Teddy Hla Profile picture
Oct 25 16 tweets 7 min read
NEXT Inventory and Comparison of ICU datasets by Christopher SAUER

"Why talk on differences in ICU databases?"
Ans: becuase data is "CORE"
@ESICM #ml #ai #databases #datascience #LIVES2022
@ESICM Merit of publicly available ICU databases
- no randomzined evidence exists for most clinical situations
-data and pt level insights incredibly useful.
-local epidemiology and treatment difers
-real world data sets help deliver optimal treatment policies.
#DataScience #LIVES2022
@ESICM 1st publicly available dataset MIMIC-3 in 2016,
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston,MA
>70,000 icu stays, 2008 to 2019
now also includes chest x-rays, emergency room data
- large, community developed Github repo.
#DataScience
@ESICM Systemetic review
1. what publicly availa data sets exist
2. what patient characteristics, admission population, treatment intensity, outcomes compare ?
3. which databases suited for which type of research
4. what consequences for transferability?

(excellent pertinent questions)
@ESICM 4 publicly available datasets identified
1.Amsterdam UMCdb - 20k icu patients
2. eICU-CRD (collab with Philips)
3. HiRID
4. MIMIC
Differences in admission
Have different frequencies. Have an issue if it’s time series modelling
Most eye opening for Sauer himself is different treatment intensity and outcomes.
- significantly upto x3 higher ICU mortality
vasopressor use 69% in Amsterdam vs eICU 12% and MIMIC 31%
-invasive ventilator use 83% in amsterdam vs 33 in MIMIC
-emergency admn icu mortality 18.3% vs. 8.9% in MIMIC IV
This is fascinating.

Perhaps admission thresholds different in public v private systems OR USA v. EU for example.
Individual strengths and weaknesses
Thus, findings may not be generalisable. Model re-training required.

findings should be validated in at least 2 data sets. models may require adjustments according to variable availability and distributions
Key take-away's
- "best" icu data set depends on research question
- be prepared to adjust your models
- hope that in next few years, there will be database from outside of Western Europe.@ESICM (interesting final point of equity of ML too) #datascience #criticalcare #ai
Author happy to be reached out. linkedin.com/in/cmsauer/
Q : what EHR vendor you have impacts on the database?
A : interesting question. doesnt know about vendor but potentially could have consequences. equally, people's attitude to privacy and how each health system stringently structures and saves their data makes a difference.
in summary, less of a vendor and more of how a health system uses that to collect,save and store the data likely to make a bigger difference.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teddy Hla

Teddy Hla Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teddyhla

Oct 25
Carolyn Calfee Clinical and Biological phenotypes of ARDS
- what do they have in common?

ARDS : subgrouping since the begining
- sepsis vs. non sepsis
- hyper vs. hypoinflamm
- reactive vs uninflamed
#ventilation #ards #phenotypes #LIVES2022
Are clinical phenotypes biologically distinct?
looking at Trauma vs. Non trauma

ICAM-1 , SP-D, vWF, sTNFr-1 are different.
What about in "Direct" vs. "indirect"
or "Diffuse" vs "focal" -- sRAGE comes up again.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17944012/
#ventilation #ARDS #LIVES2022
Image
Read 13 tweets
Oct 25
Mariangela PELLEGRINI
Uppsala- Sweden
"Do we Need a biological definition of ARDS"

- Berlin definition has NO Diffuse alveolar damage .
- the Berlin defn does not capture well
Frohlich - different definitions specificity of 0.63, 0.42, 0.31 even!
#ventilation #ards #LIVES2022
academic.oup.com/bja/article/11…
The BJA article by Frohlich.
Fibrosis only starts after 7 days
Thille article : atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.11…
In essence, different disease processes are happening to the lung at different times in the "ARDS"
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24429204/
Read 14 tweets
Oct 25
ARDS - new definition or phenotypes by @GicoBellani refreshing with Kigali definition of ARDS - useful not just low resource but during pandemic in supposedly high income settings and only draw back is no PEEp requirement #ards #ventilation #LIVES2022 @ESICM
@GicoBellani @ESICM Resolved versus confirmed ARDS
- prospectively applying Berlin definition did work but if ya wait 24 hrs and re-measure P/F ratio, you end up stratifying much better.
- Better separation of groups

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29632996/
#ventilation #LIVES2022
@GicoBellani @ESICM Whichever definition - american european consensus or Berlin or Kigali -- all goes back to Ashbaugh original paper in 1967

thelancet.com/journals/lance…

Why are we so confused when it comes to ARDS definition ?

#ards #ventilation #LIVES2022 @ESICM
Read 11 tweets
Oct 25
Next : Mypinder SEKHON on cardiac arrest in COVID-19 era.

Works in Vancouver
COVID 19 era cardiac arrest ARE a lot less sexy with all the PPE. #als #covid19 #resuscitation #LIVES2022
@ESICM
@ESICM Let's look at epidemiology. Northern Italy, Manhattan - COVID hit hard and has impact on other diseases.

e.g., OHCA in Italy during COVID 19 massive spike.
ImageImageImage
Read 9 tweets
Oct 25
NEXT Speaker : VA ecmo for which patients?
Alain COMBES

Severe cardiogenic shock has different phenotypes
1. medical cardiogenic shock(AMI, end stage dilated CM, myocarditis, septic shock)
2. Post cardiotomy refractory CS (post CABG)
#LIVES2022
@ESICM #ecmo #resuscitation #ALS
@ESICM 2022 what do the guidelines say
- ESC recommends short term MCS should be considred in cardiogenic shock.
IABP may be considered but not routinely recommended in post MI
#LIVES2022
Image
Read 18 tweets
Oct 25
what about in refractory cardiac arrest?
ERC - ESICM guidelines 2021
- timing of CAG if no evidence ofr ST segment evaluation.

which means we will end up treating a lot of patients with stent and anticoagulation
TOMAHAWK trial : delayed or early invasive angiography -- no effec.

#LIVES2022
- immediate catheterisation for non ST elevationrr
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(