Who wants a nice thread on environmental pressures from the global food system? You know you do @GlobalFoodLeeds @SRILeeds 1/ Image
An awesome team led by @BSHalpern & @ucsb_nceas calculated and, for the first time, produced a spatial map of where pressures from the food system are produced. Paper at: nature.com/articles/s4189…, email me if you want a PDF 2/ Image
We found that these pressures (disturbance, nutrient pollution, water use, and GHG emissions) are wildly uneven in their distribution. Over 90% of pressures come from just 10% of the world; with 40% of pressures from the just 1% 3/ Image
Perhaps unsurprisingly (given this uneven spread), the distribution of individual pressures are quite similar: e.g. high water use is associated with high nutrient pollution. 4/ Image
...although there are some differences: places where only one or two pressures overlap 5/ Image
Perhaps less surprising is the finding that a few countries dominate cumulative pressures: India, China, US, Brazil and Pakistan have nearly 50% of pressures (with a big chunk of the world's food production and population) 6/ Image
And, as you may have guessed, livestock represent an enormous proportion of the world's environmental pressure from food systems (for not a huge amount of food produced) 7/ Image
Livestock also provide a really interesting insight into the linkages between marine and terrestrial #foodsystems. A lot of marine food is used to supply livestock, and a chunk of crops feed #aquaculture farms. What you do on land matters in the sea, and vice-versa 8/ Image
So what does this mean for #sustainability? Well, firstly, we looked at PRESSURES not IMPACTS. The latter will require an in-depth understanding of the sensitivity of different environments: a litre of water in Leeds does not equal a litre in California 9/
See this ace diagram from @cdkuempel doi.org/10.1016/j.onee… 10/ Image
So we provide the basis for other people to understand the pressures on their particular system, and investigate what this means for the #biodiversity, the #environment, and for people there. 10/
There are some big findings here, but I think the real value is what this research allows us to do now. Understanding #foodsystems #sustainability requires putting all food, & all pressures, on the same table doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1…. Only then can you understand what to do 11/11 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Williams @ZoologyDave@sciencemastodon.com

David Williams @ZoologyDave@sciencemastodon.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoologyDave

Jun 7, 2022
There's a lot of #badnews about #biodiversity and #conservation at the moment, so how about some #conservationoptimism? 🧵 based on our new paper pnas.org/doi/full/10.10… and some awesome recent work by others... 1/
As you probably know, the world has ambitious targets to protect 17% of the world's land for #biodiversity #conservation, and there are calls to increase this to anywhere between 26-60% in the next round of @UNBiodiversity talks (this year) 2/
In theory, this is great for biodiversity (more on the human impacts later). Problem is that the total area of land that you protect may not be important: a lot of #protectedareas are small or isolated, and this means that the populations are also small and isolated 3/
Read 21 tweets
Dec 21, 2020
Amidst the horror of the late-2020 UK, I've got some #GoodNews to share! Alongside some #BadNews for #biodiversity and #conservation. So buckle up for some hot-off-the-press science from @UniversityLeeds @RSPBScience @oxmartinschool @naturesustainab
nature.com/articles/s4189…
1/
TLDR: we projected that ~88% of the 20,000 #species we looked at will lose habitat to farmland by 2050, and ~1300 will lose 25% (a QUARTER!) of their remaining habitat. This is #badnews and could hugely increase #extinction risks. 2/ nature.com/articles/s4189…
BUT with proactive #conservation actions we can eliminate losses! Increasing agricultural yields, shifting to healthier diets, reducing food waste, and global-scale land-use planning can, when combined, provide healthy diets for a growing population AND conserve biodiversity 2/
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(