Concerning the reshuffle in the military command: Since everyone is asking for comments, I will share a few preliminary thoughts. A thread 🧵
What is interesting at the moment is that everyone seems to be in shock: #Prigozhin's people, military correspondents, and the military. A great many knowledgeable people seem to not get the gist of this decision either, which suggests that it is a situational and sudden move.
This is not a promotion for #Gerasimov, even if he retained his post as head of the General Staff. Personnel decisions recently have been made to the contrary: not in order to achieve something, but rather to avoid something.
Gerasimov was handed command of the military operation because of Surovikin's serious setbacks.
Since we are not able to speak of any recent military successes (to put it mildly), Putin has had to deal in recent weeks, especially after Makiivka, with the showdown and mudslinging in long, sharp, emotional debates about the eternal Russian questions:
"who is to blame" and "what to do". Gerasimov (we have seen from his public appearance alongside #Putin that he has not lost credibility to the point of being ousted altogether) has obviously had an opportunity to have his say (and there is clearly a lot to be said).
The army's position is now truly clear: it is being torn apart publicly under the silent nod of the authorities and it's outrageous.
This is not a military coup, of course, but Gerasimov could have asked (though not demanded) carte blanche in the heat of verbal battles against the background of some very tense discussions. t.me/rusbrief/83296
For Putin this is manoeuvring, a tug-of-war between Surovikin (and his sympathizers like Prigozhin) and Gerasimov (who was suspended for months). Putin, as an unprofessional military man and one who does not understand how to salvage the whole affair, is wavering between them.
In a couple of months, Gerasimov may be out of the picture.
📌 No one is going to hand Gerasimov over "to the firing squad". t.me/rybar/42619
I don't see what Putin's interest is here. But it's very Putin-like to respond by appointing someone who was particularly outraged and can pretend to lecture about how things should have been done.
📌 For Surovikin, it is of course an unpleasant decision, but remediable. He has no choice but to give way to Gerasimov for now. It is not a fact that the new tactics will be more effective, and Surovikin may still be in demand later.
The conclusion is that Putin is looking for effective tactics in the conditions of a "creeping" loss. He is trying to reshuffle the pieces and is therefore giving chances to those who he finds persuasive. Today, Gerasimov turned out to be persuasive.
Tomorrow it could be anybody else. How many times has Putin publicly and derogatorily referred to the most influential and high-ranking figures (the FSB, Peskov, Naryshkin)? All are "idiots", but there are no others – this is Putin's attitude towards his subordinates.
That is the logic behind this decision. But in reality, the problem is not with the people, but with the tasks at hand.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
◽️The Christmas 'ceasefire'. We explain #Putin’s logic behind he decision to announce a 36-hour truce in #Ukraine, look closer into the reaction of the patriotic camp and how the president has to balance between two approaches - strategic one and situational.
Understanding this helps to predict Moscow’s further steps – both diplomatic and military. In this context we disclose the recent activities of Dmitry Kozak and whether it virtually implies the intention to talk about peace with the West.
Now this is extremely interesting: The governor of Kursk completed a basic training course with #Wagner PMC. Roman Starovoit spent the first week of January in the training camp, as he said on his Telegram channel.
This is one of the main mechanisms for #Prigozhin to fit in with the elite. Prigozhin, as we have said before, is a figure without any official status, no official financial or administrative resources.
In essence, he is a private businessman who relies heavily on how his relations with the authorities are structured. As a result, it is a very vulnerable position.
Three features of the situation at the beginning of 2023. A short thread 🧵 on the near future of #Russianpolitics
1. #Putin's dependence on the #Russian military has sharply increased. At the same time, the military itself is completely "subjugated" to the political leadership and does not have subjectivity, which means that we should not expect it to try to influence the president.
But all of Putin's "legacy,” all of his grandiose plans to restore historical justice, not to mention his own future and physical security, now directly depend on the people fighting at the front.
To better understand the Christmas truce, we need to distinguish between the two approaches that are guiding #Putin at the same time.
The first is strategic: according to him, #Ukraine must be forced to surrender, whether that's in six months or in two years, it’s only a matter of time...
Putin believes that there is nowhere for Ukrainians to go, their only option is to capitulate. To anticipate it, he continues to count on the bombing of infrastructure.
#Putin's Christmas #ceasefire, which was announced today, fits well with his logic, in which #Russia acts on the good side of history and fights for justice. This is of course how he understands it. 1/4
But, moreover, it is also partly a consequence of Ukraine destroying the technical college in Makiivka on New Year's Eve, which resulted in dozens or hundreds of Russian casualties, most of which were recently mobilised. 2/4
Putin really does not want a repetition of that on (Orthodox) #Christmas Day. And we must not forget the noble publicity game: ... 3/4
For R.Politik’s last tweet of the year, we would like to offer some final thoughts on the difficulties of 2022, the war in Ukraine, and the future development of Russian politics.
When summing up 2022, many people stick to stark adjectives, calling the year monstrously terrible or similar. The war has caused emotional shock, pain and a sharp sense of irreparable loss.
It is hard to argue with this perspective: it is a terrible and ongoing tragedy for millions of people.