Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Jul 22 6 tweets 3 min read
In key #January6thHearing testimony, Joint Chiefs Chair Milley:

"No Call? Nothing? Zero?" from Trump to DoD.

But ask yourself: why didn't DoD call Trump?

@justinhendrix and my take on most plausible theory: DoD fear Trump use military to hold onto power
justsecurity.org/79623/crisis-o…
2. Our analysis was in Dec 21 (addressing larger question what explained National Guard delay).

New reporting (@MarkMazzettiNYT @maggieNYT) is consistent with our analysis, though implicitly points to DoD concerns of "optics" more than actual use of Guard
nytimes.com/2022/07/21/us/…
3. Nugget in NYT backs up Miller's earlier testimony:

"The president did tell advisers in the days before Jan. 6, 2021, that he wanted a National Guard presence, BUT it appeared he wanted the troops as extra protection for his supporters, his aides have privately acknowledged."
4. That undercuts one of Trump's main defenses.

He claimed he wanted Guard in advance to protect the peace.

Not true. He wanted Guard to protect his supporters.

And fact he wanted larger Guard presence is indication he quite fully anticipated violence, the powder keg.
5. NYT is correct: "numerous government investigations have established that law enforcement agencies gravely misjudged the threat."

But not so for DoD.

Miller/Milley:
called Jan 4 Cabinet meeting
raised concern of militias, Proud Boys
proposed rescinding Capitol rally permits
6/6. Finally,

Miller interview: Miller "insisted" he "neither tried nor needed to contact the president on January 6."
vanityfair.com/news/2021/01/e…

Miller testimony: "in regard to the President’s involvement in the response. [Trump] had none" with the DoD efforts on Jan. 6.

<end>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

Jul 19
I asked experts if Dominion Voting Systems could now sue Trump.

Backdrop: #January6thHearings revealed Trump was well informed that accusations were false.

Upshot: Makes for a powerful case of #Defamation.

Could sue for over a billion $$.

<thread>
justsecurity.org/82447/8-top-ex…
2. First Amendment living legend, Floyd Abrams:

“Dominion would have an extremely powerful libel case against him. Statements Trump made about the company were extraordinarily defamatory, provably false and enormously harmful.”

justsecurity.org/82447/8-top-ex…
3. Professor @zahr_said (@UWSchoolofLaw):

“Holding Mr. Trump legally liable for defamation would … provide significant public and institutional censure that could herald a change in our legal system’s apparent tolerance of outright misinformation”

justsecurity.org/82447/8-top-ex…
Read 7 tweets
Jul 17
A warning of profound weaknesses in US national security institutions in wake of authoritarian impulses and USG personnel who fall prey to #disinformation.

Authored by @douglaslondon5 who served in CIA's Clandestine Service for more than 34 years.

justsecurity.org/82360/us-democ…
2. “There are other Michael Flynns and Brad Johnsons still in service across America’s military, intelligence, and law enforcement communities.”
3. “Within the intelligence community, I witnessed the eager politicization to facilitate Trump’s agenda, and it was a key factor driving my retirement.”

Thank you to Doug London for writing this analysis and these reflections.

justsecurity.org/82360/us-democ…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 16
WSJ article says Justice Dept recently expanded #January6th probe thanks to committee's work.

Notes of caution:

1. WSJ says investigation of Trump's "orbit" and "allies." Does not say of Trump as a target.
(NYT report of inaction was keyed into latter.)
wsj.com/articles/justi…
2. Some thought assignment of U.S. Attorney Windom in late 2021 was a sign of expanding probe toward Trump.

But WSJ says: "Windom previously met with some skepticism within the department when he pushed to explore the activities of several members of Mr. Trump’s inner circle."
3. So what has changed at DOJ due to select committee's work?

WSJ says Hutchinson's testimony has "broadened SOME Justice Department officials’ view of the potential scope of the probe ... though officials said the testimony DIDN'T prompt ANY change in investigative strategy."
Read 5 tweets
Jul 12
What a blight on Justice Department.

Clear evidence of potential crimes in

DOJ coup attempt
threats to Georgia officials
pressure on Pence
attack on Capitol

Yet paralysis reigned at highest levels of DOJ. Trump’s name and behavior rarely even mentioned.
nytimes.com/2022/07/11/us/…
2. “Overt discussion of Mr. Trump and his behavior had been rare, except as a motive for the actions of others.”

And what has Hutchinson’s testimony done?

“Jolted” them

Jolted them to take action? To convene a grand jury? To investigate Trump as a target?

No, the answer is…
3. Hutchinson’s “electrifying public testimony … jolted top Justice Department officials into DISCUSSING the topic of Mr. Trump more directly, at times in the presence of Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco.”
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30
This NYT report does not give me great confidence in the speed and depth of Justice Department investigating Trump's efforts.

DOJ blaming #January6thCommittee but ...

(@GlennThrush @lukebroadwater @nytmike report)

<thread>
nytimes.com/2022/06/29/us/…
2. On the left:

Part of the excuse here: "Ms. Hutchinson’s name has not yet appeared on ... court documents ... and she did not seem to be a primary witness before the hearings."

On the right:

The court filing on April 22, 2022 of sign. aspects of Hutchinson's interview.
3. What was known in advance of the June public hearings?

June 4. 2022 @NormEisen said: “Cassidy Hutchinson might turn out to be the next John Dean.”

in interview with @JaxAlemany @jdawsey1 @AmyEGardner
washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 29
A trip down memory lane

Our topic: US Secret Service "denials"

On Jan 3: @maggieNYT reports major scoop: Pence chief of staff Marc Short told VP's lead USSS agent Trump was going to turn publicly against Pence and there could be a security risk to Pence because of it.

<thread>
2. US Secret Service seems to get defensive (mistakenly) thinking this was a criticism of them.

@SecretSvcSpox responds publicly to a tweet by @MilesTaylorUSA issuing what appears to be a denial, until you look more closely at the wording. ...
3. “[T]he Secret Service had no knowledge of that conversation.”

“Had.” Not “has.”
Did he mean had none at the time but very well might have knowledge of it now?

Also “had no knowledge of that conversation” almost admits there was a conversation.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(