Putrino Lab Profile picture
May 6 11 tweets 4 min read
Short 🧵on symptom measurement in #LongCovid / #MECFS and other chronic illnesses. We need to do better. Many of the symptoms that we're trying to track don't have a physical biomarker, and while patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are helpful, then need to be far more (1/n)
rigorously developed. Let's pick on fatigue as a #LongCovid symptom, because it is incredibly disabling for most folks with LC and it is not well characterized. To measure fatigue, my team uses the Fatigue Severity Scale. Why? Because it is well-validated and allows us to (2/n)
reliably track change in response to interventions. Is it perfect? Far, far from it. The FSS gives us a reliable, but basic understanding of fatigue severity and how it is impacting daily life. What it doesn't do, however, is help us to differentiate different causes and (3/n)
subtypes of fatigue. This is a problem, because this means that we can't better understand if certain interventions are helping certain types of fatigue and not others. We need to put resources into developing better instruments that identify and measure more nuanced (4/n)
variables that are representative of the experiences of people with #LongCovid. For instance, all fatigue is not made equal: let's explore three types of "fatigue" (there are many more):
1) Fatigue from REM sleep disruption: You feel sleepy, foggy, emotionally labile
(5/n)
2) Fatigue from #dysautonomia: Often will feel like someone literally flipped a switch and now you're fighting to remain conscious.
3) Fatigue from oxidative stress/mitochondrial dysfunction: You feel like you're trapped in...acidic jelly - hard to move, sluggish, burning (6/n)
All three of these fatigue types exist in #LongCovid (and #MECFS, and other chronic illnesses), but because of decades of research that has failed to center patient voices and engage in community co-design, we have not developed instruments to investigate these things. (7/n)
Why does this matter? Because if you don't have a sensitive instrument to measure a symptom, it leads to challenges in understanding the effect an intervention is having: autonomic rehab won't influence your fatigue if your fatigue is from mitochondrial dysfunction, but we (8/n)
don't have an instrument to differentiate the two, so instead we have "responders" and "non-responders" in clinical trials where the effect sizes don't reach statistical significance because we weren't characterizing this nebulous symptom of "fatigue" precisely enough in (9/n)
the first place. So where do we go from here? Let's start developing detailed PROs for these "hard to characterize" #LongCovid symptoms! @NIH: if you funded groups like @patientled and @itsbodypolitic to hire psychometricians, they could activate their community and do (10/n)
this in a heartbeat. STOP funding establishment researchers that have consistently failed to involve the community they are supposed to be SERVING (not heartlessly studying) in their research. Until this work gets done, well, it's very hard to treat what we can't measure (end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Putrino Lab

Putrino Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PutrinoLab

May 4
Ok. Another request, another 🧵. Today, we address the strained relationship between psychology, psychiatry and #LongCovid. Much of this may also apply to #pwME and other infection-associated chronic illnesses (h/t again @microbeminded2) and other “invisible” illnesses (1/n)
Psychology and psychiatry have a complex history with syndromic illnesses. Why? When illnesses are diagnosed on the basis of symptoms rather than “objective” tests, some clinicians will doubt the reality of the condition. Let’s start by psychoanalyzing them, shall we? (2/n)
This behavior is not justifiable, scientific or ethical. But it is also is not new: in the 1800s, tuberculosis was regarded by most physicians as the “disease of the sensitive” before tubercule bacillum was discovered, the “cancer personality” was touted for decades (3/n)
Read 22 tweets
May 1
Ok. As promised, here is a super-🧵 on cognition and #LongCovid. This will be a combination of published material and things that we have observed in-clinic. This is not intended to be definitive nor epidemiological and so it is highly likely that your personal experience (1/n)
may deviate significantly. This is about my reading and experience of cognition and #LongCovid but from what I have seen shared in the comments of my tweet yesterday, it seems that much of this may apply to other infection-associated chronic illnesses (h/t @microbeminded2) (2/n)
such as #MECFS, #Lyme and #dysautonomia/#POTS to name a few. Let’s start out with naming. I try not to use the term “brain fog” because I don’t think it conveys the seriousness. People with LC are experiencing cognitive dysfunction that often results in cognitive impairment (3/n)
Read 25 tweets
Apr 14
To the #MECFS community: I feel I owe an explanation to you for behavior that many of you have noticed. When this whole, mad journey into #LongCovid began, I barely considered myself an "expert" (whatever that word means) in LC, let alone ANY simple understanding of ME/CFS. (1/n)
My clinic had never seen a person with #MECFS, I had not deeply read the literature, and I didn't feel I had anything to bring to the conversation. I focused on #LongCovid and tried not to think about or mention ME/CFS. Not because I didn't care about this community, but (2/n)
because *my own insecurities about my lack of knowledge* led me to clam up. I recognize, wholeheartedly, that this was the wrong approach. Many of my statements/publications/media would benefit greatly from inclusion of the #MECFS community. I've been blessed to learn (3/n)
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
There is a critical need for the clinical world to move on from the misguided understanding that physical inactivity is harmful ABOVE ALL ELSE. Physical activity and exercise (even mild) is very clearly harmful for so many people with #LongCOVID. A thread (1/n)
Consider a car crash survivor with severe multi-organ damage, you don't tell them "look, every minute you're lying in this bed you're becoming unfit! Let's get you on a treadmill". That’s insane. Yet, many with #LongCOVID are being told this insanity daily (2/n)
We know the multisystem benefits of exercise for those who have normative physiology. We get it. People with #LongCOVID no longer have normative physiology. We must solve the underlying issues causing #LongCOVID before clearing people to return to exercise if that's a goal (3/n)
Read 5 tweets
Nov 7, 2021
Since the "I'm recovered, but..." variant of #LongCovid seemed to resonate here, let me share the next part of my personal thought process on this: we need a metric in medicine for how much effort someone has to put into feeling ok. So many people feel "conditionally ok" (1/n)
"I can feel ok so long as I do x, y and z religiously, otherwise my health gets really bad" - this is often not viewed as pathology, and this is a trap that many #LongCovid patients may fall into - fine so long as they put an incredible amount of effort into their health (2/n)
This is why historically excluded groups and people living near the poverty line will be disproportionately affected by #LongCovid: the amount of time and effort required to stay healthy will not be compatible with the lifestyles of many, leading to worsening disability (3/n)
Read 5 tweets
Sep 27, 2021
I feel like the #LongCovid community has experienced a weekend of intense reflection and self-effacing conversation (because of *that* @NewYorker article) about what it means to be an ally and advocate. Phenomenal content from @itsbodypolitic and others on what it means to (1/n)
be a patient-led advocate and ally, so I wanted to start a thread on what it means to be a clinical and research ally for #LongCovid. @DhruvKhullar's @NewYorker article was bad. In the face of backlash, he tried to explain that the piece was intended as a call to action (2/n)
for #LongCovid. The LC community disagreed. Resoundingly. If we take @DhruvKhullar at his word - he was genuinely trying to help - how then, did his piece miss the mark so badly, and what lessons can us as clinicians learn about how to be an ally and advocate to patients? (3/n)
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(