Julia Attwood Profile picture
Aug 18 10 tweets 7 min read
(1/9) I’ve seen a lot of op-eds about how awful it is that #CCS was included in the #IRA. Most lack nuance, because they haven’t clocked that the #energytransition isn’t just about the power sector anymore. Sorry #energytwitter. So, a 🧵 on why carbon capture still has a place.
(2/9) First, I get this. I was a huge #CCS skeptic. Two things changed my mind: modelling pathways to #netzero for materials with my @BloombergNEF team, and the #BNEFNEO team's carbon budgets for industry. Sobering work that taught me a lot.
(3/9) Some industries just can’t do without CCS. Process emissions are just as harmful as combustion. And we’re past the point where abatement of emissions is enough. That means removals, which means #DirectAirCapture.
(4/9) I agree that CCS+coal shouldn’t be a thing. Renewables will make coal redundant eventually, and I hope soon. But that application for CCS *still* won’t be economically viable, even with new #45Q. However, it does bring #steel, #petrochemicals and #cement into the picture.
(5/9) For #petrochemicals and #cement there are few large-scale decarbonization options. 60% of cement’s emissions are a chemical by-product from turning calcium carbonate and limestone into cement. All the #hydrogen and #renewables in the world won’t abate those emissions.
(6/9) I can’t see a way to decarbonize cement (8% of global emissions) without CCS. If you do, DM me, because we’re writing about this soon. That only leaves the option to stop using cement, or offset its emissions entirely through #DirectAirCapture. I think both are unlikely.
(7/9) #petrochemicals have both feedstock and production emissions. Fuel switching only fixes production. The high cost of #hydrogen made plastic, a lack of sustainable biomass, and demand outstripping plastic scrap supply, means 41% of capacity uses CCS in our net-zero scenario.
(8/9) Could the #IRA have made #45Q better, rather than just bigger? Sure. #Canada’s CCUS subsidy doesn’t allow #EOR projects to claim credits. (Go Canada 🇨🇦) It could have left out the power sector, and the Infrastructure Bill could give CCS grants only to hard-to-abate sectors.
(9/9) But if it can accelerate #decarbonization for two of the hardest hard-to-abate sectors – probably worth it.
P.S. Sorry about the #IRA thing Irish friends.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julia Attwood

Julia Attwood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(