This event made many investors wonder whether commonly used investing metrics are manipulable. Chief among them is Total-Value-Locked (TVL), which many investors thought was the key to finding valuable protocols in the DeFi space
Does TVL have any value?
3/ TVL
This metric is meant to represent the Total Value Locked in a protocol that cannot be easily liquidated or moved due to lockup conditions. The higher this metric, the more trust, network effects and positive momentum there is for a project... Or so the theory goes.
4/ Valuating Digital Assets
Tech corps are difficult to price, as growth is nonlinear and direct costs are more or less fixed (Twitter has similar infrastructure costs servicing 1m people vs 1bn). Same happens with crypto, thus investors create new metrics for estimating value.
5/ Gaming the System
As we learned during the Dotcom era, the issue is that when startups see investors using a certain valuation metric, they restructure their business to inflate their own metric.
Thus the number not only becomes unusable, but dangerous and misleading.
6/ The Dangers of TVL
TVL is an attempt to measure popularity and community commitment. But since the same dollars can be ‘folded’ into themselves, and count as more $, it gives a skewed picture of how much adoption there is. TVL might even end up being a sign of inefficiency.
7/ High TVL = Inefficiency
Imagine you have a protocol that has $1bn in daily trading volume, but a TVL of $100bn. That is not efficient, as it implies that 99% of the capital is underutilized. High TVL, without high trading volume, might just imply bloat, NOT desirability.
8/ TVL Was Mainly For DEXs
In traditional DEXs, where you lock your assets in a jointly-owned smart contract, you need large liquidity. Otherwise, minor withdrawals of any token cause massive slippage - difference between the expected and final execution price.
9/ Next-Generation DEXs
In the future, when liquidity will be modeled efficiently, and users don’t need to pool their assets, the goal will be the opposite - a low TVL that serves a volume far higher than itself. This will be the era of hyper-efficient DeFi.
10/ Why TVL Got Popular
DEXs were the first large-scale smart contract projects, so their operational standards framed our understanding of the rest of the DeFi industry. That said, these early assumptions have become increasingly outdated and incentivize unhealthy protocols.
11/ Going to the LUNA
A perfect example is LUNA where a high initial TVL increased its coin value, allowing its treasury to purchase more BTC, increasing its TVL and then token value. Every TVL increase weakened the protocol, as people wondered how this was at all sustainable
12/ ADA & TVL
ADA is often mocked for its low TVL, supposedly making it a poor investment. Yet this utilitarian assessment completely ignores user experience.
Are you going to place your money somewhere where it's LOCKED for months, or instantly available?
13/ Suitcase Logic
If you put $1m into a $5 suitcase, the bag is only worth $1m + $5 until you take the million dollars
If you want the suitcase to increase in value, then you must increase people's demand for the bag, not just hope some millionaire places their net worth there
14/ Kidnapped Value
We should not have a valuation metric based on Stockholm Syndrome, where a protocol is only valuable in direct proportion to how much value it can kidnap from its users.
Not only is this capital inefficient, but misaligns the desires of users and developers.
15/ Blockchains Survive Via Community
As most crypto projects are open source, projects live and die by community adoption and network effects gained from their widespread use. Any honest metric should take into account value created for their users, not just locked value.
16/ What Even is Locked?
Due to the fact that TVL isn’t based on sound principles, and grew organically, everyone has a different definition. Sites will arbitrarily decide not to include certain “locked value” but others do. We should standardize what “locking value” even means.
17/ Proposed Solution
TVL is an outdated and AMM-specific metric. We need metrics that measure intrinsic value. Only by measuring the intrinsic value we can estimate what the suitcase is really worth.
18/ Useful Metrics
For instance, trading platforms should have low slippage, deep liquidity (especially around the spread aka the current price), and high transaction volume (being popular).
19/ Shadows and Dust
The chief factor that we ought to consider is the utility that a protocol provides and how effectively it does so - all else is secondary and manipulable. It’s not to say that we should never consider financial metrics, but the map is not the territory.
20/ Conclusion
TVL is a metric we invented to measure value in an evolving industry. However, as we saw in the case of the Solana brothers, TVL has failed to account for the complexity of crypto - it's nonsense!
It's time to put TVL in a drawer and lock it there for good.
If you enjoyed this thread, please like, retweet, and subscribe to @CardanoMaladex 🧵
Make sure to check out our ongoing #TradFiTales series too:
Memecoin fever has gripped Cardano, and it has a lot of people confused. How is it possible that in the midst of the iciest of bear markets, there is still enough dry powder to create a speculative mania?
Today we will be discussing the economics of memecoins.
2/ On the Origin of Memecoins
Memes are units of culture, they’re small packets of information that contain a basic idea that is interesting enough to get passed on and evolve through each generation it exists in.
Memecoins, on the other hand, are tokenized viral ideas.
- Active: Where you make regular decisions to address your investing needs
- Passive: Where you fund a specific strategy & keep doing so indefinitely
Both have their benefits and weaknesses, which we will explore in this thread.
2/ Active Investing
When the average person thinks about investing, they think of active investing - of an investor finding some secret pattern in the data and striking it rich because of it. Unfortunately, the reality is more complicated than that.
DeFi will defy expectations - why on-chain identities are essential for mass adoption of #Cardano.
- Thread Time 🧵-
1/ Intro
Now that the angry dust is clearing from the contingent staking debate, perhaps it's worth discussing why on-chain identity verification can be very important to mass adoption.
It's not without its tradeoffs, but it is needed if we want to fully bloom to our potential
2/ Adoption
If you want to attract the enormous liquidity of financial institutions, you need to allow for TradFi to work in DeFi by allowing legacy operational procedures to work on-chain.
In other words, users need to have freedom to decide how and when transactions execute.
Bears are vicious creatures, you blink for a second, and they can rip away any gains you had with a single swipe.
In this thread, we'll discuss the three genres of assets and how to build a portfolio that can not only survive the bear market but thrive.
2/ Asset Genres
Whether you're talking about stocks, real estate, commodities, etc., they all broadly fall into three broad archetypes that denote their behavior within a complex system:
Cardano is entering the age of Voltaire, the age of community governance.
This is going to be a critical development period, which will, in no small part, determine the future of the blockchain.
In this thread, we'll discuss the pitfalls and solutions to governance.
2/ 1st Principles
The problem that governance seeks to solve is what is termed in finance as the "principal-agent problem" (PAP), as in when stakeholders nominate someone to represent them, but they're unsure if the agent will act in the stakeholder's best interests or their own