Thread by @qi7p1rc

Cops, DA's, judges, defense attorneys. All must act according to law.
Attorneys must act on *informed consent* and in accordance with law and RPC.
That means, if you demand they defend you according the laws that incriminate them for their conduct leading to arrest, they can't.

https://twitter.com/qi7p1rc/status/1506051002532737024

If attorneys *know or reasonably should know" how to defend you according to law and rules, then they cannot defend you outside of those restraints, nor can they prosecute, nor demand you follow their unlawful orders(including court orders deemed unlawful by law/ precedent).

Judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys all have the same rules of professional conduct.

There is no law/ rule that dictates *only* law enforcement and BAR members are capable of comprehending and therefore presenting as justification, the laws or Rules of prof. Conduct.

There is no law stating such. You're capable of comprehending the very same documents/laws/rules/policies etc, that they are capable and expected to comprehend in an ethical, moral, and honest manner, with integrity/accountability, knowing of their indiv. liability of their acts.

So as soon as a defender becomes aware of exculpatory information(laws/ acts of officers committed/ omitted) and *knows* that the DA won't dismiss based on the facts, and that the judge will continue the process, that lawyer *must* advise you *NOT TO* take part in a fraudulent>

Or criminal process, AND must report the fellow BAR members knowing of the unlawful conduct, to the BAR/ law enforcement.

If they know that the entire process is corrupted, then their only lawfully advisable option, would be self defense, justified by obstruction/ unlawful admin