Sounds right. One of the most sensible compromises (and I know some people don’t like the word) would be for Ukraine to forego NATO membership but be allowed into the EU.
Being in the EU would provide security in two ways. If Russia did ever threaten Ukraine again, it would be cut off even more completely economically than now.
And, the EU looks like it’s emerging from this war as a much more focussed strategic power with military aspirations. In 20 years or so who is to say that EU will be more important to Ukraine’s security than the USA led NATO.
Im not Ukrainian, and have no idea what the Ukrainian government feels after having been so brutally invaded. But I would take a deal of yes to EU membership and no to full NATO membership.
And remember back to 18 months ago, NATO’s very future was being called into question by American populism. That has not magically disappeared.
Certainly seems that option (the Austria model we might call it) is being seriously floated.
Interesting to note that I have never seen my Twitter feed so equally divided on a question (at least in the chat). Maybe a sign that it is a workable compromise?
Obviously even this deal would lead to very heated relationships over territory. These can be particularly nasty and divide societies. Look at the Irish Republican movement and the Free State fight in 1922
Important to keep in mind that most wars don’t end with one leader deep in a bunker blowing his brains out and the other marching through a captured capital. It usually involves some compromise; even between the bitterest of enemies.
And keep in mind that the Ukrainian government actually floated this as a trial balloon (seems the Ukrainian military blocked). This is not a case of some deal being imposed on Ukraine. So stop that silliness.
This is part of a long thread from US Defense official, it starts the section where the person discusses logistics. It has some of the better intelligence on the state of Russian logistics that I’ve seen. The whole thread is worthwhile
Its worth noting that if Putin is throwing Russia's last remaining BTGs into the fight (and there is conflicting evidence of this), the largest country in the world will be practically defenceless except for nuclear weapons.
And with the sanctions, building a new army will take much longer as Russia will need access to a large number of microchips etc. Just another one of the unprecedented examples of stupidity that VVP showed with this invasion.
Siberia exists as part of Russia now, solely because China lets it stay that way. Russians could do nothing to stop China taking whatever it wanted (but blow up the world). We have actually stepped back to US defense doctrine in the 1950s. Massive retaliation.
One of the most interesting claims in a briefing thread that is worth reading. The 75% doesn’t refer to the entire Russian Army, but more specifically to its armored fighting arm, referred to Battalion Tactical Groups.
Why this estimate is so important is because it reveals the limited options Putin faces in trying to replace the losses suffered in Ukraine. He really only has one more throw of the dice once this army is exhausted. If he wants to go all in
After that remaining 25%, the other options get pretty frightening (chemical, biological, nuclear).
U.K. MOD maps of Ukraine war today and one week ago. I know we have been hearing a great deal about how the Russian military has been getting its act together and improving its logistics, but the evidence on the ground is hard to see.
A slight advance from the north towards Luhansk, but basically stuck and maybe having to withdraw to the east of Kyiv.
I’ve been accused of being far too damning of Russian military performance from the start, however I have not seen a single example of a well planned and executed operation. From logistics to AirPower to ground movement, it all seems so patchy and chaotic.
Some reflections of where we are now strategically in the war, and whether we might be entering the second phase of the war where all sides are altering their plans. This phase could determine how long and terrible this war will be.
The first phase of the war would be the failure of Putin's original strategy. The Russians drastically underestimated Ukrainian resistance and identity, miscalculated on NATO/EU response and seemed unaware of major flaws in their own military capabilities.
They've been dealing with that miscalculation since. As They are having major problems getting enough force to Kyiv to assault the city (as opposed to long-range bombardment), maybe even weeks away from an effort. Otoh, they are dong relatively better in the south and east.
Can anyone confirm this? Would represent another sign that Ukraine is being given a range of more advanced technologies. These could be used against softer logistics targets.