Few observations on the prospect of #NATO enlargement after spending a week of meetings in #Stockholm 🇸🇪 and #Istanbul🇹🇷 1/n
The issue of Turkish objection to Swedish and Finish membership will not fix itself. The two countries have very different perception of the legitimacy of the other side’s demands. Don’t expect this issue to go away before the #Madrid#NATO Summit. 2/n
The issue easiest to take off the table bilaterally is Swedish de-facto arms embargo vis-a-vis Turkey. Swedes understand that they should be open to selling arms to any Ally when they join #NATO.
The Kurdish issue is going to be much harder - both because the two sides don’t agree on whether or not Sweden supports PKK politically and financially. But also because support for Kurds is a big political issue both in Sweden and in Turkey.
In Turkey, President Erdogan’s opposition to Sweden and Finland joining NATO improved his approval rating - that’s a big deal given the upcoming elections and a very thought economic situation in Turkey that saps government’s support.
Many observers in Turkey 🇹🇷 think that what the Turkish government is really trying to do, is to extract concessions from the U.S. e.g. on F-16s
U.S. government 🇺🇸 is not interested for the moment in injecting itself in resolving this situation. U.S.-Turkey relations are at a low point, and it’s not clear if the Biden administration could even deliver a carrot for Turkey, given sour the mood in Congress.
#NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg and his private office are deeply involved in mediating, but so far there are very few signs of progress
In Turkey, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is seen as a regional conflict, rather than a challenge to the European security system. Therefore the #NATO#Madrid summit is seen as an opportunity for a transactional gain, rather than a key moment for transatlantic unity.
💡Perhaps a country that has good relations with Turkey 🇹🇷, who will strongly benefit in security terms from 🇸🇪&🇫🇮 joining NATO, and can closely consult with the 🇺🇸, could play a helpful role in this stalemate - #Poland🇵🇱? @JakubKumoch@RauZbigniew
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s a good idea to provide Ukraine 🇺🇦 with #MiG-29 fighters - they will limit Russia 🇷🇺 bombing innocent civilians.
The decision should not be made in #Warsaw alone - the responsibility lies with #NATO as a whole.
What would it take to get Ukraine those #MIGs? Short 🧵
(1/8)
Supplying Ukraine with #Mig29 will likely be seen by Russia as a significant step up in military help for Ukraine. Russia threatened unspecified retaliation. No one NATO country should be put under pressure to do it alone.
It shouldn't be matter for only bilateral 🇵🇱🇺🇸 conv.
In order to do it well, we need to do it together - as #NATO. All Allies should be heard, and all Allies should stand behind this decision.
(3/8)
🧵I’m both heartened and worried after just coming back from #Kyiv 🇺🇦, where @gmfus@ua_boell delegation, which I had a honor to lead, meet with key government officials, opposition, think tanks, and civil society. Here are few observations from the past days 👇
There is ZERO desire among Ukrainians to give in to Russian demands. They are determined and defiant. I don’t know what Putin is thinking, but the Ukrainian people are not going to accept a Moscow puppet government in Kyiv. If Putin’s decide to attack, Ukraine will make him pay.
Ukraine will fight, if need be. They don’t expect the West to do it for them - but they rightly expect help - both politically and when it comes to #weapons. Frustration with the #West in #Kyiv varies from moderate to extremely high.
🧵U.S. messaging following the Biden-Putin call is back on track. President Biden’s good phone calls with President Zelenskyy 🇺🇦 and leaders of the Bucharest Nine Eastern Flank NATO Allies went a long way to clarify U.S. position on key principles, formats and next steps👇
In a phone call with President Zelenskyy, Biden made clear his commitment to a principle “no decisions or discussions about Ukraine without Ukraine.” whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
In a phone call with Bucharest Nine leaders, Biden stressed the U.S. commitment to consultation with ALL Transatlantic Allies and partners - In fact, excluding the previously floated format of 🇺🇸+4+🇷🇺 consultations. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
🧵President Biden’s statement yesterday about his video meeting with #Putin👇 seemed like a departure from the past weeks of Alliance-focused diplomacy and created very real concerns on #NATO eastern flank. There is number of questions that should be clarified by the U.S. admin:
President Biden spoke of a meeting on Friday that would “discuss the future of Russia’s concerns relative to NATO writ large and whether or not we can work out any accommodations”. • What accommodations could be worked out with Russia that threatens Ukraine with armed invasion?
• Are there Russia’s “concerns relative to #NATO” that the U.S. finds legitimate?
🧵Few observations from #Riga after talking with several senior officials from across the Alliance at the #NATO#ForMin meeting:
• the scale of Russian military build up is unprecedented - this is NOT a repeat of the spring built up. The talk of war in Ukraine is in the air.
• Russia’s ultimate intentions are not clear - but the scale and capabilities that are being prepared would allow it to strike Ukraine from three directions, perhaps including from the north through Belarus.
• The broader strategic community, including think tanks, for the moment deeply underestimates the severity of the situation due to classification of the specific information presented to the Allies.