Wish to speculate that this report is quite wrong. Various reliable sources are reporting that #Zarichne & #Khotimlya have been captured by #Ukraine, after crossing the wide (dammed) Siverskyi Donets river, Though its possible that DRG units crossed for reconnaissance & sabotage,
I don't believe there is an actual bridgehead established there. Certainly not one with armored vehicles and a supply route. I commented earlier on this:
The thread's 1st images show that as of May 18th, the bridges at Staryi Saltiv & Rubizhne are still
destroyed. Though there is much cloud cover, no visible pontoon bridge is seen elsewhere on the river. What is perhaps more likely, and caused the misreporting, is that #Ukrainian DRG units crossed at the still intact bridge (at least as of May 13th) around Starytsya & attacked
towards Vovchansk, which is a major supply hub. The river here is narrow and the #Ukrainian special forces may have navigated through the forest (as they like to do) north of Rubizhne & unexpectedly crossed at this bridge. This is why one of the original sources of the report
reads that the they are already in the outskirts of Vovchansk. Note the report's "presumably" sentence regarding location of the crossing is nonsensical & either intentionally vague or in error. This commando raid to disrupt the supply routes makes more sense.
Additionally, if successful in blocking, then it would make sense to move in units into the southern towns and perhaps that is why they were shelled (from the west bank in preparation). This is an imaginative Ukrainian operation, instead of the fantastical one that was reported.
Using the DPA map (who is excellent), will show what I mean. Special DRG or other UA units may have established firing positions across the donets further north, in an attempt to cut off the supply & reinforcement route (since there are such few RU forces in the area, relying on
the natural barrier of the river). At the same time artillery from Staryi Saltiv shelled the east bank (hopefully RU positions and not random parts of the villages), in preparation for crossing. Additionally it is possible that some DRG units crossed here as well, but if so, have
likely crossed back since the main supply route from the north was not in fact cut and no secure bridgehead has been established anywhere on the east bank. It is even likely that the village of Starystya was bypassed by skillful navigation and not captured by UA forces. Thus, any
light forces presence on the east bank, in the north or south of the sector must be either very quickly reinforced and strengthened, or withdrawn. It has now been too long, and RU forces have had plenty of time to reinforce along these main routes. Additionally Russian
counterattacks from Ternova & elsewhere threaten to cut off the entire UA effort eastwards in the area. In this sector, forces on both sides are thin, and UA has redeployed more units to the critical Donbass fights recently. As it stands, it does not have the strength to push
eastwards to cut off the critical hubs in the area such as Vovchansk and Velyki Burluk. Other #Ukrainian forces however, from the Chuhuiv area continue to attempt an eastward advance towards the critical RU hub of Kupyansk. If they succeeded, it would collapse the RU #Izum front.
UA forces are using significant artillery in this effort, but it is an obvious one, and Russian reinforcements for the moment seem to be enough to stop them. Attack is much more complex than defense, and the UA forces will find out that if they advance, they need to do so on a
wide enough front or simply get lured in and cut off by the Russian forces who appear to be trying to just that in several sectors. We shall see if time finds me correct, or sorely mistaken, my bold assertions turned to mere folly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The #Russian counterattack in #Kharkhov aims to cut off Ukrainian troops that advanced too far north and east from the city. It is aiming for the Kharkhov - Staryi Saltiv road (T2014) and to retake a town around Cherkaksi and/or Ruski Tyshky, trapping UA forces north of that all
the way to Lyptsi. The reason this is possible is because there is a dense forest on the west flank of the Kharkhov - Lyptsi road. The troops could be fully or semi trapped because of this as there are no major, even secondary roads through the forest. Whether troop encirclements
Note the Russian shelling so far south of the front line as of yesterday. Two days ago the front was even further north, as Ternova & Rubizhne were captured by Russia in the beginning of this counteroffensive. The front is sparse with units and RU had been tactically withdrawing.
No time for a full update on the northern #Popasna front & salient. However, note that light RU forces, perhaps airborne troops, are advancing along my preferred previously quoted route. After #Popasna's fall, I had indicated that though #Bakhmut is the obvious target, terrain,
fortification and conditions dictated a more creative #Russian advance. The road northwards was open to advance, the key target #Vrubivka, & westwards the attack needed to be on the north side of the entrenchments on the Popasna - Bakhmut road, perhaps along the railway line,
towards Soledar. This is exactly what is developing thus far. Taking my previous image, have added red rectangles to indicate the latest #Russian advances aligning with the preferred routes I had indicated. Since the Russian attempt to cross the Siverskyi Donets is either stalled
Lots to update elsewhere, but a word on the salient south of #Popasna, that often gets overlooked. Using livemap (typically a bit outdated & w a UA bias). Firstly, this salient is very important for several reasons. The blue are represents a general heavily fortified area of the
#Ukrainian front. It guards the critical junctions of #Bakhmut and #Kostyantynivka. The Horlivka (RU) front, has not moved very much the entire war due to these heavy entrenchments. Note the two main roads south from Bakhmut that feed this front. Also note the important railway
from #Poapsna (now under RU control). Finally, two important cities, #Svitlodarsk & #Myronivskyi are behind this front. It would be very difficult for RU to attempt to take these by frontal attack. Cutting off one of these roads would be a strong blow to this front & both
The #Russian counteroffensive in Kharkhov has begun, now that UA troops are far from the large city. More Ukrainian shelling towards the east bank, but more evidence that there is no bridgehead there. Also seems like #Ternova was recaptured by RU. Believe I was alone in reporting
the developing counterattack in #Ternova (which threatens to cut off UA forces trying to push east) couple of days ago. One thing is advancing against stiff enemy resistance (as RU is doing in the #Donbass). Another is doing so, invited by tactical enemy withdrawals.
You run the risk of being lured into a trap, at the very least, you are going along with your enemy's plans instead of disrupting them. The war in strategic terms, is getting more interesting.
A word about the ongoing #Azovstal surrender and its effect on the #Donbass front. I believe it is no coincidence that the #Russian advance (and #Ukrainian retreat, if not collapse) has gained speed precisely as the surrender proceeds. Sure part of it is simply
the obvious combined effect on the two armies. #Russian troops' morale is raised by their long awaited victory. If even the lionized soldiers of #Azov are surrendering, certainly those lesser #Ukrainian ones in front them can be defeated as well - goes the thinking. On the other
hand, #Ukrainian troops' morale plummets as their lionized if not idolized, invincible troops at #Azovstal surrender. Not even defeated in battle, fighting to the last, as #Zelensky so badly wanted them to do, but surrendering. They want to live thinks the UA soldier holding
The avg reply to this comment is quite disappointing in terms of basic knowledge of our political landscape. We can of course disagree w each other but it would be nice if we knew what we were disagreeing with. You can disagree with @RandPaul's (& father's) championing of liberty
. Many in fact do and may say that such extreme personal freedom is too much and that societies need the government to drastically restrict & regulate this freedom. But to deny that Rand Paul supports this freedom is to not have any idea what his beliefs are (not surprising given
the state of our media). Because if he doesn't champion liberty, then certainly no one else in the US Senate does. And neither does nearly any politician in high office on earth.