How much is the revenue loss determined by CAG? 1. 637 Crore eKYC x ₹ 20 = ₹ 12740 Crores 2. 2491 authentication x ₹ 0.5 = ₹ 1245.5 Crores
₹ 13985.5 Crores - revenue loss due to non-fixation of price. UIDAI made a "concious" decision to forego the revenue, without any trail
The @UIDAI justified the loss saying - that is what led to increased usage.
But a small fact - Charging eKYC to private operators has no relation to mandatory #Aadhaar for rations and office attendane (which was made around the same time period) that actually led to higher auth.
How significant is the ₹ 13,985.5 Crores for @UIDAI?
₹ 12,873.93 Crores is the total expenditure of @UIDAI from its 2009 till date.
What's worse - @UIDAI is now financially autonomous (also no income tax, everything goes to "UIDAI Fund") as per #AadhaarAmendmentBill 2019 already made 550+ Crores, giving only 30 Crores to govt.
2. Their assessment that its only "two major" telcos is clearly wrong, because India back then had 4 private telco operators - and *ALL* of them threatened disconnection by 2017 Feb because @rssharma3 and @TRAI read a SC order incorrectly and coerced telcos and users to link.
So besides the new telco Jio - for every other operator reverification of KYC was a regulatory cost imposed. They bent and paid up 2000 Crores, because they had larger taxation issues with govt.
But who else it benefitted? - It created a "Minimum guarentee" of transactions for #Aadhaar authentication - that meant - more biometric devices sold, more transactions for "Aadhaar Ecosystem" third parties which develop API / tooling for reverification.
It gets even more interesting in Oct 2020 (outside the scope of Audit report) when telcos sought "scrapping of charges for Aadhaar-based e-KYC authentication"
and surprise surprise - In Oct - @UIDAI released "The Aadhaar (Pricing of Aadhaar Authentication Services) Regulations, 2021 (No. 1 of 2021)" and priced eKYC at ₹ 1 for telecom operators and ₹ 3 for other entities.
How did something that was priced ₹ 20 in 2019 - come down to ₹ 3 (Even if you discount the preferential discount of ₹ 2 to telecom service providers)?
What is the pricing mechanism?
So those who deferred determining pricing also ran firms that provided services for profit - That is small part of the #AadhaarScam
#Aadhaar officials part of private firms that use Aadhaar services for profit
Enable bank UPI with #Aadhaar OTP timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/90… . This is a frankenstein monster, under the garb of supporting UPI123Pay / feature phone #UPI support and is compromising security risk for a majority of users. Lets understand in a #Thread
UPI PIN in addition to device binding constitute the 2 factors of authentication. As any #UPI user would know, (re)setting #UPI PIN requires debit card authentication
Did you know banks don't issue debit cards in rural india? How will they use the feature phone UPI then ?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ration_st… is digitized food stamps, but crucial digitization difference is it converts a bearer instrument like stamp / coupon into a person / purpose specific instrument, embedding automatic data emission about beneficiary upon use.
The naming of this is curious. When countries around the world are discussing #CBDC / issuing new digital currency, naming a private payment instrument #eRUPI is sign of things to come (?). One can only speculate at the moment.
Are these countries also importing vaccines from India? Is #CoWIN being bundled here for vaccine access in the name of demand management tech? cc @anivar@asdofindia