Kathryn Macapagal, PhD Profile picture
Apr 14, 2022 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
as promised, here is the tale of getting #MyFirstR01 & like a good psychologist i'll go over the content (what it's about) & mostly the process (how I did it) & give some professional development advice as i am wont to do. buckle up because i wrote too much & am dysregulated 1/n
it is a large 5 year project to update an adolescent HIV prevention program I worked on as a postdoc in 2012-2013. The updates will 1) reflect contemporary HIV prevention knowledge, bc TONS has changed, 2) focus on encouraging HIV testing/PrEP uptake (not just condoms!) 2/n
3) make it more 2022, technology-wise (it was only delivered using text msg), 4) make it more gender-inclusive (previously was GBQ cis boys; I plan to expand it to trans & gender diverse teens who may benefit from HIV testing/PrEP) - read summary here bit.ly/36bqGKi 3/n
it is also an #impsci project! there are lots of unanswered Qs in #HIV digital health like, how do you reach and engage teens with programs like this outside research settings - esp LGBTQ teens who may be moving from one online space to another & not always easy to find? 4/n
and how do you do this in a constantly shifting digital landscape, when teens are often at the forefront of internet and #socialmedia things and researchers are, um, not? expert panels & interviews will come up with best practices for reaching/engaging #LGBTQ teens 5/n
and now for how i got here. being a PI of an R01 was not a thing i ever thought i'd do. but after a few years of playing supporting roles on projects & leading small scale projects of my own my forever-mentor @Mustanski told me one day "you're ready" & i was like "wut am not" 6/n
for a long time i told myself i was not PI material. i had planned to write a K that never materialized bc i had a baby and it was hard and i needed to focus on her. i came back from parental leave & struggled to find my footing. i did my job, but honestly was in a fog 7/n
but some of the projects i was on sparked some interest in other topics -- do teens know about #PrEP? what do they know? do they use apps like Gr*ndr? what are their experiences? so i did some tiny studies of my own to find out, and i was lucky they were of interest to others 8/n
fwiw i was in a good position - managing an R01, co-investigator on a few other grants that hit at the same time, so i was VERY lucky i was in a situation where my salary was covered and where my colleagues were happy for me to tack on my misc questions to their projects 9/n
those mini studies helped me realize that i wanted to focus on teens, sexual health & technology and less on other things. they led me to apply for and get some small/medium size grants. i had more questions that the other studies i was working on could not answer. 10/n
by this point I knew I was capable, but I was legit afraid of the process of conceptualizing & writing the grant & getting shredded in review. so, I said i was interested in doing it but delayed and hemmed and hawed until i got the mentorly nudge to do the dang thing already 11/n
we came up w/ the idea of building on the project i worked on as a postdoc. my notes say we first sat down to do this 3/22/2019 (let that sink in). in summer 2019 i collected some more pilot data & checked with our youth advisors to see if the idea was still relevant 12/n
then i set a deadline of jan 2020 (note to self, avoid jan deadline bc your holidays will suck). i worked on this grant a TON for 4-5 months. i went between feeling hopeful, confident, excited to feeling literal despair & fear that i'd never finish it & that i'd never get it 13/n
i cried in the bathroom to @michellebirkett & during a meeting w @DrMNewcomb bc of fear/stress. bless you kind souls. Michael gave me this A+ advice: it won't feel like it's going to come together until the last minute so the sooner you accept that the better off you'll be 14/n
i submitted it in Jan 2020 and was proud of myself. study section met on Friday March 13, 2020 womp womp, and I got my score and summary statement back around the time we were told to stay home because of the pandemic. 50th percentile, impact 60. 15/n
the pandemic took the sting out of the score, but getting it scored was still a win i am told. i reworked it, got more pilot data in response to concerns, resubmitted sept 2020. study section met before thanksgiving. 27th percentile, impact 44. not high enough to get funded 16/n
at this point you need to submit a new application. i reworked again. i got external reviewers (thx @Judymosk @NUCATSInstitute!) i submitted may 2021. reviews came in july. 14th percentile. impact score 30. i was early stage investigator which gives you an edge for 1st R01 17/n
i responded to reviewer critiques & was told not to resubmit. I got "just in time"/JIT request for more info in october. status went to "pending" in nov 2021, which was exciting. then i waited a LONG time, was asked for more JIT info in march, then it said "award prepared"! 18/n
and it was awarded on 4/5/2022 *over 3 years after i decided i'd write it*. now that you have also waited a long time:
1) stay excited about an idea or set of ideas you believe in even when they get rejected repeatedly. explore them in different ways in the meantime. 19/n
2) get yourself some mentors and peers who will look at your work a million times and who share successful and unsuccessful grants with you. this was CRITICAL in seeing what they have in common and what worked/didn't. 20/n
3) grants involve a mountain of paperwork and it can feel overwhelming. but it has gotten easier (even more exciting) to write grants since i tackled one. be nice to yourself. eat snacks. take breaks. do things you love even when you don't feel like you have time 21/n
4) accept that the review process sometimes works out for you and sometimes doesn't. i've been a reviewer. sometimes solid grants don't do well and sometimes ok ones do better for various reasons. getting review experience gives you insight into writing to please reviewers 22/n
5) you don't need a K or an R21 or an R34 to get an R01. I had supplements, pilot grants, and experience running/being co-investigator on big R and U grants. if you have the expertise + experience + team + idea + pilot data + access to infrastructure, go for it 23/n
6) it's ok if you don't know if you want to be a PI. it's ok to figure it out along the way. it's ok to decide you don't want to do it anymore. it's ok to know you want to be a PI all along. all are valid. as @Mustanski told me ca. 2012, there are many ways to be a scientist 24/n
looking forward to continuing this science adventure with my wonderful investigative team @denhli @Mustanski @DrMNewcomb who was there every step of the way.
caveat: i only know what *i* did to get here! i invite others to share their pearls of wisdom! /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kathryn Macapagal, PhD

Kathryn Macapagal, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_karmacap

Sep 20, 2022
Love this keynote on #digitalhealth #equity @CourtneyRLyles #isrii11. We assume everyone has consistent access to wifi, devices, broadband but many groups who have the most need may not. How can we go beyond our typical spheres of influence to impact health? More info in paper 👇🏼 Image
another takeaway: consider whether relying on a particular research method in #digitalhealth excludes certain groups (eg lower digital literacy, differential access to devices and internet connectivity). consider using multiple ways of gathering data during co-design #isrii11 Image
re #digitalhealth implementation for #healthequity — the setting and context are important! design for the setting it will be implemented in up front, with continuous stakeholder input & partnerships with community from the beginning #isrii11 Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 26, 2020
Went to an engaging workshop on Twitter for academics led by the fab @rdmersey, Professor & Assoc dean of research @MedillSchool @NorthwesternU. She grounded the talk in research on media & psychology (👌🏼) & since I still consider myself a twitter noob here were my takeaways:
Consistency of engagement is more important than quantity of engagement. The algorithms reward you for regular logins, regular posts/engagement, regularly following people who share your interests. A minute of checking Twitter every day > bingeing on it once a week 🤳
Think about retweeting like a cocktail party 🍸🍸- connecting people or passing on good info that may be useful to others. Don’t retweet without reading something - RTing can come across as if you are endorsing something (even if you say RT doesn’t equal endorsement in your bio)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(