Share this page!

STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
Twitter logo
May 22 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Spurious claims by this organisation considering there's no case number by the complainant nor other documentation available.

This is the problem over the last few weeks. We've been so littered in misinformation to the point that the public doesn't know what's true/false...
1⃣ It was 'unsurprising' to the claimant that their filing for JR & was refused & subsequently their appeal.

But of course it would be due to the glaring obvious that their claim was about an issue not directly involving the British Govt.
2⃣ It is untrue that 11/12 US proposed ammendments to the IHR (2005) are 'off the table'.

According to the current #WHA75 plenary, the text for US ammendments could well be discussed, but that doesn't mean adoption of those ammendments either.
3⃣ It's false that a remaining ammendment would 'instruct new changes to be placed into national legislation within 6 months'.

Art. 59-64 IHR refers to the rejection/reservation process for members & the US proposed to ammend this to 6 months instead of 18. Not domestic laws.
The IHR Review Committee noted that 'no major ammendments are needed at this stage'.

Even with an adoption of US ammendents to the IHR, the public can continue to pressure Govts to provide clarity & make reservations on any ammendments that could impinge on sovereignty.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1528347…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌

STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @org_scp

STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
May 13
This particular graphic has been circulating & widely used for some months. It's misinformative & requires further clarity:

1⃣ The US is one of 194 signatories to the IHR (2005), its biggest update since 1969. These regs *do not* 'override & supercede' the US Constitution...
2⃣ The US ammendments to the IHR concern greater collaboration & commucation in the event of a future PHEIC & detail nothing about allowing the WHO to bypass sovereignty.

Other nations can object or make reservations to these ammendments set out within Article 59-64 of the IHR.
3⃣ No vote will take place in #Geneva #Switzerland at the 75th WHA on IHR ammendments nor sign any Treaty into international law.

The Assembly are set to 'consider' these ammendments. There has to be time for other WHO nations to respond & make reservations.
Read 8 tweets
STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
May 10
🧵 Interesting discussion. Some further clarification:

1⃣ No decision was made to supercede the Bill of Rights, Constitution or the sovereignty of any WHO member state.

2⃣ There's no uniform way of the WHO overriding members domestic legislation during a PHEIC.
3⃣ Francis correctly pointed out that the IHR is not codified within UK domestic legisation.

The WHO have IHR 'focal points' within each member state, i.e. to provide better comms with WHO & its members especially during a PHEIC - public health emergency of intl concern.
4⃣ We also agree with Francis that there's no need for a new Treaty.

If all WHO members upheld IHR treaty obligations over the past 2 years, incl. advice from WHO Emergency Committee, all we'd require within the next few years is a further strengthening of the IHR.
Read 5 tweets
STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
May 4
🌍 15 years ago, the International Health Regulations (2005) came into effect after the SARS pandemic of 2002-2004, signed by some 194 nations.

This could have been interpreted then as the same power grab being speculated about today with the New Pandemic Treaty.

(contd.)
It's important amongst the speculation, fear, & clickbait articles being recycled that we understand exactly what we're dealing with & in what capacity, if any. *could* the WHO begin to override the sovereignty of parliamentary democracies.

(contd.)
We believe that there's been *some* degree of misdirection regarding the fear of this NPT.

As we've said before, over the past two years the majority of WHO members have effectively torn up guidance from the WHO Emergency Committee, IHR & other international instruments.
Read 4 tweets
STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
Apr 15
🚨 We've already told you that multi-million £ contracts have been awarded for the continued maintenance & development of Test & Trace incl. the #NHS #COVID19 app.

But it gets worse. @NHSDigital are hiring for *permanent* #COVIDPass management ⤵️

jobs.digital.nhs.uk/vacancies/1896…
🛂 The Govt removed their advice/guidance for the domestic #NHS #CovidPass on April 1st & that it would remain on the NHS app for a 'limited period'.

This is in stark contrast to the job opportunities from @NHSDigital

Now we know they don't want this going anywhere.
We maintain that it's naive for any individual or organisation to conclude that simply because the legal reqs to present an #NHS #CovidPass at certain events & venues were dropped, that it was finished.

Another wake up call for everyone that we're not done with this yet.
Read 5 tweets
STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
Apr 14
🇦🇺 #Australia: It's been an international disgrace that #COVID19 unvaccinated citizens have continually been detained from departing their shores with little exception.

But from 18th April, it looks like there's some hope.

homeaffairs.gov.au/covid19/unvacc…
We condemn @ScottMorrisonMP & all other state leaders who've kept Australians separated from the international community, using maximum coercion so that people would inject for their fundamental right to leave their own nation & return to it.

A basic Human Right.
They can spin whatever nonsense they like about the Biosecurity Act (2015) & International Health Regulations (2005) because *we* know they're talking bollocks.

Just like this speaker here with Senator Remmick 🐍
Read 4 tweets
STOPCOMMONPASS 🛂 🆔 ❌ Profile picture
Apr 13
Well done to Dr Tess Lawrie & World Council for Health for their tireless work on #StopTheTreaty.

We also share their deep concerns on what could be in place within the next two years & have some further thoughts on this below ⤵️

(contd.)

drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/urgent-my-vi…
After previous pandemics, e.g. SARS, it's normal practice to update & strengthen global health security & overall preparedness

The International Health Regulations were updated & adopted in 2005, coming into force in 2007.

There was no need for a separate 'pandemic treaty'.
All 194 WHO member nations have a legal obligation to uphold the IHR (2005), but this doesn't mean the WHO can interfere or bypass national sovereignty.

If all nation members followed their obligations over the past two years we would have seen much less restrictions.. (contd.)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(