Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and M.K. Gandhi's debate on Hinduism and Caste.
(PART-1) ๐งต
M.K. Gandhi (1/3)
The Vedas, Upanishads, smritis and puranas, including the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, are the Hindu scriptures. There is no finite list. Every generation has added to the list.
M.K. Gandhi (2/3)
Therefore, that everything printed or even found handwritten is not scripture. The #smritis, for example, contain many things that can never be accepted as a word from God. Thus, many texts which Dr #Ambedkar cites from smritis cannot be considered authentic.
M.K. Gandhi (3/3)
Even when you have an expurgated edition of the scriptures, you will need their interpretation. Who is the best interpreter? Not learned men surely. Religion lives in the experiences of its saints and seers.
I confess I am no authority on this matter. But I should like to state that the texts cited by me are all taken from the writings of the late Mr Tilak, who was a recognised authority on the #Sanskrit language & on the #Hindu shastras.
His second point is that these shastras should be interpreted not by the learned but by the saints; and that as the saints have understood them the shastras do not support #Caste and #untouchability.
What does it avail to anyone if the texts are interpolations, and if they have been differently interpreted by the saints? The masses do not make any distinction between texts which are genuine and texts which are interpolations.
The masses have no idea what the texts are. They are too illiterate to know what shastras are about. They believed what they were told, and what they were told is that the Shastra impose as their religious duty respect for the caste and the untouchability.
Dr. Ambedkar (5/6)
With regard to the saints, one must admit that howsoever different and
elevating their teachings may have been as compared to those of the merely learned, they have been lamentably ineffective.
They have been ineffective for two reasons. Firstly, none of the saints ever attacked the caste system. On the contraryโthey were staunch believers in the system of castes.
The saints have never,
according to my study, carried on a campaign against caste and
untouchability. They were not concerned with the struggle between men.
They were concerned with the relation between man and god. They did not
preach that all men were equal.
They preached that all men were equal in the
eyes of godโa very different and a very innocuous proposition, which
nobody can find difficult to preach or dangerous to believe in.
The second reason why the teachings of the saints proved ineffective was because the masses have been taught that a saint might break caste, but the common man must not. A saint therefore never became an example to follow. He always remained a pious man to be honoured.
That the masses have remained staunch believers in caste and untouchability shows that the pious lives and noble sermons of the saints have had no effect on their life and
conduct, as against the teachings of the shastras.
Thus it can be a matter of no consolation that there were saints, or that there is a Mahatma who
understands the shastras differently from the learned few or ignorant many.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People love to preach about how loving Lord Ram was toward Sita. Thatโs probably because theyโve never read verses 15-25 from Sarga 115 of the Yuddha Kanda in the Valmiki Ramayana. Go ahead and read them to see just how 'loving' he really was ๐งต
Let it be known to you that this endeavor in the shape of war, which has been successful carried through, due to the strength of my friends was not undertaken for your sake. Let there be prosperity to you! This was done by me in order to keep up my good conduct and to wipe off the evil-speaking from all sides as well as the insinuation on my own illustrious dynasty.
Explained - The verses suggest that Ramโs focus was on his image and duty as a king. His priority was to maintain the dignity of his lineage. So the rescue of Sita and Battle with Ravana was to save only the reputation & social standing.
Thread ๐งต: Indiaโs Waste CrisisโA Dirty Truth No One Wants to Talk About
1/10
Letโs face itโIndia is drowning in trash. Everywhere you look, thereโs plastic, wrappers, cans, and piles of junk. People have become desensitized to this filth as if itโs normal. But hereโs the truth: itโs not just a cleanliness problem; itโs a social problem.
2/10
Look at what happens after Diwali. The streets are blanketed in firework remains & debris. Itโs like the celebration justifies leaving our mess everywhere. Does anyone stop to think whoโll clean it up? Of course notโbecause that responsibility falls on someone else.
Hereโs Whatโs Seriously Wrong with Laapataa Ladies: ๐งต
1. The dialogues are preachy and fail to resemble natural conversations among villagers. The writing feels lazy, as the Brahmin writers try too hard to put progressive dialogues into the movie that donโt fit the characters or setting. The movie compensates for it by relying heavily on drama and manipulative music.
2. Jaya is the first to tell Deepakโs mother that her food is delicious and encourages her to cook her favorite meal for herself. It suggests that Deepak never had this conversation with his mother. Yet, this same Deepak is portrayed as the ideal partner for Phool.
Today marks the 97th anniversary of the historic Mahad Satyagraha.
Here's a thread discussing this revolutionary non-violent protest, which was a significant milestone in the fight for social justice, dignity and equality for Dalits. ๐งต
On August 4, 1923, SK Bole, a social reformer, proposed a resolution in the Bombay Legislative Council. The resolution stated:
The Bombay government reluctantly instructed all department heads on September 11, 1923 to implement it by 19th September 1923.
An in-depth analysis of the film "Fandry" directed by @Nagrajmanjule. ๐งต
Family of Jabya ( Dalit) lives on the outskirts of a village. To make ends meet, the family chases away pigs and also kills them to prevent them from creating nuisance in the villageโa task assigned to the Dalit family since upper-caste families consider it unhygienic & impure.
The young Jabya, however, remains disillusioned by the situation and develops feelings for an upper-caste girl, Shalu, who attends the same school.
We, as Dalits, are exhausted from repeatedly debunking this misinformation. It seems like the truth is often overlooked.
The 10-year limit was specifically for political reservation, a point Dr. Ambedkar never advocated. In fact, he opposed a fixed 10-year timeframe, even for political reservations for SCs.