Unredacted 'Fauci emails' proving no scientists had any idea about the virus and no inclination of any cover-up, quite the opposite actually, they investigated thoroughly the idea of a #lableak.
Lableakers: WHERE ARE THE HIDDEN EMAILS WHERE THEY DO THE COVERUP STUFF? 🙄🙄
I hope this will be a lesson to many in the media who extended a lot of false goodwill to the fantasies of rank #conspiracists over the statements of professional virologists just doing their work.
The fact that they double down after being proven wrong is just 🚩🚩🚩
As I said previously, and repeatedly, there is no place in polite society for people who profit from #lies, who push harmful conspiracy myths that expose scientists to harassment, threats, and #stochastic terrorism
Any journalist who still decides to #amplify them is accountable
These people are not credible voices, they are not 'scientific dissenters' who just disagree with the science, and they do not care about evidence nor have any relevant domain knowledge.
They are conspiracy #influencers for personal gain.
And they show it again and again.
So what to do next?
Well, ideally, these people vanish in #shame, but if we have learned anything about the #information age, then it's that #liars will be doubling down by creating ever more #dramatic lies in hopes of more attention & reach (think Trump)
So best is to ignore.
The professional class, from #journalists, editors to scientists to legislators should recalibrate (if they have not yet) their opinion of these grifters and ignore them too
If I see another op-ed where DRASTIC members, Ebright or Chan are quoted uncritically, you can be sure...
...that it will not go down well with scientists and the public who has paid attention.
Platforming proven liars is not only #poison for the info sphere, but it also corrodes #democratic societies.
We all can get fooled, but at some point, we have to learn our lessons.
/end
Here is another take from virologist @stuartjdneil who has been very open to 'heterodox' ideas on the origins question and the claims made by advocates.
I've written a bit about this Musk Twitter thing from a system's perspective, and this here 🔽 is a clear signal for what I deem one of the likely outcomes.
System disintegration into smaller subsystems.
Twitter will become smaller, weaker & probably align itself with 1/
If you are in the EU (+adjacent), expect Twitter to be gone sooner rather than later and live with an alternative that will be more European and less global.
If you are in the US (+adjacent), expect Twitter to stay but transform.
2/
For the US, @davetroy has laid out some suggestions (which I do not fully endorse but can see going in that direction) how a Musk Twitter might look like & be used to further the interests of a very specific network and thought ecosystem.
First, kudos to the Chinese authors doing this work & a shoutout to @edwardcholmes also involved
I already flagged this Wang et al. preprint yesterday but it is worth explaining its significance to both the #origins discussion and the related pandemic #prevention discussion
One can imagine CoV genomes like colorful Lego brick walls, and recombination as taking one brick from a different virus and putting it in the wall of another; changing the color while keeping roughly the function. 3/
Maybe another word on the '#unredacted Fauci emails', now that it is clear that there were no cover-ups or suppression of #lableak, but just neutral #scientific discussion.
Observe how lableak advocates will run their #disinformation playbook, we've seen this before.
A 🧵
1/
Everytime new contradictory information (to the lableak conspiracy myth) comes out, there is an increase in #activity by lableak advocates.
We've seen this with the BANAL sequences in LAOS that proved that the RBD domain of SARS-CoV-2 was not 'manmade' 2/
Discussions about #FreeSpeech are misguided in the information age.
Even before our voices are drowned out by the noise on social media, or overwritten by information combatants, we lose our agency and decision autonomy to manipulative complex systems we don’t fully understand.
The whole point of the #enlightenment, the scientific revolution, our educational and #epistemic institutions was to empower individuals to find a way out of their self-imposed #immaturity, to take #agency over their lives and make informed decisions.
We need #epistemic clarity about reality, for without it, our agency will be blunted & our freedom a charade
It is public-interest education, journalism & science that truly make individuals in a #democratic society free, not the right to cast a vote or to elect a representative
I think many people do not conceptualize properly how Musks actions will manifest and alter Twitter, occupying opposing sites between 'nothing gonna change at the core' to 'everything will break down eventually'.
Both views are insufficient to understand what is happening.
1/
Musk's actions can be seen as perturbations to a self-organized system that evolved around a set of rules & environmental restrictions. This complex system has adapted itself against competing social media systems and showed a certain robustness & stability to a changing world
2/
Musk's strong perturbations threw the system out of equilibrium, and as long as they persist, will keep pushing the system further and further away from it, until one of two things happen.
A) new equilibrium is found
B) disintegration of the whole into smaller subsystems
3/
The saddest part about the repeated harassment of scientists by conspiracy theorists, influencers and information combatants is that it is not a new phenomenon, but a well established tactic.
What's new is that the information age made it a crowd-sourced project. But why? 1/
The uncertainty of the pandemic brought a variety of scientists to the forefront of society; virologists, epidemiologists, vaccine researchers, and doctors were in demand and many did the best they could to explain, advise and help society navigate the pandemic.
2/
This newfound power and authority of science over parts of societal decision-making did not go down well with more traditional power-holders, from influencers to businesses to politicians.
To re-assert influence, they discredit science e.g through the use of conspiracy myths
3/