These RU loss charts of equipment & personnel are questionable, but if they are even close to reality they are significant.

In 2007-9, I commanded the @1stArmoredDiv, 1 of 5 “heavy” divisions (10 total active divisions) in our Army.

Here’s how those losses would compare 1/8
The 5 US Army divisions that have tanks contain from 101 up to 303 tanks, because US division vary from 1 to 3 armored brigades.

That’s hard for civilians to understand, but each Division is organized for different missions. 2/
Current US Army divisions have from as few as 15,000 Soldiers (in a division of only two Armored Combat Arms Brigades) to well over 20,000+ Soldiers (in Divisions where there are four ACABs). 3/
A US aviation brigade (CAB) has a combination of attack/reconnaissance helicopters (AH-64 Apache), medium-lift helicopters (UH-60 Black Hawk), heavy-lift helicopters (CH-47 Chinook), aerial MEDEVAC & drones.

Great organizations, w/ “about” 100 aircraft total. 4/
These are three comparisons between US & RU organizations. If these UKR charts are close to accurate, one can see the significant loss of combat power & personnel RU has sustained in 20 days.

This is the lethality of conventional war, different than fighting an insurgency. 5/
Add UKR’ military equipment & personnel loss in their Army & territorial forces & the tragic death of 1000s of civilians due to RU’s scorched earth approach. The toll is devastating.

It’s on Putin. He is destroying his own military while causing horrific suffering in UKR. 6/
From a military & strategic perspective, RU has already lost.

As I said a week ago, RU offensive operations will soon culminate due to losses & lack of supplies. They will then go on the defense, with continued artillery destruction of towns. 7/
Any continuation of this campaign by Putin will only result in more loss and continues suffering…on both sides.

RU Army in UKR will go from being defeated to destroyed. Putin is a military & strategic moron who should be held accountable for war crimes. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Hertling

Mark Hertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

Mar 15
After the rumor that Russia was asking for Chinese equivalent of Meals, Ready to Eat (MEEs) @hawaiidelilah asked my opinion of the logistics indicators of the Russian force.

The military uses “classes of supply” to categorize things armies need. 1/6
Heres my evaluation, based on what I’ve seen, of Russia’s state of logistics, and where they are failing. (Note, I have no data on any of this, but it’s my gut feel). 2/
-Class I: food, rations and water:F
-Class III: Petroleum, fuel, lubricants: D
-Class IV: Fortification and barrier material: untested, likely F
-Class V: Ammunition: on artillery, missiles and rockets, declining; all others unknown, likely D. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Mar 13
This is a good map.

But let’s add some context:
-the circumference around Kyiv is 30 miles
-there’s a major river flowing through the city
-3 million people live w/in the city limits
-the 3 “arrows” (axis of advances) on left (30k RU troops) have been stalled for 96 hours
1/4
-the 1 arrow on right (about 15k troops) has been beat up in Sumy & Chernihiv
-all logistics columns have and continue to suffer significant losses
-an attack takes a 3:1 advantage; a siege takes much more. 2/4
-it’s very cold, RU troops are hungry & wet, have been in the field in UKR (enemy territory) for 17 days & in Belarus several months before that
-UKR is defending their capital…RU troops don’t know why they were there.
3/4
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12
I said it yesterday on @cnn, I'll say it again today.

Having worked w/ UKR's army, I expected them to be very good. And they have been better than I expected.

Having seen Russian forces in training & exercises, I expected them to be bad. They are worse than I expected. 1/10
But having said this, I've also learned a few things in my career:

1. Don't ever underestimate your enemy
2. The army that continues to adapt fastest usually wins.
3. You never know what the enemy "commander" (in this case, Putin) will do that may radically change things. 2/
While UKRs Army & Territorial forces are performing magnificently, they are on the horns of a dilemma:

Continue their resistance/continue with a very effective active defense OR siphon off manpower for massive humanitarian relief efforts (moving civilians, medical aid, etc). 3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 10
Lot of recent talk about Russian (and Ukrainian) casualties.

Reports vary, based on who provides them, and how they are counting the losses.

History shows that in war, those who are conducting the offense (Russia), casualties tend to be higher...in the defense, lower 1/18
But number of casualties are also affected by other things:
-the type of conflict (conventional vs insurgency)
-the method of war (infantry vs tanks/aircraft)
-the quality of medical support 2/
This war is different than what Americans are used to seeing in Iraq & Afghanistan, with patrols taking fire or vehicles hitting IEDs.

In an insurgency/counterinsurgency, casualties are mostly among infantry, engineers, support personnel...and there are fewer killed/injured. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Mar 5
Many seem to be stuck on instituting a US/NATO No Fly Zone (NFZ) in Ukraine. Some asking for this compare doing so to what happened in Iraq and the Balkans.

I don't think it's a good idea, for several reasons. So here's a quick thread. 1/11
The concept of a NFZ is such that a nation puts aircraft into a contested area to prevent another nation from using aircraft against an ally.

It seems simple: Put aircraft in the sky, and stop someone else from using their aircraft from doing bad things. 2/
There's a couple problems to this:
First, in order to ENFORCE a NFZ, you have to be prepared to shoot the other aircraft down. If you're not worried about doing that because you have the power that nothing else bad could happen, you're okay. 3/
Read 15 tweets
Mar 3
A thread on an experience I had in 2004 with a Russian General. 1/12
In returning from Iraq in 2004 as a one-star general, I was assigned as the commander of the US Army Training Center in Grafenwoehr, Germany. Beautiful place, and one of my favorite jobs during my career. 2/
This is a place where we conducted training and exercises with US forces, but my boss had given me the task to turn it into a multinational training center for our NATO allies and other partners. 3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(