"Pakistan's High Commissioner to Britain Wajid Shamsul Hassan had said in a recent interview with an Indian TV channel that investigations had revealed that the [26/11] attacks were not planned inside Pakistan."
"Diplomatic and other sources told PTI that the Pakistani security establishment and the senior American diplomats had been referring to a possible Bangladeshi connection to the Mumbai attacks in the past few days."
What role did US diplomats play in the aftermath of the 26/11?
Here is the original article from @dawn_com which Pakistani and US investigators tried to pin Bangladeshi militants for the Mumbai attacks.
Dawn reveals @FBI and Pakistani agencies had been investigating the Bangladeshi angle. They had seen notes.
The Dawn article is misleading. But it's certainly worth revisiting.
Was the #ISI trying to make it look like American investigators were leading their probe on #MumbaiTerrorAttack or were US investigators helping deflect blame?
"Dhaka has strongly condemned a Pakistani investigation agency's claim of a Bangladesh-based terror outfit's involvement in the Mumbai terror attacks."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It opens with an acknowledgement that cricket related violence happened in 2017, but that the recent escalation was unique.
@guardian@nytimes come under fire lack of due diligence on Majid Freeman.
"As the events in Leicester took shape, NCRI analysis also found coordinated activity coming from self-identified Indian accounts amplifying
blame, ethnic distrust, and accusations against the Muslim community and Islam as a tradition."
Are you upset #HRes1430 mentions the religious and ethnic genocide of 1971?
I have talked about Hindus facing communal violence in Bangladesh. Why are you so hostile to the Awami League when they have said Hindus need to be protected?