Pavel Mayer Profile picture
Mar 16 25 tweets 6 min read
This reply pointed me towards another great thread from @kamilkazani I had missed, and it pointed me towards the right direction when I asked about alternatives to military containment of Russia.
The @kamilkazani thread focuses on ending the war in Ukraine by offering the Russian soldiers an attractive way out, but it does not solve the problem with Russia in the decades to come. However, the "give them salt" is an idea with great potential.
I laid out the situation how I understand it in this thread, and concluded that the only realistic future seems to be a military containment of Russia for decades, which will be expensive and disastrous for the World and for Russia.
The ideal outcome would be a democratic Russia, but democratizing Russia has failed once badly and given democracy a bad reputation with most Russians.
Going with the "salt" idea, what might be the salt that could move and change Russia as a whole? Russia once wanted to join the EU and NATO, but is just too big and would have overwhelmed the capacity of the EU to integrate and transform it; it would have been a mess.
We can see that clearly in how the EU still struggles with the much smaller countries from the eastern block, fighting corruption and old habits there and authoritarian tendencies in Hungary and Poland, but overall it became a success.
The EU is also the most successful project in removing borders, bringing peoples together and even overcoming decades of totalitarian rule and making democracy work. To me this is the model how we could make the world whole.
So let's entertain the thought Russia and all former Soviet republic would be members of the EU. Wouldn't that be great? No borders any more, the Russians in all those countries could move freely around, and the best of all: Russia would be safe, surrounded by friends.
No more need for a an ever growing buffer of states it feels it must control, and such an "EU" would probably grow even further, and might start to integrate countries like Turkey and many other countries, so "EU" would not be an appropriate name any more.
The countries would keep most of their sovereignty, but also have enough common standards and institutions to create an amount of prosperity which is almost unimaginable, and most importantly, lasting peace. So where is the catch?
First of all, the integration of all the members the EU already took on almost overwhelmed the capacity of the EU to integrate them, and also did show many problems with its structure, and there is a lot to be desired regarding the institutions of the EU, and it even lost..
...the UK as member, also thanks to the meddling of Russia and the United States. The UK is a country that is most experienced in international affairs and businesses, and the loss of the UK and its international connections and expertise is painful, especially in these times.
So the point is, that while it would be great to have Russia and Ukraine and all other former Soviet republics to live happily together in an enlarged EU, the EU alone just could not do it. The power shift in the EU would be too great,...
...and it also could not manage the necessary cultural transformation of Russia the same way like it did with Eastern Europe, where the EU is still struggling. And even if Europe would pull it off, such an EU would be a serious threat to the U.S. empire; it would break it.
So the only solution would be to integrate the USA, Europe and the former Soviet countries into something like the EU. The problem with the USA is that is also culturally very different, has weird laws, the barbaric death penalty, large inequality, political instability, ...
... the largest prison population, and has to extract wealth from all over the world to pay for its ridiculously large military. On the other hand it has the greatest thinkers and the most vibrant, innovative culture in the world. However, if this could be pulled off, ...
...creating a political and economic union of states with at least the level of integration like the EU, containing all NATO-Members plus the former Soviet Union, it would unite over 1.2 billion people in a structure of governance, creating lasting peace, rule of law,...
...and could tackle global problems like nothing the world has seen before. The problems to get there seem insurmountable, but the alternative is a new cold war, decades of increased military spending, threat of nuclear war and the danger of civil war in Russia, so I think ...
...it would be worth some serious thought. There is still a gap between the vision and where we are now, namely at war, and a Russian population that is neither fit for democracy nor desires it, but Russians understand money, and an offer to join a rich and powerful union...
...of a billion people might have some appeal. Btw, any idea how such a union could be called? The best I could come up with would be UDN, Union of Democratic Nations, which sounds boring, but boring might be good, or UFN, Union of Free Nations, which sounds a bit more vigorous.
After I came up with it googled the term "Union of Free Nations", and it exists in a map game: thefutureofeuropes.fandom.com/wiki/Union_of_… Anyway, it is not that important, but having a name can also help to bring things forward.
Another weakness of the Russian political system is that by putting the right person at the top, huge changes are possible, but Putin will make sure that no one gets into that office who might prosecute or jail him and his followers for their crimes, so that's a problem.
I don't know how a strong women at the top would work, but I heard that in Russian families the women often hold the power, and there were nine female Russian rulers, most famous Catherine the Great, so that might be an option as well.
However, you can not put an unknown or inexperienced person in that office, and you want to have someone who has governed at least a federal subject of Russia, and there is a number of women who did that, but I don't know anything about them: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_f…
It is interesting to see what other weaknesses of the Russian political system and society could be exploited to heal Russia, bring its society to the 21st century, make it a peaceful neighbor and a sane, reliable member of the international community. I see some hope now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pavel Mayer

Pavel Mayer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pavel23

Mar 18
Im dritten Thread mit Schwerpunkt "Militärluftfahrt" über der Ukraine und No-Fly-Zone geht es um politische Fragen. Er schließt an diesen Thread an:
Wenn die NATO wie im ersten Thread beschrieben professionell die Bedrohung aus der Luft unterbinden würde, würde Russland mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit taktische Atomwaffen einsetzen, aus der Vielzahl geschilderter Gründe.
Aktuell haben wir die Situation, dass die Welt sich so einig wie nie ist, dass Russland klar der Aggressor ist, und NATO und EU selten geschlossen sind, und in den USA arbeiten sogar Demokraten und Republikaner zusammen wie auch seit Ewigkeiten nicht mehr.
Read 24 tweets
Mar 18
Dies hier ist die Fortsetzung eines Threads zum Thema No-fly-zone, wo primär die militärischen Aspekte von Luftoperationen beleuchte werden: Für die Gesamteinschätzung ist aber noch ein Blick auf die Situation am Boden wichtig, und die Rolle von Drohnen.
Die meisten Schäden und Opfer werden derzeit wohl durch durch Artilleriebeschuss hervorgerufen, weil die russische Luftwaffe nicht die Lufthoheit hat, und nicht einmal die Luftüberlegenheit, wie Russland behauptet.
Die medial spektakulären Zerstörungen im Landesinnern und in Innenstädten dagegen werden oft von Marschflugkörpern verursacht, die aus dem Russischen oder Weißrussischen Luftraum von strategischen Bombern gestartet werden.
Read 25 tweets
Mar 18
Ein guter Artikel von einem Experten für Militärluftfahrt, Justin Bronk, Royal United Services Institute Research Fellow, Airpower & Technology.

Er argumentiert überzeugend, warum eine no-fly-zone keine gute Idee ist und eher Putin nützen würde.

rusi.org/explore-our-re…
Hier Bronk über seinen Artikel im Gespräch mit Ward Carroll, einem F14 Radar Intercept Officer (RIO) mit 20 Jahren Einsatzerfahrung auf US-Flugzeugträgern, Buchautor und Redakteur u.a. von military.com
Die beiden bestätigen meine bisherige Skepsis gegenüber einer eine No-Fly-Zone sowie die allgemeine Einschätzung von @timpritlove und mir über die militärische Situation, aber mit vielen Details und tiefer Sachkenntnis und zusätzlichen Informationen. Hier die wesentlichen Punkte.
Read 26 tweets
Mar 17
In the 1960/70s the extreme political left sided with the communist bloc and rallied against the U.S. government war efforts in Vietnam; today the extreme right sympathizes with Putin, helps to disseminate Russian propaganda and rallies against Ukraine support.
The symbol Z, which would be like western military marking heir vehicles with Ж or З, is a bit weird, but ok, it’s a symbol. Having normal people in Russia including children put it on their clothes and cars etc. reminds of the use of the swastika in Nazi Germany though.
Both together, use of the same symbol on military vehicles and have civilians wearing it, reminds more of the use of the swastika by SS-troups on vehicles rather than the regular Wehrmacht troups, although the Luftwaffe used randomly swastikas on planes. Am I overthinking this?
Read 24 tweets
Mar 16
You can not believe anything Putin, his officials, his oligarchs, his media or his useful idiots and bribed politicians in the West say.

Putin does not have friends, only servants.

He is not a private individual, he is a function of Russia - a Russian ruler.
A Russian ruler has one necessary attribute: Appear strong. Everything else is optional.

As long as a Russian ruler appears strong, he can do what he wants, e.g. kill many millions of his own people, and still have the approval of a majority, like Stalin, with 70% recently.
It appears that Putin is unhappy whenever his approval drops below that of Stalin and needs to take appropriate action.
Read 25 tweets
Mar 16
Hörte eben, in Russland ist gerade frisch eine neue Ausgabe von Dostojewskis "Militärische Sonderoperationen und Frieden" erschienen.
Es ist zwar immer etwas peinlich, wenn man Witze erklären muss, aber den fand ich deshalb so großartig, weil er so viel über Russland aussagt:
1) Vordergründig macht er sich über die plumpe Propaganda mit "Militärische Sonderoperation" lustig
2) Zweitens ist "Krieg und Frieden" natürlich von Tolstoi, was ein Pun auf Russlands Umgang mit der Wahrheit und Fake News ist
3) Die Vordergründigkeit von 1) lenkt leicht von 2) ab und spielt auf "Maskirowka" an, die oft praktizierte Täuschung durch Ablenkung, die aber nur..
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(