Ancient Iranian Devices, Insignia & Monograms
نشان های کهن ایرانی
One of the most enigmatic, least studied aspects of #Iranian history & culture
Check this thread out to find out more, and please #retweet & share. You won't find all this info elsewhere!
🧵⤵️⚡️
I might one day turn this into a paper. But for now, let's look at this really cool part of our history! I am so excited!!
What I will call "devices" are abstract signs, seals... that got progressively more complex by end of #Sasanian era. They are also called #Tamga (or tamgha)
Tamga from Turkish. In Middle Persian and modern Persian, the word would be Nishaan or Neshaan ( Ossetian gakk)
These have an amazing and long history. They might have started as signs for cattle, later for clans & families. Were used by people across Eurasia
Many of the signs are similar or were used later too. But we have to pay particular attention to differences, as one line or simple change could mean it is a different clan or individual's device
We can start with some signs from satraps in #Achaemenid era
As I mentioned, many other people across Eurasia also used these signs
Now moving to #Parthian / Arsacid period, again we have what appear to be personal devices, more so in Indo-European sphere, Elymais which was ancient Elamite, and some other regions.
These are generally Parthian symbols on coins, many from Greek inspiration or Greek letters
I've done a great deal of research on this and lost some sleep just because of how excited I've been 😅 Couldn't wait to share it!
1) #Ardashir I, and by extension Sasanian dynasty's clan sign
We first encounter this device on the "Battle of Hormozdgan" relief at Firuzabad, showing Ardashir I's victory over Artabanus IV and his forces
Later on this sign was added to various Sasanian kings' coins. As Sergey Aleksandrovich Yatsenko hypotheses and I agree, it cannot mean
anything else at that point but the dynastic sign of the Sasanians, at least one of them, together with Shapur I's device also on later Sasanian coins. We'll look at that soon
What are the origins and meanings of this sign?
There are at least 4 hypotheses:
A) Simplification of ring of power with ribbons, as best seen here, @ Firuzabad & Naghshe Rajab
B) Some relation to Egyptian #Ankh, possibly via earlier adoption in Near East
C) As a simplification of Fravahar sign
D) My own addition: possibly from a local, nearby or Parthian sign, especially see Meredates of Characene
E) I wholly reject Abolala Soudavar's idea that this is "child sign" and a ref to Apam-Napāt (see "The Vocabulary and Syntax of Iconography in Sasanian Iran", 2009)
Most likely one of other options, possibly reused sign that was in existence before Sasanian era too
We then see this same sign adopted as the clan device of Sasanians and multiple kings have it on reverse of coins, even sometimes on their head
Other Sasanian kings adopting Ardashir's device (sometimes called double legged Ankh or Fravahar device)
این نشان #اردشیر بابکان است که بعد چندین شاه ساسانی به سکه های خود هم اضافه کردند به عنوان نشان خاندان ساسانی.
Now I should add that generally in reliefs etc. these devices were added for identification. So the reason it was added to Firuzabad victory scene was b/c Ardashir was not wearing his regular crown ... to be identified
Also I should note I have never seen this device
as such used by any priest (mobed), any other Sasanian person or clan. It is unique for Ardashir I and his family.
I have looked at hundreds of seals etc. The closest is this one in Netherlands
I have also found some Sasanian era items that have this sign on them. Does that mean these were royal objects? Used by royal family at some point in Sasanian era? Not sure
This is a cosmetic container
sold at Christie's in 2001, now appears in Rome. I think it's the same one. Has the device repeated 4 times on lid. Placement of animals is odd on the device, but otherwise this is very cool!
This one is a weight (identified as such), I believe @MuseeLouvre
This I would call a very, very important find. I'm not sure what it would signify if anything, or if the sign is there by chance. I doubt it.
It is a representation of a castle/palace + the sign in front. Found in #Georgia recently. I could not translate the paper, it's online
And finally 2 doubtful, odd-looking things
1: @britishmuseum , possibly a variation of a device
2: @metmuseum , identified as glass doll. Otherwise without parallel. Possible, but unlikely
Finally moving alll the way towards the end of #Sasanian era and Taqe Bostan, we have relief of Khosrow II with same device on horse
Again it makes sense b/c he is not wearing a crown just like Ardashir, and for identification we see the royal device on the horse
Also apparently repeated at the site, though I haven't seen other photos of where that is (see Niccolò Manassero's paper available online, Tamgas, a Code of the Steppes)
2) Shapur I's device, also a dynastic Sasanian device repeated on later coins (see above in thread)
Again the story begins at Firuzabad where we see this sign.
Later it's also repeated a couple of times elsewhere
2: possibly the same symbol on this Sasanian drinking vessel
این نشان #شاپور یکم است, و این رو هم شاهان ساسانی به عنوان نشان خاندانی استفاده میکردند.
It could be depicting the sun and moon, or phases of the moon.
Note a similar Indo-Parthian device I mentioned. But it is NOT the same. The lines above are not circular to indicate a crescent like Shapur's device
To be continued! :)
⤵️
The situation gets complex because a symbol could be both a clan symbol, then with some changes and additions become a personal one.
Some symbols were also used for flags, banners and so on,
Related to our topic, I should briefly mention that the 3 dots we see on coins and other ancient Iranian artefacts is usually considered a symbol of #Tishtrya, divinity in Zoroastrianism.
1-2: Another triskele or triskelion-like or World Triad device, @ Sackler
3: @britishmuseum : this one is really cool. It actually has 2 devices on it, a more complex one beside the hand!
⤵️
We see the same design on coin of some king of Persis!
1: Pakor
2: Uncertain king
And there could be some connection with triskele and Greco-Roman triskelion as well, though with obvious differences when it comes to Greco-Roman symbol
1: Greek silver stater from Aspendos, Pamphylia (4th century BC)
2: Iron Age Castro culture triskele
3: Rainbow cup-Celtic
1: Silver Drachma from Sicily, minted during the reign of Agathocles (361–289 BC)
2: Trisquel de Castromao
3: another possible connection: Gankyil Symbol in Buddhism
I find it interesting these 2 devices are somewhat similar!
⤵️
6) Possibly Papak, Vizier/minister of Bahram II
Photo 3 shows device on headwear. I'm doubtful about 1-2 b/c what person is holding is likely flower. I've seen that on seals, other places
In any event, this person appears together with Kartir on same relief
To be continued
⤵️
7) Possibly Yazdgerd I (یزدگرد یکم) based on a coin at BM
Note again that these devices were generally not used on gold coins, on coins where king's crown was clearly visible. They were instead used on pashiz, less valuable and poorly made coins like this one
8) Unidentified clan or personal symbol of a noble person
9) Foe on Hormizd II's Relief
NOTE this has been erroneously identified with potential device of Papak. This one is different*
It has additional details below the device, and is of a foe/enemy of Hormizd II
10) Crescent and sun as device on hat of another noble person, unidentified
Note it gets interesting b/c crescent and sun or star was also used as a banner/standard, and on some Sasanian kings' crowns etc. So we see use of similar or same symbol in various contexts
11) Possible personal devices of some Sasanian kings on some coins (photo 2)
Also compare again with use of Ardashir I and Shapur I's devices as dynastic devices on later #Sasanian coins (photo 1)
⤵️
And see this Sasanian silver container with multiple devices on it, some of which we talked about before
⤵️
Now these were just the simpler devices! Numerous clans, families, individuals then would have very elaborate designs with endless possibilities
این نشانهایی رو که تا حالا دیدیم ساده تر بودن. خاندان ها و اشخاص نشانهای بسیار پر نقش و نگارهم استفاده میکردن.
It's not always easy to identify these.
Some can be considered "monograms", perhaps of 3 general types: stylized device, pure letter device, complex mixed ones
Only seals with inscriptions could really be compared with letters or symbols of monograms to decipher them
There is sometimes disagreement in reading & deciphering of these complex devices, and I'm only providing a few examples! There are hundreds if not thousands around the world!
See for example this reading of complex monogram
⤵️
Such complex devices & insignia must have been highly prized. "Seals bearing them were probably used by numerous members, dependants, servants of a given clan or estate, resulting in many duplicates."
"At the same time, merchants, clergy, officials, etc., of middle classes
were employing the animal and other motifs [simpler ones] as personal emblems. It is, in fact, animal devices which the #Shahnameh chiefly recalls. The continual association of name and device in the epic is noteworthy. e.g., 'I do not know him by his name and device'
'Whose was the name and device of this letter?' etc.
So Shahnameh is once again very important in understanding the usage and some social aspects of use of devices, e.g., "when Khosrow asked [the merchant] his name and device... he told Khosrow his device directly" [Sasanian
Stamp Seals in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Brunner]: see this publication available freely online for details of numerous complex monograms and devices*
See these examples
⤵️
Also these
1: @britishmuseum , Perozhormizd, son of the Kanarang, and NOT Hormizd the king as sometimes wrongly identified
So these personal identity marks, devices, insignia, have a long history in Eurasia, including in #Iran.
"Heraldic insignia as the coats of arms of the European aristocracy are still in use today" [See Tamgas, a Code of the Steppes, Niccolò Manassero, 2013]
"in human societies the reminders about identity and ownership may be expressed mainly by physical or visual means and by linguistic means, namely by marks and words."
"Just like advertising marks, identity marks always had to be clearly identifiable"
But "the appearance of Iranian tamgas is seldom plain and geometrical as is that of the advertising brands: rather, tamgas are often complicated, asymmetrical and unclear, thus giving rise to many different hypotheses about their meaning and origins."
"Both writing and tamgas were developed for the same needs, namely for accounting. They are two different responses, or rather two different steps of the same response to the demand for adequate social rules to regulate and guarantee personal properties." [(Cf. Gelb 1968, p. 36]
"Tamgas arise in social milieus where written communication is absent, where information is con- veyed through spoken language or through visual and physical means."
Note from an academic perspective, I find this another important indication of lack of importance placed
in ancient Iranian society, especially in earlier stages, on writing everything down.
We see evidence (or lack of evidence) of this in Parthian society with Gosans (minstrels) which were (are?) still a part of #Armenian society and culture, among many other signs.
It's also important to separate Nishans from Monograms : "Monograms were specifically created within a social order regulated by institutions not relying on blood-relationship. In contrast, tamgas belong to small social orders based on blood-relationship."
"monograms are marks expressing identity by an individual: they are in effect signatures... On contrary, tamgas are marks expressing identity & ownership by a clan, a group of relatives."
So it might be difficult to identify monograms on seals... compared to devices @rasoulipour
"Later Sasanian devices show an increasing tendency to absorb monographic elements; this trend paralleled the freer use of abbreviations generally.” In other words, “Sasanian monograms” were actually tamgas. But in late Sasanian age, some engravers began to adapt
Pahlavi letters to the layout of those tamgas, likely for aesthetic reasons and as an intellectual game — that is, for the same reasons that might have led Greek mint- ers to create monograms as signatures on coins." [Niccolò Manassero]
Also see numerous papers by Sergey Aleksandrovich Yatsenko, including Nishan-Signs of the Aristocracy of Sasanian Iran / Знаки-нишан аристократии сасанидского Ирана . Moscow, 2021: available online.
In any event, if we want to have a project identifying Sasanian Nishans, we need to separate personal marks (with some monographic elements) from clan ones
Also note the Nishan of last king of Parthian empire is more likely a "family crest", at least one of them for #Arsacids
"#Artabanus IV, is identified at Firuzabad by a tamga composed by a ring on the top of a vertical
staff. This mark, which first appeared under Orodes II and was depicted on both obverses and reverses of Parthian coins, is a “sort of family crest” and is usually called
“the Arsacid symbol” by scholars (see Grabowski 2011, p. 220; Sinisi 2012, p. 64) [Niccolò Manassero]
2 other possible Parthian era precursors or connections to Ardashir I's and Sasanian royal house's device/ Nishan
1: Parthian era Elymais, Phraates (from Parthia website online)
2: Significant archeological find at Mele Hairam by Prof. Barbara Kaim and colleagues
Again, like other devices these could have been independently used for generations and one is not necessarily derived from the other
These are identified as pawns, available online, see ALT text
Also I share this categorization of royal Sasanian devices, though not sure if it's wholly accurate
I do not think Hormizd II's device is identified correctly. That seems to be for another individual from their seal, as shared earlier in thread, but see e.g., Yazdgerd II's coin
Significant Addendum:
I have found 3 Ardashir I coins now, which have what has been labeled "tamga" or "Frawahr" symbol on headwear or shoulders. We can't make out the full symbol, but it does appear to have replaced the place of usual star on head
These are exceedingly rare!
2 are from trusted sources, British Museum & American Numismatic Society.
Also see this apparent seal with same or similar device. I can't find original location, possibly Austria: from Sylloge Nummorum Sasanidarum
Finally see Parthika at fr website for a page on anchor symbol also on some Parthian coins, and a little more on 3 devices I talked about: link in ALT text so it doesn't get blocked!
2 more examples:
A Triskelion on a coin (photo 2) minted at city of Aspendos, counter-marked, found in Persepolis
1: Achaemenid era seal with Triskelion-like design
1: Clearer view of Ardashir I's device on his crown
2: Also on crown of Shapur I
See ALT text for Princeton U Library links. Only coin I've seen of Ardashir I with clear image of his device!! REALLY COOL!
I was able to track down this important seal: in Saeedi Collection
Published 2003 by Rika Gyselen in “Dīwān et «Trésorerie» sassanides: premières attestations sigillographiques”
2: To the left, seal of a dīwān; To the right, seal of the royal Treasury
MP legend around perimeter reads “Seal of the Treasury which is in good increase” (Middle Persian: muhr ī ganj ī pad abzōn wēh). Here symbol is called frawahr. "It appears in many fields closely related with the House of Sāsān (rock reliefs, coins, etc.)"
⤵️
In Gyselen’s opinion, presence of symbol must hint towards royal status for this “Treasury” [original article in French]
این مهر در کلکسیون سعیدی هست. مهر خزانه سلطنتی دوره ساسانی است. نشان رو اینجا "فروهر" نامیده اند, که همون نشان خاندان ساسانی است.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Please forgive me, but I'm getting excited here... I may have connected some dots that were left unconnected before...
1: In "Ardashir and the Sasanians' Rise to Power" by Dr. @tourajdaryaee & "ReOrienting the Sasanians" by Dr. @sasanianshah I did not see these connections.
2: For some reason various sources note the name of a "Indo-Parthian" ruler as "Sasan", for example ...
in "Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art":
and "The interrelation between Indo-Parthian and Kushan chronology", 1992. This second article seems to provide some clues:
Achaemenid Royal Audience Scene, inside shield of Persian soldier on so-called 'Alexander Sarcophagus'
4th C BCE, from Sidon, @ Istanbul Archaeology Museums, Photos: Fluorescent UV & Reconstruction
⤵️
An older drawing without some of the details (1);
There are parallels, precedents to #Achaemenid royal scenes in Assyrian, Elamite, other Near Eastern art. Drawing in photo 2 for example is likely of an older, Elamite seal which continued to be used in Achaemenid court
⤵️
We see examples of this royal audience scene @ Persepolis, here reconstructed from the fuller image @ Apadana, and another modern recreation @ Zinat al-Molk House