Swiss Ramble Profile picture
Jul 29, 2022 27 tweets 22 min read Read on X
In football money often talks, i.e. success on the pitch is almost invariably reserved for clubs that have spent the most on wages and transfer fees. However, it might be interesting to see which clubs have performed the best (and indeed worst) relative to their budget.
This thread will therefore look at how teams in the Premier League in 2021/22 performed relative to their wages, combined wages/player amortisation and squad cost. This is not an exact science, but just a bit of fun, as there are a few caveats to an analysis of this type.
First, I have used financial figures from the most recent published accounts, i.e. from 2020/21, so these are a year out of date compared to 2021/22 league position. Moreover, the last figures available for the 3 promoted clubs are from the Championship, so are under-stated.
In addition, wage bills are for all staff, so include administration, commercial, stewards, etc, as opposed to just the playing squad, Furthermore, player contracts are often highly incentivised, so wages at more successful clubs will be inflated by high bonus payments.
Finally, some clubs changed their accounting date in 2020/21, so their accounts only covered 11 months, mainly because the previous year included 13 months, due to 2019/20 season being extended for COVID delays. In these cases, I have annualised the wages for a fair comparison. Image
Enough caveats, let’s look at some numbers. In 2020/21 four Premier League clubs reported wage bills over £300m, namely #MCFC £355m, #CFC £333m, #MUFC £323m and #LFC £314m. There was then a sizeable gap to #AFC £238m, #THFC £205m, #LCFC £192m and #EFC £183m. Image
Looking at wages per point, the clubs with best value for money were #BHAFC £2.1m, #WHUFC £2.3m, #NUFC £2.4m & Burnley £2.5m. Brentford ae also likely to be one of the best even after their wages increased in PL. In contrast, #MUFC £5.6m, #EFC £4.7m & #CFC £4.5m by far the worst. Image
Another way of ranking clubs’ performance is wages per league position, as this is what really counts (higher merit payment, European qualification, relegation). The way this is calculated is to give 20 points for 1st place, 19th for 2nd, etc, then divide wages by those amounts.
On this basis, the same clubs do best: Brentford, #BHAFC, #WHUFC and #NUFC, though worth noting #THFC impressive performance in 5th place. The three relegated clubs look bad on this metric, but this also highlights underperformance by #LUFC and particularly #EFC. Image
Clubs can also be ranked by comparing final league position with position implied by wage bill, as there is a strong correlation between wages and performance. Here #LFC shine, despite high wages, as they finished 2 places better, but their neighbours #EFC were 8 places worse. Image
However, the wage bill is only one element of squad investment, so for total cost we should also include player amortisation, which is the way that football clubs account for transfer fees.
Basically, football clubs consider players to be assets, so do not fully expense transfer fees in the year a player is purchased, but instead write-off the cost evenly over the length of the player’s contract via player amortisation.
So if a player is purchased for £25m on a 5-year contract, the annual amortisation in the accounts would be £5m, i.e. £25m divided by 5 years. This means that the player’s book value reduces by £5m a year, so after three years his value in the accounts would be £10m. Image
Five Premier League clubs booked more than £100m player amortisation in 2020/21 with #CFC leading the way with £162m, followed by #MCFC £146m, #MUFC £120m, #AFC £117m and #LFC (only) £108m. Worth noting that #EFC £81m was higher than #THFC £74m. ImageImage
Player amortisation is a useful metric, but not perfect for a few reasons: (a) none for players signed on a free transfer; (b) zero for players developed by the Academy; (c) lower if contract length is longer; (d) can be reduced if a player’s contract is extended.
If we look at wages and player amortisation combined, #MCFC were still top of the Premier League with £500m, but #CFC £495m were not far behind. There was then a fair sized gap to #MUFC £443m, #LFC £422m, #AFC £355m and #THFC £279m. ImageImage
Based on wages and player amortisation, Brentford £1.2m and #BHAFC £3.0m again score well on cost per point, though Burnley pop up in 3rd place. What’s maybe more interesting is the high amounts paid for each point by #MUFC £7.6m, #EFC £6.8m and #CFC £6.7m. Image
Again, the addition of player amortisation does not make too much difference to the ranking of clubs in terms of cost per league position, though this is where Burnley did less well. In other words, a club can be frugal, but relegation can sometimes be a high price to pay. Image
It’s much the same story when comparing league position with the amounts paid in wages and player amortisation. Three clubs finished exactly where implied by their finances, namely #MCFC (1st), #AFC (5th) and #CPFC (12th). Image
Finally, we can compare clubs in terms of their squad cost, based on the figures from club accounts (i.e. actual amounts paid including agent fees and signing-on fees), as opposed to the actual market value. These can be very different, e.g. Messi had zero value in Barca’s books. Image
Based on the accounts, two clubs competed with squads costing just under a billion: #MCFC £975m and #CFC £959m. The next highest were #MUFC £861m, #LFC £709m, #AFC £586m and #THFC £481m, though #EFC £451m were not too far behind. Image
Excluding clubs promoted from the Championship, the clubs with the cheapest squad cost per point were Burnley and #BHAFC (both £3.6m), followed by #LUFC £4.4m. Four clubs were higher than £10m: #MUFC £14.8m, #CFC £13.0m, #EFC £11.6m and #MCFC £10.5m. Image
The real stand-out for squad cost per league position is unfortunately #EFC with £90.2m, which is almost exactly six times as much as #BHAFC £15.3m. Last placed #NCFC were worst with £93.5m, but the next highest were #MUFC £57.4m and #CFC £53.3m. Image
In terms of league position against squad cost, the best performing of the “Big Six” were #LFC and #THFC, both 2 places better, while the worst performing were #MUFC, who were 3 places worse. Image
If we add together the rankings of all the metrics we have reviewed, we should have a fairly good idea of which clubs have outperformed , notwithstanding all the health warnings. In this way, we can say that the clubs who get most “bang for their buck” are Brentford and #BHAFC. Image
At the other end of the spectrum,  the worst performing clubs in the Premier League, relative to money spent, were *drum roll* #EFC and #MUFC, though this will surely not come as news to their supporters. Image
Clearly, many fans will say that the only measurement that counts is the number of trophies won by their club, but it is instructive to see which clubs outperform their budget. It looks like the data-driven strategy employed by Brentford and #BHAFC has worked pretty well.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

Sep 16
Review of Manchester United's financial results for the 2023/24 season. As always, #MUFC are the first Premier League club to publish their accounts.

The period included official confirmation of the deal whereby Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a 27.7% stake in United. Image
On the plus side, revenue rose £14m (2%) from £648m to a new club record of £662m, while profit from player sales increased from £20m to £37m, United's best result for 15 years #MUFC
Image
Image
However, the pre-tax loss quadrupled, widening by £98m from £33m to £131m, the second worst in United’s history. Club has posted a loss 5 years in a row, compared to healthy profits in five of the six years up to 2018/19 #MUFC Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 2
A deep dive into this summer's transfer window, focusing on the Premier League, but also looking at the other major leagues. Image
Chelsea had the highest gross transfer spend in the Premier League for the third year in a row, i.e. ever since the Clearlake Capital crew arrived, with a hefty £265m.

Lowest gross spends were at Manchester City £25m and Liverpool £43m.
#CFC #MCFC #LFC Image
However, Chelsea once again had the highest player sales of £186m, followed by Aston Villa £172m and Manchester City £168m.
#CFC #AVFC #MCFC Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 5
As Sunderland prepare for the new season, I took a look at the club's focus on sustainability. How close are they to achieving this and what are the implications for the performance on the pitch? #SAFC Image
The last available accounts from the 2022/23 season are now a full year out of date, but they still offer some indications of how well the strategy is working #SAFC
The bad news is that Sunderland have reported losses 17 years in a row, adding up to a hefty £272m. However, more positively, the club has drastically reduced the size of its losses, averaging less than £7m in the last four years, compared to £20m in the preceding decade #SAFC Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 1
A review of Ipswich Town's finances, as they return to the Premier League after 22 long years away. Focus is on the latest available accounts from 2022/23, but also has comparisons with Championship clubs and some estimates for the top flight #ITFC Image
Losses have been growing under the new owners, as they invested in the squad and infrastructure in an attempt to return Ipswich to former glories - which has clearly worked #ITFC Image
Even though they were in League One, 2022/23 was the first time that the club broke through the £20m revenue barrier since the last time that they were in the Premier League back in 2001/02 #ITFC Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28
An explanation of how the new format for UEFA competitions will work from next season, including an explanation of the revenue distribution. Image
The number of clubs in the Champions League will increase from 32 to 36 with the group stage of 8 groups of 4 teams being replaced by a single league of 36 teams, then a new knockout round, before reverting to the traditional last 16.
Total revenue distribution will increase by 21% from €2.7 bln to €3.5 bln. Lion's share will go to the Champions League €2.5 bln, followed by Europa League €565m and Europa Conference €285m. Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 14
Quick review of the money earned by England's Champions League representatives to date after this week's matches.

#MCFC lead the way with £93m, followed by the other quarter-finalists #AFC £80m. The two clubs eliminated in the group stage earned less: #MUFC £51m and #NUFC £29m. Image
Champions League TV money is split into 4 elements:
- Participation Fee
- Prize Money
- UEFA coefficient
- TV pool Image
Each club that reaches the group stage receives a €15.6m participation fee. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(