While the organisation hyperbolically
slammed India, reality is that their own house stinks.
This thread exposes them clearly.
2/n Their Constitution states that Sharia shall be the principal source of legislation(of course for non-Muslims too)then why should u impose our (Indian)legal proceedings based on Sharia?
Will #Qatar@OIC_OCI let Indian Constitution work for matter wrt to Hindus in their land?
3/n Interestingly, however wrong it may be the “Hindu Majoritarian” state as they state, has let Sharia be the principal source for civil legislation of Muslims.
#Qatar@OIC_OCI but look at your audacity. Let me expose you more as what I hv stated is just too mild for a bully.
4/n Now let’s come to the Penal Codes pertaining to religion.
Article 256 (check snippet)asks imprisonments for 7 years for so many things including Offending, misinterpreting or violating the Holy Quran & many more?
5/n Certainly @OIC_OCI#Qatar has no provision of punishment for below:
A) Insulting any Non-Muslim God through writing, drawing, gesturing or in any other way or through any other means.
B) Offending, misinterpreting or violating the texts like Vedas, Gita
6/n C)Offending the Hinduism or any of its rites.
D) Cursing any of the divine religions according to the regulations of Dharmashastras.
E)Insulting any of the Avatars through writing, drawing, gesturing or in any other way or through any other means.
7/n F) Sabotaging, breaking, damaging or violating sites or their contents if they are made to perform Dharmik rites for one of the Sampradaya according to the discourse of Dharmashastras?
8/n #Qatar or any member of @OIC_OCI has no regulations to safeguard those things for Hindus as they have for Muslims?
So how dare they expect their public morality be parameter for Bharat when they don’t even let Bhartiya Religions to propagate & practice in public?
9/n Point is that how can they try their whip over Bharat where Muslims can openly practice Islamic rituals while #Qatar & other @OIC_OCI members don’t even have mildest of such situations for Hindus?
10/n We have legally registered Self Proclaimed Muslim Newspaper @milligazette in India, which has been offending Hindus since decades.
They have been maligning Hindu Dharma & Shastras through continual misinterpretation.
Here is one eg, milligazette.com/Archives/15082…
12/n The current lead editor of @milligazette, @khan_zafarul had openly threatened for action by Arab world, & then choses to be editor in chief of paper which has history of demeaning Hinduism day & night.
13/n So people like Zafar want Hindus to be under brut globally. They want to demean Hindus here, support Rioters & then want Arab world to act upon us too.
Will @khan_zafarul like rule like Article 256 of #Qatar with respect to Hindus? You can’t have your cake & eat it too.
14/n Why should #Qatar poke nose in our Rashtra affairs when Indian State never questioned you ever that why you don’t let Hindus have rights under Article 256 too?
If Blasphemy is under your public morality, is only subject to Muslim sentiments we have FoE rule equally for all.
15/n Even if I don’t go much far in history, the Hindu Sentiments were mocked upon continually with respect to Shiv Ling?
Imagine @OIC_OCI that Article 246 of #Qatar applied here with Hindu customisations.
16/n Now imagine another case. If someone mocked Islam & related xyz, & in response someone mocked Hindu Deity in #Qatar.
Will latter ever be punished? No but former will surely get punished.
But you expect otherwise in Bharat.
17/n So @OIC_OCI lets do a task of replacing word “Islam” with “Hindu” in article 257 & 258 from #Qatar Penal Code?
Will it ever be acceptable? Let me rephrase it by replacing the words. Read below:
“Whoever establishes, organizes or runs an assembly, association,
18/n organization or a branch aimed at opposing or challenging the basics and tenets of #Hinduism , or calls upon, or favors or promotes another religion; cult or concept shall be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. “
Read it with Article 258
19/n Now let’s retrospect a bit @OIC_OCI philosophically.
#Qatar simply can’t allow “Murti of Gods” in public because it is against Islam.
The truth is that “Kalma” that is read aloud 5 times a day is against core of Hindu Dharma. So, by your own law, this should be banned.
20/n But @OIC_OCI , we know that however offending it is to the Hindu principles, it is core of Islam & we never brought any restriction upon it. Any Muslim is free to read Kalma in public without any legal impact.
Only loudspeakers & road blocking etc are under radar.
21/n So, the members of @OIC_OCI don’t let the children of Bharat, the Dharmiks observe Dharma in public but children of Abraham are free to observe their faith openly.
& you show audacity to preach us. Amazing!
22/n While by article 258 #Qatar bans promotion of any other religions, Indian Constitution not only guarantees Freedom to propagate.
Such is our freedom extent that even to claim the illegally possessed Hindu Places we have to fight battle legally.
23/n God Forbid, power dynamics changes in 100-200 years & atheist world takes over Mecca. Will you not fight it back, once you again are back to power?
The Islamic Texts themselves speak firmly of how Mandirs were broken & Masjid built. Why @OIC_OCI should stand against unjust?
24/n Personally I won’t ever ask @OIC_OCI members to bend their rules in own country for it s derived of local public morality. I don’t have any crazy passion of imposing liberal democracy as USA does. All I ask is to respect our Public Morality.
25/n @OIC_OCI is doing exactly what they blame USA and very rightly for imposing Liberal Democracy. The only difference of that they wish Sharia principles to be public morality for Indians (Muslims favour) too.
More explanations from 26/n
26/n Moving further @OIC_OCI , the article 259 & 260 of #Qatar Penal Code considers any debate around Islam invites prison of 5 years.
Then by your logic will it be #Islamophobia if India prohibits debate around Hinduism by Muslim think tanks, people & journals?
27/n If you can’t let any questioning of Islam in your country why should you expect good treatment & no reaction when some Muslim engage in questioning basic tenants of Hinduism?
But wait! We don’t do it, that’s why press like @milligazette yet exist.
1/n As @akshaykumar , said in an interview that our text books only talk about Invaders & not prominent Indian Kings, usual offenders like @zoo_bear@ashoswai began to attack him personally.
In this thread, I expose their lies and how Akshay is correct.
2/n Zubair posts this page from NCERT History book for class VII and foolishly tried to mock @akshaykumar without knowing how lame he would end up being.
The chapter itself is called "The Delhi Sultans" as if no Rajas ruled the place.
3/n Interestingly the chapter doesn't makes a single mention of "Lal Kot" founded by Anangpal Tomar.
It completely misses to mention about the name Dillika, by which Delhi was known in the Tomar Period.
The chapter also talks least about findings beneath Purana Quila.
"The original building was a structure of the Din-i Ilahi faith."
& claimed, "Aurangzeb didn't break the Vishvanath Temple at Kashi. No farman talks of it."
Fallacies exposed in this thread
2/n The root of the Din-i illahi argument & many other non-historical ones comes from the opinions collected by Mary Searle-Chatterjee in 1993 (Religious division and the mythology of the past).
Check these snippets from doc. I've highlighted the Din-i Illahi part.
3/n So for the information of @KaleemulHafeez, even that argument what local Muslim gave to Mary held opinion that most certainly Aurangzeb had pulled down the structure for his hostility towards Akbar's religious policy.
So even Kaleemul need to do some readings before quoting.
I’m not entertaining you, so no point being disappointed.
I said, that I’ll debunk each source one by one.
If you already knew that Ashokvadana isn’t true about Pushyamitra then why did you mention it as primary source?
Lengthy thread, because that’s how you analyse.
Where there is single source to prove of oral tradition?
So Buddhists were so weak that they couldn’t even write inscriptions? Ashoka was known for it.
“(...) If there were no Shivaji everyone would have been circumcised.”
Granthavali of Kavi Bhushan, quoted in (Oxford in India readings, Themes in Indian history.)
Kavi Bhushan was living in times of Shivaji
The earlier lines are mentioned below:
“The Muslims have destroyed all our temples; they are hoisting ‘Ali’s flag everywhere; rajas have fled; everywhere one sees (Muslim) pirs (saints), and payghambars (prophets), nowhere Hindu sants and sddhis; Kashi has lost its splendor and there are mosques in Mathura.”
In his opinion it was Ch. Shivaji who could save Bharat from Islamisation.
Here is one more poem by great Kavi Bhushan at Birla House :
Important thread wrt claim that the element found is not a #Shivling but a remnant of a fountain.
First I'm sharing arguments to assert it to be fountain is vague (from perspective of a student of Architecture).
Parties may refute it or use in court if found substantial.
Well, the structure must be of the era of Aurangzeb should it be part of "Fountain Jet" or "fawwara."
Then one needs to look at the working of landscape architecture of that era. This paper gives a very good details & I shall use it as source jstor.org/stable/4415632…
When Babur came to Bharat (Hindustan in his words), he found only "Saqia" (rehet) the most effective method to pull water up.
The paper also explains that "gravity" was major method & when water-body was close-by (Ganga here) , it was the source.