Just Ran: US says Russia should back down on written guarantees sanctions demand in #IranTalks or they'll seek alternative agreement with Iran, excluding Moscow. wsj.com/articles/u-s-w… -1-
A senior State Department official said if #Russia presses its guarantee demands or doesn’t reply “in the coming week,” Washington would need to “very quickly consider an alternative path.” -2-
U.S. official says would need to quickly explore an alternative deal if Russia won't back down, given pressing time constraints. Too early to say if that would be interim deal or a JCPOA replica. At this point, "wouldn’t rule anything out.” -3-
Senior State Department Official says that beyond the narrow carve-outs for Russian nuclear-related tasks under JCPOA, which Moscow had originally demanded, it won't negotiate broader Ukraine-sanctions exemptions with #Russia. -4-
“I don’t see the scope for going beyond what is within the confines of the JCPOA,” the official said. ”I think it’s pretty safe to say that there is no room for making exemptions beyond those.” -5-
Senior U.S. official says there are "only a handful of issues left principally between Iran and the United States and chiefly about the scope of sanctions relief." Says Russia's demands "most serious stumbling block" preventing deal. -6-
“These are not new issues. these were old issues that of course we have not yet been able to resolve. But that we felt were – whose resolution we felt was within reach. No guarantee but we felt we were making progress.” -7-
U.S. official says Washington's preference remains to return to JCPOA if Russia backs away from its broader demands. Narrow nuclear-related guarantees allowing Russia to do what needed under JCPOA, manageable. wsj.com/articles/u-s-w… -8-
One footnote and point. Conversation quoted here was shortly before last night's Erbil attack took place though I have no reason to believe it affects the approach. Also, a new deal, even if a replica will certainly trigger INARA though I think that would have happened anyway.-9-

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with laurence norman

laurence norman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @laurnorman

Mar 9
Understand from two sources that Russia @Amb_Ulyanov presented updated non paper yesterday to EU which broadened Moscow’s sanctions guarantee demands in direction that Lavrov spoke of on Saturday. That includes a demand to protect Russian trade with Iran from western sanctions-1-
The paper was not well received. “The paper was rejected out of hand,” said a senior diplomat. “They know it has nothing to do with JCPOA.” -2-
So where does this stand? Sources say a deal could be reached with this issue still hanging over the talks. Could this Russian position mean restoring JCPOA without Russian backing? That gets tricky, former and current officials say. Joint Commission decisions supposed to be -3-
Read 5 tweets
Mar 7
Our latest as @Bagheri_Kani heads home unexpectedly, promising a swift return, Russia doubles down on sanctions guarantee demands and Vienna negotiations wind to a standstill. wsj.com/articles/iran-… -1-
“It is time, in the next few days, for political decisions to end the ViennaTalks,” Enrique Mora, the European Union official who chairs the talks, said on Twitter. -2-
“If the final decisions are not taken in Washington and Tehran now, this agreement is in serious jeopardy,” said a senior Western diplomat on Monday. “By delaying these decisions, a window has been opened for Moscow to wreak havoc.” -3-
Read 4 tweets
Mar 6
My understanding now of any #IranTalks deal that emerges is several phases of implementation. There will 1/ be a “confirmation” period. That could mean for Majlis and INARA? Not quite clear. Then 2/ A preparation period. (IAEA get material to review?) 3/ we then get... 1/2
Re-implementation day. And then 4/ we get some period for final steps by Iran on nuclear side as I understand it. Total period a few months and aim to do by summer. BUT I understand discussions remain on precise sequencing steps and length. -2-
All this raises a few questions. When would “verification” be? How many steps to return to compliance will Iran/US have taken by June when we find out if IAEA is shutting or keeping open the safeguards probe? When does IAEA get docs and material from Iran? Do US hold off final-3-
Read 4 tweets
Mar 3
#IranTalks: Let's not underestimate significance of @rafaelmgrossi Tehran trip. Let's assume it succeeds, which is definitely an assumption. But if so, it removes probably the toughest of the three remaining issues on the table. Then we can imagine a quick pathway to deal.
-1-
At that point, we have 2 issues essentially. Economic guarantee push from Iran & sanctions scope push. Econ guarantees was worked on for weeks. Iran knows not going to get much more than pretty words. Maybe it gets a few more pretty words. But won't change US legal reality -2-
On the other hand, we know Iran wants unconditional FTO removal from IRGC & I suspect a few other key demands on sanctions. There's a potential (STRESS POTENTIAL) trade-off here. Back off on economic guarantees, US gives a bit more on sanctions. -3-
Read 6 tweets
Mar 2
Managed to check in with several sources tonight. This is where I think we stand on #IranTalks and some key points...
1 -- Diplos genuinely don't know which way this is going, Most still think this could come together but confidence levels on this are low. The differences that were there on Monday when Bagheri-Kani returned are still there -- safeguards, sanctions scope, economic guarantees.
2 -- Ukraine/Russia has landed in talks in several ways. A: Russia team more tentative about clearing ideas without checking. B, it hardens the idea that diplomatic window to land this deal is short. C/ Optics of sitting down with Russia on this getting more complicated in DC.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 2
IAEA @rafaelmgrossi - not ducking issue. “We are meeting today to discuss the nuclear safety, security and safeguards implications of the conflict in Ukraine as a result of the Russian Federation’s military operation that began on 24 February.”
“The situation in Ukraine is unprecedented and I continue to be gravely concerned. It is the first time a military conflict is happening amidst the facilities of a large, established nuclear power programme,” -2-
“I have called for restraint from all measures or actions that could jeopardize the security of nuclear and other radioactive material...because any such incident could have severe consequences, aggravating human suffering and causing environmental harm.” -3-
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(