaged. But if it dies, it further shows the folly of Biden not going back to the deal via Executive Order on day one. No one could have predicted the Russian war, but many predicted that it would be unpredictably messy to negotiate a return.//
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵
The audacity of Saudi and UAE to publicly HUMILIATE America this way is stunning!
If you ever wanted evidence that the US's relationship with Saudi & UAE is designed to serve THEM and not the US, this is it. #UkraineRussianWar
>> wsj.com/articles/saudi…
2. After all the (erroneous) support the US has given Saudi as it bombs Yemen to pieces, KSA & UAE still refuse to stand with the US on Russia.
They do so because they CAN. Because there's never been a cost for them to undermine the US. >>
3. It is important to understand that this is NOT their fault.
This is OUR fault.
We allowed this relationship to become this one-sided.
And instead of being tough on Saudi, as Biden promised he would, he has shifted towards appeasement in the last few months. >>
2. It means that any carrots the US puts forward in the talks are devalued precisely because we are explicit about their lack of durability.
So the US has to offer more to achieve the same because of this lack of trustworthiness.
>>
3. As I have written elsewhere, this has been a major challenge in the nuclear talks. Being unreliable does not put you in a good position to ask for a "longer and stronger" deal... >>
2. It is quite stunning to see how the WSJ in its reporting - let alone its opinion section - pushes for American global military domination by creating a narrative that other countries are expansionist.
Consider the numbers.>>
3. US has more than 750 (!) military bases worldwide. China has 2.
Yet, according to the WSJ, it is China that pursues an aggressive "expansionist" policy by seeking a base (unclear whether it is military) in West Africa - which WSJ goes on the declare America's "home turf.">>
Biden should bring home ALL US troops in Iraq, @AdamNoahWho and I argue in the @nytopinion today. They don't serve a purpose - they don't deter Iran nor are they needed to fight ISIS.
M. Biden should announce a phased troop withdrawal asap.
If he doesn’t, attacks on U.S. troops will inevitably increase and increase the risk of the United States getting dragged into a larger conflict in the Middle East. And for what? >>
The US does not have the answer for Iraq’s woes. It cant allay the frustration of Iraqis over an unresponsive government and political violence; it is ill-equipped to mediate between Iraq’s competing factions or untangle the web of crisscrossing interests that stymies progress.>>
🧵Wow! A very telling interview with head of Israel's Iran directorate from April. It gives important clues as to why, 6 mo's later, the nuclear talks are stuck...
He says Biden listens to the Bibi gov, evidenced by the US "NOT RUSHING TO A NEW DEAL"
2. This is important as Biden wasted several weeks before starting #IranDeal talks. Those weeks were partly spent on consulting w/ Israel, which apparently advised Biden not to "rush to a deal." Biden obliged by wasting time.
Today, Biden says "time is running out" for talks >>
3. Once again, the US chose to listen to the advice of a state and its leader (Netanyahu) who clearly had shown their preference for diplomacy to fail. (This doesn't take any blame away from the Raisi gov's conduct, but Biden had a major opportunity with Rouhani that he blew) >>
🧵
Important piece on US-Israeli tensions re Iran talks. It fails to point out a key conclusion tho: Biden’s immense efforts to appease Israel in hope of tempering its opposition to the JCPOA has not only failed but was likely a mistake from the outset >>
2. Diverging Israeli and American views on the JCPOA is nothing new - on the contrary. But senior officials in the Biden team thought Obama could have handled the Israelis better through closer coordination and by taking some of their hawkish advice. >>
3. The fundamental question was: Are Israel and America’s views on a negotiated settlement with Iran irreconcilable, or is there a way to clinch a lasting deal with Iran that also makes Israel happy? >>