Matt Cameron Profile picture
Jun 13 5 tweets 3 min read
LAST WEEK: Thomas writes for 6-3 #SCOTUS majority holding that you can't sue #CBP for violations of individual rights.

TODAY: Alito writes for 6-3 majority holding that ICE/CBP detainees can't sue as a class to challenge systemic violations of their rights.

#ExpandTheCourt Caption for Garland v. Gonzalez, Supreme Court No. 20-322 de
Although specifically reviewing class actions by detainees, this decision would appear to bar most injunctive class actions against immigration authorities. Pls read Sotomayor's summary in her dissent of the enormous burden #SCOTUS has just placed on immigrants & advocates Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor's summary in her disseExcerpt from Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent in Garland v.
the Biden admin pushed for MUCH WORSE

"[T]he Court rightly does not embrace the Govt's 11th-hour suggestion... to hold that [the INA] bars even classwide declaratory relief, [which] would leave many noncitizens with no practical remedy whatsoever against clear violations..."
You read that right: Biden's lawyers were trying to argue that this applied to essentially ALL attempts for immigrants to sue the government for collective violations of their rights--a position apparently BEYOND what the Trump admin was willing to take. I need a walk.
where's that endless scream account when you need it?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Cameron

Matt Cameron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matt_cam

Jun 9
1/ NEVER FORGET that hrs before #January6th, Trump initiated the designation of an imagined domestic enemy he called "Antifa" as a criminal terrorist organization & gave DHS broad powers to enforce against suspected non-citizen members & supporters.

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-a…
2/ This order came to mind this morning as I continued to consider the implications of yesterday's #SCOTUS decision immunizing #CBP and #ICE from judicial accountability for abuses of power against ordinary people. Let me tell you where this goes.

3/ The order confirmed that DOJ had already collected enough evidence to deem "Antifa" (which is, again, not an actual thing) a domestic terror organization and recommended that State add them to 2 different lists: (1) "criminal organizations" and (2)"terrorist organizations"
Read 12 tweets
Jun 8
1/Writing for a 6-3 majority today, #SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas just ended your well-established right to sue federal law enforcement agents not only for violent abuses of power, but any ensuing acts of retaliation against you for reporting them. We need to talk about this.
2/ Thomas is already the most regressive justice in our lifetimes, consistently comforting the comfortable and giving voice to the already-extremely-well-voiced: cops, bosses, Gitmo jailers, etc. As of today we can add violent border agents to the list.
3/ Today's case involves a guy who lives ON the Canadian border who publicly held himself out as a smuggler, ran a B&B called "Smuggler's Inn," & literally smuggled people in a vehicle with "SMUGLER" vanity plates. He was also a well-paid federal snitch, because of course he was
Read 14 tweets
Jun 1
TFW you've reached a joint agreement with DHS in a difficult detained case which gets your client the best possible outcome under the circumstances only to have a Trump-appointed immigration judge a time zone away reject that joint agreement using the wrong legal standard
FYI for non-lawyers: it is rare for a judge to decline to accept *any* joint agreement brought to the court in good faith by the parties involved
IJ: Counsel, do you reserve appeal?
ME: Yes
JUDGE: well I hope that doesn't keep him in custody at govt expense too much longer
*angry pause*
ME: I have to say that everyone here was hoping we'd reached a solution which would save the govt the trouble
IJ: that's out of my hands
Read 6 tweets
May 27
Mass violence is a rational response to beliefs that:

-Latino immigrants are "invaders" (El Paso)
-a race war will preserve white supremacy (Charleston)
-Muslims are the enemy (Christchurch)
-Jews support refugees to "replace" whites (Pittsburgh)
-women owe you sex (Isla Vista)
-"antifa" threaten white supremacy (Charlestown)
-Norway's leftist party presents an existential threat so great that its next generation must be exterminated (Utoya)
-publishing cartoons of your prophet is blasphemy (Charlie Hebdo)
-white genocide is in progress (Buffalo)
Other than correctly assessing that to be antifascist is to stand against white supremacy, these beliefs are not reasonable, respectable, or objectively correct.

But they are subjectively rational, and hundreds of millions of ppl around the world hold them
Read 8 tweets
May 27
My favorite question to ask my fellow citizens whose brains remain blissfully uncooked by The Law is who the president was when the Supreme Court held there is an individual Constitutional right to own a gun in all states.

No one has ever correctly guessed it was Barack Obama.
Heller (the subject of the linked thread) came out in June '08, a month after "Iron Man" and six months before Obama was elected.

Two years later McDonald doubled down and applied that right to the states.
Most people guess Adams, Jackson, or some other 19th century president, which only makes the well-known fact that the NRA was desperately afraid to bring this question to the court and actively tried to stop the lawyer who did in 2008 that much more incredible
Read 4 tweets
May 19
1/This thread on an obscure committee nominally responsible for directing a beloved #EastBoston park is this week's essential #bospoli reading. Meet me back here when you're done for a few more thoughts from someone who has been following this fiasco closely for the past 10 yrs
2/ For context, here's the finished portion of Piers Park. I live around the corner, walk past it every day, and visit as often as possible. It"s a treasure, one of New England's beautiful spaces. The angry racists you've just seen in those videos are tasked with managing it.
3/ Piers Park is an amazing place for working people of limited means to have parties, get married, shoot music videos, take family photos, and hear great music. Like my band, @hightiderocks! Here we are playing some Dead on Jerry Garcia's birthday

Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(