This is the former Ricardo Ranch. It's 570 hectares and was previously part of an Area Structure Plan engage.calgary.ca/RicardoRanch
As the maps show, environmentally sensitive areas are acknowledged, but barley mentioned in the plan, with few concrete promises of protection. 2/
Regardless, there will be 16,000-20,000 people planned to live in this sensitive, intact area. To see what the future holds, you just have to look across Deerfoot 3/
But what lives there now? A rich variety of native plants and species.
I took a long walk through the area Saturday morning, trying to document what I could to create a record of what will be lost.
Here's a small example of the richness this area holds 4/
First, there are the extremely productive wetland areas that, while they appear to be exempt from direct development, will be subject to increase pressures from regional pathways and parks.
As they are now, they are full of birds, plants and microorganisms 5/
Great Blue Heron, Greater Yellowlegs, Solitary Sandpipers and several Wilson's Snipes were all using the wetlands, but they weren't alone 6/
Robins, Cedar Waxwings, Savannah Sparrows and Northern Flickers were all enjoying the chance to bathe and drink from these spots 7/
Particularly concerning were the signs of Bank Swallow colonies throughout this area. These birds are a SARA-listed species with a Recovery Plan. Further evidence of these colonies could make this area Critical Habitat under the Act 8/
My walk made it clear that the diversity in this area was spectacular.
The riparian vegetation was very healthy, and even this late in the year, many wildflowers were still in bloom and the pollinators were busy (Bumblebee and Common Wood Nymph in 3 and 4) 9/
In the open areas, birds of prey were stalking their next kill while other songbirds were eating bugs out of midair or causing a ruckus in the deep undergrowth.
Merlin, Eastern Kingbird, House Wren (making his displeasure at my presence known), and a Red Tailed Hawk 10/
How can you look at this and not feel a sense of sadness about its destruction?
It's mind boggling that this area is not already protected.
Its value of it is right there in front of us, clear to see if you just look 11/
All this is to say, we're losing something we can never get back.
Why?
Because we refuse to take climate change seriously and continue to build like we've always built.
We're convinced there are no consequences.
What's worse is that the solutions are right in front of us 12/
So if you're like me and you get a pit in your stomach when you think about this, make your opposition known.
Pester anyone and everyone you can.
It might not be too late to preserve some of this area and protect it for generations to come.
It's worth fighting for 13/
I should add that unfortunately this isn't the end. 4 more areas are planned to be developed soon with more to come.
We need to stop this and start building within our existing footprint.
I've got more threads coming on the other areas, so stay tuned if you're interested 14/
Courts are busy. Remands are busy. Probation is busy. Lawyers are busy. Police are busy.
And they are busiest with high volumes of minor crime that turn into long-term cycles of criminality due to circumstances and laws that trap them in a way that's hard to break out of 2/
So instead of addressing the roots, we continue to use the justice system as triage to create quick solutions with limited effectiveness over time.
But why isn't it effective? Let's follow a hypothetical from beginning to end 3/
1. "This charge is wholly unexpected and inexplicable." Well, no. Any kind of tampering with a judge HEARING YOUR OWN CASE is hugely aggravating and will almost always attract criminal consequences, especially when you admit you did it.
1a. Cooperating with the Law Society is well and good but they are not the police, who have charging discretion. Turns out they decided this was serious enough to lay charges.
Messing with a judge is the epitome of "fuck around, find out" and Mr. Carpay found out.
The history of conservation and environmentalism in Alberta is something that isn't spoken about enough but there's been some amazing people that have done amazing things in our province.
One of the most significant actions involved the Oldman River Dam - long🧵 1/ #abpoli
You might remember that the Oldman River was central to recent opposition to the Grassy Mountain Mine, but this wasn't its first time in the spotlight.
What started as opposition to damming the river in the 1970s led to a historical shift in Canadian environmental law 2/
The Alberta government had big ideas for Alberta rivers, including mega projects to divert water for irrigation and sale to the US.
Beginning in the 70s, Alberta Environment began looking into suitable sites for multiple dams that would have huge effects on watersheds 3/
1/ Read the Trails Act yesterday and many people smarter than me have already commented, but here's a thread about what it means for the environment and if it's actually good.
2/ The Act essentially gives the Minister unfettered power to create trails on any and all public land across Alberta. There are no checks on the Minister's power - regulations don't even apply.
Jason Nixon's friends want a new trail somewhere? Like magic, he can make it.
3/ We heard a lot about more enforcement, protection, and oversight.
But the Act requires none of this. All sections about trail management are permissive. The Minister MAY do something but they don't have to do anything.
These trails are being thrown to the proverbial wolves.
With a new city council now sitting in #yyc, it would be great to see some renewed conversations about the status of biodiversity and natural areas in the city, which is suffering as we continue to grow.
Going to add to this thread with ideas and concerns #yyccc 1/
To start: the 80,000 LED streetlights that were installed as of 2017. Great for energy efficiency, bad for bugs and other creatures (as our normal streetlights, but these are worse).
Dead bugs and moths = bad for biodiversity 2/ #yyccc
Groups like the @weaselheadpark are undertaking projects to create nocturnal preserves within our city, which would benefit so many species. It would be awesome to see something like this supported by city council and implemented in our city 3/ #yyccc
1/An excellent piece from @NancySMacdonald raising important questions about human-wildlife conflicts and the evolution (or lack thereof) of our policy and ethics.
As humans continue to encroach on wilderness, how do we co-exist? #cdnpoli
2/The story itself is compelling, especially the approach of the conservation officer and the response of his superiors. What's clear is that things have not changed, and this is a problem across North America.
There's a few interesting subjects raised by this article as well.
3/First, we've already permanently affected the distribution of large mammals in North America and beyond, especially carnivores. The historical distribution of grizzly bears is one small example.
They used to be found all the way to Saskatchewan!