There were several obvious contradictions in the presentation. Expect a longer thread to follow. This below "real time goals" is likely the most egregious.
Source: @CDCofBC slide
Another @CDCofBC slide, from Sept/Oct. 2021 to March 2022 , children were group most acutely infected with #COVID. % are in fact underestimation of real jump in VCH-FHA general community seroprevalence. Children attack rate > than parents age = School Transmission.
Presenter confirmed that data was presented to BC Public Health leaders. Seemed to be an emphasis on separation of roles: research vs policy making. Does not align with @CDCofBC website. Brits call this a "say-do gap." bccdc.ca/about/what-we-…
Also does not align with the stated real-time goals of the study.
A quote in the chat sums up the real ethical problem: "The study itself doesn't raise ethics concerns to me. What raises ethics concerns is the involvement of Dr. Bonnie Henry, particularly her being an author while simultaneously impacting the factors the study is examining..."
"- both the under-ascertainment / testing availability, and the measures / lack thereof that contributed to infection spread."
Expect authors to say they were not directly examining these factors. In fact, they were examining their outcomes: how many children were infected because inadequate protective measures were in place in schools. Meanwhile at pressers, parents/teachers heard schools were safe.
Data was there and yet no intervention happened to prevent further infections in children. Looks very much like Sweden, where leaders bought into "immunity through infection", especially infection of children. Heard word "silver lining" used in the BC CDC presentation.
PHO has denied infections occurred in schools.There has been no acknowledgement of the true study results by #bcpoli#bced Worse, still no interventions to make BC schools #Covid safe. Meanwhile, #Omicron infections and reinfections are happening.
TL;DR. Received this preprint and non peer reviewed study to our inbox. Notice the authors.
A few observations, comments and questions. 1/18
Study is extension of the presentation at BC government presser of April 5, 2022. Showing % pop'n (children & adults) with antibodies (from infection and/or vax) presenting to outpatient lab in two BC Health Authorities from March'20 to March'22, overlapping BC's epi curve. 2/18
Current paper: data up to August 2022.
"Seroprevalence (from infn and/or vax) was < or =1% by the 3rd snapshot in Sept. 2020 and <5% by January 2021 (4th). Following vax roll-out, ⬆️ to >55% by May/June 2021 (5th), ~80% by Sept/Oct 2021 (6th), and >95% by March 2022 (7th)." 3/18
While the exponential growth of Monkeypox is seen in Canada and around the world Dr. Marin Lavoie, deputy provincial health officer sent an advisory downgrading the duty to report to confirmed or probable cases only. Suspected cases are no longer to be reported.
Living in a place where monkeypox has been reported is one requirement for a probable case. Since there are cases in BC, that means anyone with an unexplained new rash or lesions is considered a probable case and should be reported!
This apparent downgrade is an upgrade!
How is monkeypox spread? It has traditionally been spread mainly by close contact but the unusually rapid increase in cases doubling weekly suggests airborne spread as well.
But the @CDCofBC says it is spread by droplets with close contact for prolonged time. (like transit?)
1/Excellent reporting by @TheTyee:
“Although many PH officials still dismiss COVID infections as inevitable & even beneficial, a growing body of science shows this fashionable dogma is dangerously wrongheaded, if not an outright form of malpractice.”
2/ “Reinfections, and 2022 is surely the year of reinfections, just increase the damage from COVID, which can be profound: immune dysregulation, blood clots, nerve cell death, inflammation, lung damage, kidney failure and brain damage.”
3/ “New science shows that Omicron & its variants are getting better at evading immune defences induced by vaccines or by natural infection. BA5, for example, is more transmissible than any previous variant.”
Back in Dec.2020, mayors were saying "better city-level data would help municipalities better respond to the pandemic." Public Health refused based on false argument of "privacy." saanichnews.com/news/more-city…
Local data matters. Covid risks differ locally.
"The cities & towns with highest death rates generally fit one (or more) of 3 categories:
1-smaller communities (like Oliver & Prince Rupert) with a care home that sustained a severe & deadly outbreak;" 2/4
Dr. @DrFiliatrault of @Protect_BC is introducing "Covid in the House: Protect Your Loved Ones" and is making a land acknowledgment. First guest today is a professional mechanical engineer @joeyfox85, with a decade of HVAC experience & is a school board engineer. #bcpoli