A 🧵 about a few Facts and Dates proving the lawsuit 🆚 @Ripple & #XRP was a weapon:

1) In 2103 @chrislarsensf gives a presentation to regulators including the @SECGov,
@federalreserve, #FinCEN, etc, discussing his plan to utilize the #XRPL and how he intends to distribute #XRP;
2) Two years after that meeting, in 2015, FinCEN & DOJ enter into a settlement w/ Ripple declaring #XRP a “convertible virtual currency” and force Ripple to register #XRP sales w/ FinCEN - NOT the SEC - (the SEC is made aware of the deal and its terms pursuant to info sharing);
3) On June 13, 2018 SEC Enforcement Lawyers write ✍️ a legal memo 📝 analyzing #XRP under Howey and these enforcement lawyers DO NOT conclude #XRP is a security and it SO NOT recommend an enforcement action or a cease and desist letter against Ripple;
4) On June 14, 2018 Hinman gives his speech on decentralized networks and says present day sales of #ETH are not securities thus suggesting, any network that is as decentralized or more decentralized than #Ether, the SEC will NOT consider the token a security;
5) In August 2018 @JoelKatz and @bgarlinghouse meet w/ Hinman and Clayton seeking regulatory clarity regarding #XRP and Garlinghouse complained that Ripple was living in purgatory over a lack of clarity. Neither Clayton nor Hinman respond or inform him that #XRP is a security;
6) In September 2018 Garlinghouse meets w/ SEC Commissioner Elad Roisman over the lack of clarity and Elad says “I apologize you’re even here” or words to that effect and Garlinghouse leaves the meeting feeling more positive about the SEC’s view over #XRP’s regulatory status;
7) In January 2019 @coinbase w/ its very experienced sophisticated securities lawyers meet w/ Hinman and the SEC and inform the SEC that Coinbase has run #XRP through its security framework and concluded today’s #XRP is not a security and plan to list #XRP immediately;
This #XRP meeting w/ the SEC was very important to Coinbase b/c it intended to file for an IPO and go public and obviously couldn’t do so while selling an unregistered security;
8) Hinman and the SEC did not dispute Coinbase’s conclusion that today’s #XRP is NOT a security and Coinbase listed #XRP in February 2019 and was allowed to go public with its IPO while listing #XRP;
9) On June 17, 2019 Ripple filed a NOTICE w/ the SEC stating:

“This agreement will enable @MoneyGram to utilize Ripple’s xRapid product (#XRP) in foreign exchange settlement as part of the MoneyGram’s cross-border payment process.”

See 👇

sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
That’s right:

Ripple gave the SEC written notice that Ripple was planning to distribute the same token (#XRP) that the SEC enforcement lawyers analyzed ONE YEAR PRIOR to the MoneyGram deal. The SEC did nothing, just like they did nothing to counter Coinbase’s listing of #XRP;
10) On January 1, 2020, Bailard Inc, filed an Ethics Disclosure w/ the SEC making assurances and guarantees to the SEC that the only cryptocurrencies Bailard or its affiliates would trade or hold would be the ones the SEC and the market consider non-securities: #BTC, #ETH & #XRP;
11) The first time the SEC informed Ripple it believed #XRP was a security was a few months before filing the lawsuit in December 2020 (after multiple meetings in years prior, including 2 months after the #XRP memo was written);
12) On December 17, 2020, Joseph Grundfest wrote to Clayton @HesterPeirce @SECHerrenLee and the other commissioners and all senior SEC officials pleading w/ them to not bring a suit alleging #XRP is a security b/c innocent holders would be financially devastated and harmed.
Grundfest who served as a liaison between the SEC and @ethereumJoseph @VitalikButerin @stevennerayoff made clear that there was no material distinction between #ETH and #XRP and by suing #XRP it called into question the SEC’s true motive behind filing the lawsuit.
Grundfest said the mass exodus of SEC leadership who pushed the lawsuit but was immediately leaving raised “obvious concerns” and he said if you file the case, the exchanges will be compelled to delist #XRP, despite trading it for almost 8 years;

See👇
crypto-law.us/wp-content/upl…
13) On Dec. 22, 2020, Clayton’s last full day at the SEC, the SEC files a lawsuit against Ripple. And even though there isn’t one single count of Fraud, the SEC takes the unusual step of suing the individual executives.
But the SEC doesn’t limit it’s allegations to only include sales offered by Ripple or it’s executives - the SEC claims every sale of #XRP from 2013 until today made BY ANYONE, including exchanges and retail holders are all sales of unregistered securities. 👇
Astonishingly, the SEC now claims that the #XRP Ripple transferred to MoneyGram after telling the SEC about it, were also illegal. Moreover, when MoneyGram turned around and sold that #XRP to retail holders, it too was illegal.

Everything Grundfest warned came true;
14) We learn that Clayton told @a16z’s Chris Dixon to assemble a working group and write ✍️ up a proposal. Dixon looks to Lowell Ness from Perkins Coie (PC) - who has worked for #a16z from the beginning. PC is a member of the #EEA. These #a16z lawyers write up a Safe Harbor.
Since PC is a member of the #EEA which ONLY promotes #ETH, it isn’t a surprise #ETH is the only token mentioned in the Safe Harbor. These Lawyers meet w/ Hinman.

15) Hinman didn’t receive a retirement pension from Simpson Thacher (STB)- he was an ongoing profit sharing partner.
Hinman collected $15M while at the SEC from his law firm - a member of the EEA. Hinman was told by the SEC Ethics Office he was under a criminal conflict bar from having ANY contact with STB - he violated it 3 more times after being told. Hinman returns to STB (he never left);👇
After agreeing to give #ETH a free pass to the investors at a16z - Hinman becomes a partner w/ - WAIT FOR IT - the investors at a16z;

Clayton’s former law partners from Sullivan&Cromwell (SC) went to work at @ConsenSys. SC represented Consensys and brokered the JPM Quorum deal
16) JPM Coin was direct competition w/Ripple & #XRP. The deal w/ Consensys was Aug. 2020 (4 months before lawsuit).

17) Clayton voted to bring an action 🆚 his law firm’s client’s biggest competitor and voted 🆚 fellow Republican commissioners (per @CGasparino @EleanorTerrett);
18) One River bet $1B on #Bitcoin and #ETH in October 2020 - 2 months before the lawsuit. Clayton goes to One River w/in weeks of leaving SEC.

18) Marc Berger, the Enforcement Director, who helped write the absurd over-broad complaint, goes to STB w/ Hinman.

Timeline facts👇
The SEC seeks $1.3B from Ripple and the two executives. But Ripple co-founder @JedMcCaleb has sold over $2B worth of #XRP SINCE THE LAWSUIT WAS FILED. Also, Ripple continues to sell #XRP.
In fact, when Ripple objected to costly discovery (costing several hundred thousand dollars) the SEC told the judge Ripple should sell #XRP to fund it. The SEC literally recommended and encouraged Ripple to sell #XRP while claiming those sales are illegal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John E Deaton (204K Followers Beware Imposters)

John E Deaton (204K Followers Beware Imposters) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnEDeaton1

Jun 13
“My sense is that #XRP’s value is derived from enterprise profits resulting from the works of others. Howey wowie!”

- @andykessler of the @WSJ.

Andy, I represent 67,800 #XRPHolders from the U.S. and 60 other countries from around the 🌎
I’ve also been granted amici curiae status on behalf of #XRPHolders by Judge Torres in the @SECGov 🆚 @Ripple case.

Respectfully, what forms the basis or foundation underlying your “sense” that #XRPHolders are relying on the efforts of Ripple?
For example, are you aware the majority of first time purchasers of #XRP were completely unaware of a company called Ripple and its use of #XRP?

It is is quite difficult to rely on the promises and the efforts of a company you are completely unaware exists, don’t you agree?
Read 18 tweets
Jun 12
THE SEC STRIKES AGAIN 🆚 CRYPTO AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY

“In the final hours before the statute of limitations would expire, on April 27, 2022, the SEC sent a letter to The Dragonchain Foundation, Dragonchain, Inc., The Dragon Company, and Joe Roets, notifying the parties
that investigators would recommend to the Commissioners to charge the parties with the sale of unregistered securities in 2017. As you all know, we’ve been communicating with the SEC for over four long years now, and we’ve been fully transparent, providing numerous answers and
copious amounts of data, however, we’ve never been given the opportunity within the regulatory process to offer a full philosophical reasoning for the DRGN Tokenized Micro-License or technology related. We’ve never had an opportunity to present the case that the DRGN is a
Read 7 tweets
Jun 11
EVERYONE IN crypto should read footnote 5 below.

In October 2013 @chrislarsensf met w/ various regulators to give a presentation at the U.S. Treasury Dep’t sharing w/ them @Ripple’s vision “for a global payments system and cross border payments based on blockchain technology.”
At this meeting, Ripple provided these regulators w/ a slide deck. The slides INFORMED REGULATORS that Ripple’s was actively engaged in a “distribution of #XRP on-going.”

In short, in 2013, SEVEN years BEFORE the lawsuit was filed, Ripple ratted on themselves to the U.S. Gov’t.
Who was at this meeting wherein Ripple disclosed and admitted to on-going sales of #XRP?

Here’s the list:

Not only was @SECGov at the meeting, but so was:
@USTreasury; @federalreserve; @FDICgov; @TheNCUA; @CFPB; @IRSnews; #CSBS; @FTC; @StateINL; #FinCEN; #OFAC; and the @FBI.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 10
At Consensus and listening to @ethereumJoseph answer questions. The moderator is from @novogratz’s Galaxy Digital. Clearly, they are paying attention to Twitter and the claims of token concentration and the disguised whales as they move to PoS.
Joe Lubin was asked about the comment by @GaryGensler that Joe owned 10% of #Ether from the Genesis Block and was asked if he would disclose how much #ETH he & @ConsenSys owns. Joe declined providing his or Consensys’ holdings, but did say it’s never been close to 1/2 of 1%.
Three other interesting comments: 1) Joe claims he hasn’t accumulated any more #ETH since the Genesis Block but Consensys is accumulating leading up to the Merge;
Read 4 tweets
Jun 8
Bruce, maybe you have the time to spend on Twitter and count how many times someone is tagged. If I was tagged 10K times w/in the last week it wouldn’t change my availability. Quit acting like people are scared to engage or debate you based on your immediate timetable.

1/9
2/9

I actually have no idea what you want to talk about or debate. Is it whether today’s #XRP is a security? If so, I have written detailed 🧵s laying out my analysis on why it isn’t. Is it whether the #XRPL is centralized or decentralized? I’ve put out 🧵s on that as well?
3/9

Is it challenging my claim that Hinman violated criminal conflict laws or Title 5? I’ve laid that out in detail. Is it regarding the #Ether Free pass and the time line I’ve challenged anyone to dispute?
Read 9 tweets
Jun 8
I understand and people have asked me why I didn’t address it in my letter, filed this morning. My letter to the Judge this morning points out to the Court that I followed the rules exactly and that I should be allowed an opportunity to file a reply to the SEC’s opposition.
It is a bit confusing and the SEC may honestly be mistaken or they assumed I wasn’t paying attention to the rules, considering I don’t practice in the SDNY. Either way, the judge will decide. My letter is 👇. Image
The reason I didn’t address the motion to seal and the request asking the Court to order me not to discuss the Opposition Brief to anyone, is because I haven’t seen or read the Opposition Brief. I don’t know how serious or not serious the issue is.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(