The primary lesion isn't enough to make the diagnosis. You're going to need the primary lesion AND time from rash onset to know what you should be expecting to see. 2/
The prodrome that occurs before the rash includes the typical ILI type symptoms of fever, malaise, headache, pharyngitis, and cough. Lymphadenopathy has been billed as a distinguishing feature of MPX from smallpox and Varicella.
3/
The @CDCgov reports that the dermatologic manifestations start in the mouth and on the tongue. Then progress to the skin after a certain amount of time.
Macules for 1-2 days
Papules for 1-2 days
Vesicles for 1-2 days
Pustules for 5-7 days
Crusted over for 7-14 days 4/
Unlike other viral processes (like VZV) that start on the trunk and move out, MPX starts in the mouth/face and moves down the limbs.
Also, unlike VZV that has lesions in multiple stages, MPX progresses through stages together for each body part.
I just wanted to point out this is the perfect example of why #dermatologic training can be so difficult. We train our residents to think horses when they hear hoofbeats, but we as derms have to know the zebras. This is where knowing the zebra can help you diagnose early! 6/
And one final poll for my #dermtwitter nerds: Even though multiple primary morphologies are reported, what do you think is the "true primary morphology" for MPX?
7/
I personally would vote vesicles, because I think the M/P phases are just pre-vesicular, and we always say that any vesicle turns into a pustule after a few days.
That said, I do think it's important to emphasize the macular and papular phases for the sake of early diagnosis! 8/
That's it! Since I haven't personally seen a patient, I wanted to stay in my lane and comment on morphology and clinical recognition. I'll leave the broader commentaries to other folks here on #medtwitter.
Stay safe out there!
9/9
One more thing: the actual vesicle looks a bit herpetic. “Dewdrop on a rose petal” but the dew is pus, and the drop is bigger!
Another observation I’m not certain about (& would ❤️ other opinions)- looks like they don’t cluster like hsv/vzv; they stay relatively discrete!
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an autoimmune blistering disorder that can be triggered by drugs!
Hey #medtwitter, what do you think is one of common culprits for causing this eruption?
2/ You'd be correct if you said vancomycin!
Vanco triggers IgA to attack proteins in the hemidesmosome that holds epidermis to the basement membrane. That means this is a part of the PEMPHIGOID group.
So you get TENSE blisters with a NEGATIVE NIKOLSKY.
3/ For the #dermatology residents who need to memorize this, remember that the antigen that is targeted is the 97 kDa portion of the extracellular domain found in BPAg2.
For everyone, remember this is part of the pemphigoiD (D for deep) group, hence the exam findings.
2/ The "pemphigus" part of the name means we are similarly dealing with an EPIDERMAL blistering disease, much like it's better known cousin, "pemphigus vulgaris" (PV).
If you haven't had a chance yet, take a look at my prior #tweetorial on PV:
3/ Before we get into the nitty gritty details of PF vs PV, a reminder that in pemphiguS, we're dealing with a SUPERFICIAL desmosome antigen target, so compared with pemphigoiD (that's DEEP), you're still going to get the + nikolsky, flaccid bullae, etc.
2/ If you answered, "hands, feet, and ears," you're correct! This is tricky, and it wasn’t until dermatology residency that I learned it’s not palms and soles!
If you haven't yet, take a look at my old #tweetorial on acral rashes as a primer.
What color do you expect to see when you hear NXG?
2/ Yes, yellow! Whenever you hear something is “xanthomatous,” expect to see something yellow on exam! Kudos to all of you who guessed some form of a xanthomatous process on our prior mystery diagnosis tweet!👇
3/ This diagnosis occurs classically by the eyes and correspondingly can cause ophthalmologic issues, so for those of you who suggested a referral to ophtho, absolutely agree!